Skip to content

Niacin, N-3 Fatty Acids and Insulin Resistance

Niacin, N-3 Fatty Acids and Insulin Resistance

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00286234
Enrollment
68
Registered
2006-02-03
Start date
2007-10-31
Completion date
2008-12-31
Last updated
2021-10-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Metabolic Syndrome, Hypertriglyceridemia

Keywords

triglycerides, HDL-cholesterol, insulin resistance, omega-3 fatty acids, niacin

Brief summary

This research study is being conducted to test the effects of two drugs on blood lipids (cholesterol and triglycerides) and blood sugar (glucose) levels in patients with diabetes or pre-diabetes (both of which have a condition called insulin-resistance). These products are Niaspan (extended release nicotinic acid) and Omacor (omega-3 acid ethyl esters). We hypothesize that the combination of Niaspan and Omacor will reduce serum triglyceride levels, increase HDL-cholesterol levels and do so without altering glucose levels.

Detailed description

The insulin resistance syndrome (IRS) afflicts approximately 25% of the US adult population. Its principal components include some or all of the following: central obesity, elevated triglyceride levels, decreased high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels, a preponderance of small, dense low density lipoprotein (LDL) particles, hyperglycemia, hypertension, and increased thrombotic tendency. Subjects with the IRS are at increased risk for type 2 diabetes and/or coronary heart disease (CHD). While lifestyle changes (diet and exercise) often improve many of the manifestations of the IRS, pharmacotherapy is often needed to normalize individual components. In recent studies from our laboratory, niacin and fish oil (n-3 fatty acids, FA) used in combination in insulin resistant individuals led to an expected improved the lipid phenotype (reduced triglycerides, increased HDL-C, and fewer, small, dense LDL particles). What was not expected, however, was that an important marker of adipose tissue insulin resistance - meal-induced suppression of free fatty acid (FFA) flux - would be improved as well. Further, knowing that these agents (given as monotherapy) have been reported to worsen glycemia in diabetic subjects, we were surprised to find no significant deterioration in glycemic control. Further preliminary studies in patients with poorly-controlled type 2 diabetes confirmed the ability of this combination of over-the-counter natural agents to significantly improve the lipid profile without adverse effects on glycemia. Our working hypothesis is that excessive FFA flux from adipose tissue raises serum triglyceride concentrations and leads to other manifestations of the IRS. FFA flux is chronically elevated in insulin resistant subjects due to the insensitivity (i.e., resistance) of their adipocytes to the anti-lipolytic effects of insulin. Released FFA (especially from visceral adipose depots) stimulate hepatic triglyceride synthesis, leading to elevated serum triglyceride levels which subsequently contribute to reduced HDL-C and increased small, dense LDL concentrations. In addition, a high FFA flux can interfere with whole body glucose disposal. If this hypothesis is true, then interventions that improve adipocyte insulin sensitivity may be expected to improve a spectrum of risk factors associated with the insulin resistant state. Since our preliminary studies support this hypothesis, we propose the following four specific aims which will be tested in a 4-arm, randomized, placebo-controlled, double blind trial: Specific Aim 1. To test the hypothesis that n-3 FA and niacin (given singly and in combination) will enhance insulin-mediated suppression of FFA rate of appearance (Ra; a surrogate for adipose tissue insulin sensitivity) in insulin resistant subjects. Specific Aim 2. To test the hypothesis that n-3 FA and niacin (given singly and in combination) will improve insulin sensitivity in insulin resistant subjects. Specific Aim 3. To test the hypothesis that n-3 FA and niacin (given singly and in combination) will reduce VLDL-triglyceride production rates in insulin resistant subjects. Specific Aim 4. To test the hypothesis that n-3 FA and niacin (given singly and in combination) will improve the dyslipidemic profile (i.e., reduce serum triglyceride and small, dense LDL concentrations and elevate HDL-C concentrations) in insulin resistant subjects. At the completion of these studies, we expect to have detailed information on the potential therapeutic efficacy and the kinetic mechanism of action of combined treatment with n-3 FA and niacin. A better understanding of the action of these agents should lead to a clearer appreciation of the relationship between FFA flux and insulin resistance, to more effective therapy for the dyslipidemia of insulin resistance and ultimately to reduced risk for CAD in this burgeoning patient population.

Interventions

DRUGplacebo

omacor placebo plus niaspan placebo

omega-3 acid ethyl esters 4 g qd and extended release niacin, titrate up to 2 g Qpm

Sponsors

National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)
CollaboratorNIH
University of South Dakota
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to 69 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

40 and 69 years of age Male or female (without hormonal cycling as described below) BMI \> 25 Fasting serum triglycerides \> 150 mg/dL Ratio of TG/HDL-C \> 3.5

Exclusion criteria

BMIs \> 40 kg/m2 TG \> 750 mg/dL HDL-C \< 10 mg/dL Presence of other secondary causes of dyslipidemia or hyperglycemia such as hepatic, renal, thyroid or other endocrine diseases History of hypersensitivity to niacin or fish oils History of gout, hepatitis, peptic ulcer or cardiovascular disease Presence of diabetes mellitus, whether controlled by diet or drugs. (We will eliminate subjects with undiagnosed diabetes by screening for fasting glucose \> 126 mg/dL) Use of any dietary supplements providing more than 50 mg of niacin or 100 mg of n-3 FA Use of any herbal preparations or weight-loss products Taking any lipid-lowering drugs for at least four weeks prior to screening for the study Medically-required treatment with nitrates, calcium channel blockers, or adrenergic blocking agents (per the Niaspan package insert) Hemoglobin \< 12 g/dL (owing to the significant amount of blood being drawn) LDL-C \> 145 mg/dL. (This restriction will prevent the randomization of any subject whose LDL-C levels, if assigned to an n-3 FA group, might rise by 10% and thus exceed 160 mg/dL) Known substance abuse Participation in a clinical drug trial anytime during the 30 days prior to screening Anyone whom the investigators judge to be a poor candidate

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Serum TG4 monthsChange From Baseline to 4 Months in Serum Triglycerides

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Non-HDL-Cbaseline and 4 monthsChange From Baseline to 4 Months in Serum Non-HDL cholesterol

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Subjects were recruited from throughout the Sanford Clinic - Clinical Research Services in Sioux Falls by posted advertisements in public places and at sponsored health fairs.

Pre-assignment details

68 subjects willing to participate and qualified were subjected to a 6 week single blind run in period where they were given placebo omega-3 and placebo niacin. Baseline was defined as values and metrics after this run in period.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Dual Placebo
Dual placebo placebo: omacor placebo plus niaspan placebo
17
Niaspan
niaspan extended release niacin: 2 g qpm
17
Lovaza
lovaza omega-3 acid ethyl esters: 4 q qd omega-3 acid ethyl esters: 4 g qd
17
Combined Therapy
combined therapy combined treatment: omega-3 acid ethyl esters 4 g qd and extended release niacin, titrate up to 2 g Qpm
17
Total68

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Overall StudyAdverse Event0001
Overall StudyPhysician Decision1001
Overall StudyProtocol Violation1201

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicDual PlaceboNiaspanLovazaCombined TherapyTotal
Age, Continuous45 years49 years44 years48 years46 years
Sex: Female, Male
Female
7 Participants8 Participants10 Participants8 Participants33 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
10 Participants9 Participants7 Participants9 Participants35 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 150 / 150 / 170 / 13
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 150 / 150 / 170 / 13

Outcome results

Primary

Serum TG

Change From Baseline to 4 Months in Serum Triglycerides

Time frame: 4 months

Population: Those subjects with complete data baseline to end

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Dual PlaceboSerum TG233 mg/dlStandard Deviation 162
NiaspanSerum TG157 mg/dlStandard Deviation 52
LovazaSerum TG176 mg/dlStandard Deviation 63
Combined TherapySerum TG156 mg/dlStandard Deviation 56
Secondary

Non-HDL-C

Change From Baseline to 4 Months in Serum Non-HDL cholesterol

Time frame: baseline and 4 months

Population: all subjects with pre and post treatment data

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Dual PlaceboNon-HDL-C145 mg/dlStandard Deviation 23
NiaspanNon-HDL-C155 mg/dlStandard Deviation 43
LovazaNon-HDL-C133 mg/dlStandard Deviation 34
Combined TherapyNon-HDL-C170 mg/dlStandard Deviation 36

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026