Skip to content

Radiation Therapy, Amifostine, and Chemotherapy in Treating Young Patients With Newly Diagnosed Nasopharyngeal Cancer

Treatment of Childhood Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma With Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Concomitant Chemoradiotherapy: A Groupwide Phase III Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00274937
Enrollment
111
Registered
2006-01-11
Start date
2006-02-20
Completion date
2022-09-30
Last updated
2022-10-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Stage I Nasopharyngeal Keratinizing Squamous Cell Carcinoma AJCC v7, Stage I Nasopharyngeal Undifferentiated Carcinoma AJCC v7, Stage II Nasopharyngeal Keratinizing Squamous Cell Carcinoma AJCC v7, Stage II Nasopharyngeal Undifferentiated Carcinoma AJCC v7, Stage III Nasopharyngeal Keratinizing Squamous Cell Carcinoma AJCC v7, Stage III Nasopharyngeal Undifferentiated Carcinoma AJCC v7, Stage IV Nasopharyngeal Keratinizing Squamous Cell Carcinoma AJCC v7, Stage IV Nasopharyngeal Undifferentiated Carcinoma AJCC v7

Brief summary

This phase III trial is studying how well radiation therapy, amifostine, and chemotherapy work in treating young patients with newly diagnosed nasopharyngeal cancer. Radiation therapy uses high-energy x-rays to kill tumor cells. Drugs, such as amifostine, may protect normal cells from the side effects of radiation therapy. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as cisplatin and fluorouracil, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Giving radiation therapy together with amifostine and chemotherapy may kill more tumor cells.

Detailed description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. Determine the response rate, overall survival, and event-free survival of children with advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma who are treated with induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy and amifostine. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. Characterize the role of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) in the pathogenesis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma in children. II. Investigate the predictive value of the detection of EBV DNA in the peripheral blood of children with nasopharyngeal carcinoma. III. Determine the incidence of NUT rearrangements in childhood nasopharyngeal carcinoma. IV. Determine the radioprotective effect of amifostine when given daily prior to radiation therapy. OUTLINE: This is a nonrandomized, multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to stage of disease (I or IIA \[stratum I\] vs IIB-IV \[stratum II\]). STRATUM I: Patients undergo radiotherapy 5 days a week for 8 weeks. Patients also receive amifostine subcutaneously on the same days they undergo radiotherapy. STRATUM II: INDUCTION THERAPY (weeks 1-9): Patients receive cisplatin IV over 6 hours on day 1 and fluorouracil IV continuously on days 1-4. Treatment repeats every 3 weeks for 3 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients with responding or stable disease proceed to consolidation therapy. CONSOLIDATION THERAPY (weeks 10-18): Patients undergo radiotherapy and receive amifostine as in stratum I. Patients also receive cisplatin IV over 6 hours on days 1 and 22 (2 courses). After completion of study treatment, patients are followed periodically for 10 years.

Interventions

Given subcutaneously

DRUGCisplatin

Given IV

DRUGFluorouracil

Given IV

OTHERLaboratory Biomarker Analysis

Correlative studies

RADIATIONRadiation Therapy

Undergo radiotherapy

Sponsors

National Cancer Institute (NCI)
CollaboratorNIH
Children's Oncology Group
Lead SponsorNETWORK

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
No minimum to 18 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Histological diagnosis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma WHO type II or III * Stage I-IV disease * Newly diagnosed disease * Performance status * Patients ≤ 16 years of age: Lansky 60-100% * Patients \> 16 years of age: Karnofsky 60-100% * Creatinine clearance or radioisotope glomerular filtration rate ≥ 70 mL/min * Creatinine based on age/gender as follows: * No greater than 0.4 mg/dL (for patients 1 month to \< 6 months of age) * No greater than 0.5 mg/dL (for patients 6 months to \< 1 year of age) * No greater than 0.6 mg/dL (for patients 1-2 years of age) * No greater than 0.8 mg/dL (for patients \< 6 years of age) * No greater than 1.0mg/dL (for patients 6 to \< 10 years of age) * No greater than 1.2 mg/dL (for patients 10 to \< 13 years of age) * No greater than 1.4 mg/dL (for female patients 13 to ≥ 16 years of age) * No greater than 1.5 mg/dL (for male patients 13 to \< 16 years of age) * No greater than 1.7 mg/dL (for male patients ≥ 16 years of age) * Bilirubin ≤ 1.5 times upper limit of normal (ULN) for age * AST or ALT \< 2.5 times ULN for age * Not pregnant or nursing * Negative pregnancy test * Fertile patients must use effective contraception * No prior chemotherapy or radiotherapy to the nasopharynx or neck for the treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Two Year Event-free Survival (EFS)Up to Two Year After EnrollmentThe two-year event-free survival will be compared with a standard established from adult oncology data and the results of POG-9486. The two-year Kaplan-Meier estimate of event-free survival will be compared with 70% using a 1-sided test of size 0.05 using the asymptotic distribution of the complementary log-log distribution of the estimate.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Predictive Value of Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV) DNA as Measured by Quantitative Detection at Enrollment on EFS 2 Years After TreatmentAt study enrollmentPresence of EBV DNA in serum.
Prognostic Significance of EBV Viral LoadAt study enrollmentViral load in blood.
Predictive Value of the Detection of EBV DNA in the Peripheral BloodUp to 6 yearsThe prognostic value of the presence of EBV DNA will be assessed using the log-rank test, adjusted by initial stage of disease, if appropriate. The proposed analysis will take place at the analytic endpoint of the clinical trial.
Protective Effects of Amifostine Assessed Primarily by SialometryAt study enrollmentWeight of stimulated saliva production in grams.
Protective Effects of Amifostine Assessed Primarily by Sialometry: Weight of Unstimulated Saliva Production in Grams.At study enrollmentWeight of unstimulated saliva production in grams.

Countries

Australia, Canada, United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

No patients were enrolled to Stratum 1.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Stratum II
AJCC Stage IIb - IV
111
Total111

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyPhysician Decision10
Overall StudyProgressive Disease4
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject6

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicStratum II
Age, Continuous13.8 Participants
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.9
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
13 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
95 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
52 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
9 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
43 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Australia
1 participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
2 participants
Region of Enrollment
Saudi Arabia
1 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
107 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
36 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
75 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
36 / 111
serious
Total, serious adverse events
79 / 111

Outcome results

Primary

Two Year Event-free Survival (EFS)

The two-year event-free survival will be compared with a standard established from adult oncology data and the results of POG-9486. The two-year Kaplan-Meier estimate of event-free survival will be compared with 70% using a 1-sided test of size 0.05 using the asymptotic distribution of the complementary log-log distribution of the estimate.

Time frame: Up to Two Year After Enrollment

Population: No patients were enrolled to Stratum 1.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Stratum IITwo Year Event-free Survival (EFS)0.87 Estimated probability
Secondary

Predictive Value of Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV) DNA as Measured by Quantitative Detection at Enrollment on EFS 2 Years After Treatment

Presence of EBV DNA in serum.

Time frame: At study enrollment

Population: Data was and never will be collected.

Secondary

Predictive Value of the Detection of EBV DNA in the Peripheral Blood

The prognostic value of the presence of EBV DNA will be assessed using the log-rank test, adjusted by initial stage of disease, if appropriate. The proposed analysis will take place at the analytic endpoint of the clinical trial.

Time frame: Up to 6 years

Population: Funding was not obtained and results will never be reported.

Secondary

Prognostic Significance of EBV Viral Load

Viral load in blood.

Time frame: At study enrollment

Population: Data was and never will be collected.

Secondary

Protective Effects of Amifostine Assessed Primarily by Sialometry

Weight of stimulated saliva production in grams.

Time frame: At study enrollment

Population: Twenty-six patients in stratum 2 were evaluated at both study enrollment and at the end of consolidation for the weight of stimulated saliva production. This outcome measure was only collected for patients in Stratum 2.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Stratum IIProtective Effects of Amifostine Assessed Primarily by SialometryAt study Enrollment4.97 Grams of salivaStandard Deviation 5.44
Stratum IIProtective Effects of Amifostine Assessed Primarily by SialometryAt end of consolidation3.39 Grams of salivaStandard Deviation 4.71
Secondary

Protective Effects of Amifostine Assessed Primarily by Sialometry: Weight of Unstimulated Saliva Production in Grams.

Weight of unstimulated saliva production in grams.

Time frame: At study enrollment

Population: Twenty-nine patients in stratum 2 were evaluated at both study enrollment and at the end of consolidation for the weight of unstimulated saliva production. This outcome measure was only collected for patients in Stratum 2.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Stratum IIProtective Effects of Amifostine Assessed Primarily by Sialometry: Weight of Unstimulated Saliva Production in Grams.At study Enrollment3.37 Grams of salivaStandard Deviation 4.49
Stratum IIProtective Effects of Amifostine Assessed Primarily by Sialometry: Weight of Unstimulated Saliva Production in Grams.At end of consolidation2.30 Grams of salivaStandard Deviation 3.9

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 1, 2026