Early Rheumatoid Arthritis
Conditions
Keywords
Early Rheumatoid Arthritis
Brief summary
The purpose of the study is to assess the safety and efficacy of adalimumab in combination with methotrexate in patients with recent onset rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and to assess the long-term safety and maintenance of efficacy after treatment with adalimumab for up to 10 years.
Detailed description
This study had an initial 2-year double-blind treatment period followed by an 8-year open-label extension period, for a total of up to 10 years study duration. The study was designed to assess the potential of adalimumab + methotrexate to improve signs and symptoms of disease and to inhibit radiographic progression in patients with recent onset (disease duration less than 3 years) rheumatoid arthritis not previously treated with methotrexate. Adalimumab is a human anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) monoclonal antibody.
Interventions
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Subject was age 18 or older and in good health (Investigator discretion) with a recent stable medical history. * Diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) as defined by the 1987-revised American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria, with a disease duration less than 3 years, at least 8 swollen joints out of the 66 joints assessed, at least 10 tender joints out of the 68 joints assessed, at least 1 joint erosion or rheumatoid factor (RF) positivity, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) \>= 28 mm/1h or C-reactive protein (CRP) \>= 1.5 mg/dl
Exclusion criteria
* Chronic arthritis diagnosed before the age of 16 * Preceding treatment with MTX, cyclophosphamide, cyclosporin, azathioprine or more than 2 other disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) * Subject previously received anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) therapy * Permanently wheelchair-bound or bedridden patients * Subject considered by the investigator, for any reason, to be an unsuitable candidate for the study * Female subject who is pregnant or breast-feeding or considering becoming pregnant
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response Criteria at Week 52 | Baseline and 52 Weeks | American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) response. A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline were met: * ≥ 50% improvement in tender joint count; * ≥ 50% improvement in swollen joint count; and * ≥ 50% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: * Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale \[VAS\]); * Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); * Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); * Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI)); * Acute phase reactant value (C-Reactive Protein). Participants who withdrew early were considered non-responders. |
| Change From Baseline in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) at Week 52 | Baseline and Week 52 | The modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) is a measure of change in joint health. Digitized images of radiographs of hands and feet obtained at screening and Week 52 were scored in a blinded manner. Joints were scored for erosions on a scale from 0 (no damage) to 5 (complete collapse) and joint space narrowing on a scale from 0 (no damage) to 4 (ankylosis or complete dislocation). Erosion scores and narrowing scores were added to obtain the mTSS (range = 0 \[normal\] to 398 \[maximal disease\]). An increase in mTSS from Baseline represents disease progression and/or joint worsening, no change represents halting of disease progression, and a decrease represents improvement. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) at Week 104 | Baseline and Week 104 | The modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) is a measure of change in joint health. Digitized images of radiographs of hands and feet obtained at screening and Week 104 were scored in a blinded manner. Joints were scored for erosions on a scale of 0 (no damage) to 5 (complete collapse) and joint space narrowing on a scale of 0 (no damage) to 4 (ankylosis or complete dislocation). Erosion scores and narrowing scores were added to obtain the mTSS (range = 0 \[normal\] to 398 \[maximal disease\]). An increase in mTSS from Baseline represents disease progression and/or joint worsening, no change represents halting of disease progression, and a decrease represents improvement. |
| Number of Participants Who Achieved Clinical Remission, Defined as a Disease Activity 28 (DAS28) Score < 2.6 at Week 52 | Week 52 | The DAS28 is a validated index of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity. Twenty-eight tender joint counts, 28 swollen joint counts, C reactive protein, and general health were included in the DAS28 score. Scores on the DAS28 range from 0 to 10. A DAS28 score \>5.1 indicates high disease activity, a DAS28 score \<3.2 indicates low disease activity, and a DAS28 score \<2.6 indicates clinical remission. |
| Change From Baseline in the Physical Component of the Short Form-36 Health Status Survey (SF-36) at Week 52 | Baseline and Week 52 | The SF-36 determined participants' overall quality of life by assessing 1) limitations in physical functioning due to health problems; 2) limitations in usual role because of physical health problems; 3) bodily pain; 4) general health perceptions; 5) vitality; 6) limitations in social functioning because of physical or emotional problems; 7) limitations in usual role due to emotional problems; and 8) general mental health. Items 1-4 comprise the physical component of the SF-36. Scores on each item were summed and averaged (range = 0-100); increases from Baseline indicate improvement. |
| Number of Participants With Major Clinical Response After 104 Weeks of Treatment | Any 6 continuous months from Baseline to Week 104 | Major clinical response was defined as an American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) response for any six continuous months, over 104 weeks of treatment. A participant was a responder if the following criteria for improvement from Baseline were met: * ≥ 70% improvement in tender joint count; * ≥ 70% improvement in swollen joint count; and * ≥ 70% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: * Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale \[VAS\]); * Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); * Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); * Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index \[HAQ-DI\]); * Acute phase reactant value (C-Reactive Protein). Participants withdrawing early were non-responders. |
| Change From Baseline in the Mental Component of the Short Form-36 Health Status Survey (SF-36) at Week 52 | Baseline and Week 52 | The SF-36 determined participants' overall quality of life by assessing 1) limitations in physical functioning due to health problems; 2) limitations in usual role because of physical health problems; 3) bodily pain; 4) general health perceptions; 5) vitality; 6) limitations in social functioning because of physical or emotional problems; 7) limitations in usual role due to emotional problems; and 8) general mental health. Items 5-8 comprise the mental component of the SF-36. Scores on each item were summed and averaged (range = 0-100); increases from Baseline indicate improvement. |
| Number of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response Criteria at Weeks 26 and 76 | Baseline and Weeks 26 and 76 | American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) response. A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline were met: * ≥ 50% improvement in tender joint count; * ≥ 50% improvement in swollen joint count; and * ≥ 50% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: * Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale \[VAS\]); * Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); * Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); * Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index \[HAQ-DI\]); * Acute phase reactant value (C-Reactive Protein). Participants withdrawing early were considered non-responders. |
| Number of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response Criteria During the Double-blind Phase | Baseline and Weeks 26, 52, 76, and 104 | American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) response. A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline were met: * ≥ 20% improvement in tender joint count; * ≥ 20% improvement in swollen joint count; and * ≥ 20% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: * Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale \[VAS\]); * Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); * Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); * Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index \[HAQ-DI\]); * Acute phase reactant value (C-Reactive Protein). Participants withdrawing early were considered non-responders. |
| Number of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response Criteria During the Double-blind Phase | Baseline and Weeks 26, 52, 76, and 104 | American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) response. A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline were met: * ≥ 70% improvement in tender joint count; * ≥ 70% improvement in swollen joint count; and * ≥ 70% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: * Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale \[VAS\]); * Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); * Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); * Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index \[HAQ-DI\]); * Acute phase reactant value (C-Reactive Protein). Participants withdrawing early were considered non-responders. |
| Change From Baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) During the Double-blind Treatment Phase | Baseline and Weeks 12, 26, 76, and 104 | The Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index is a patient-reported questionnaire specific for rheumatoid arthritis. It consists of 20 questions referring to eight domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and daily activities. Participants assessed their ability to do each task over the past week using the following response categories: without any difficulty (0); with some difficulty (1); with much difficulty (2); and unable to do (3). Scores on each task were summed and averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 to 3, where zero represents no disability and three very severe, high-dependency disability. Negative mean changes from Baseline in the overall score indicate improvement. |
| Number of Participants With Improvement in the HAQ-DI Score ≥ 0.3 During the Double-blind Treatment Phase | Baseline and Weeks 26, 52, 76, and 104 | The Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index is a patient-reported questionnaire specific for rheumatoid arthritis. It consists of 20 questions referring to eight domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and daily activities. Participants assessed their ability to do each task over the past week using the following response categories: without any difficulty (0); with some difficulty (1); with much difficulty (2); and unable to do (3). Scores on each task were summed and averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 to 3, where zero represents no disability and three very severe, high-dependency disability. |
| Change From Baseline in Health Utilities Index Mark 2 and Mark 3 (HUI 2/3) During the Double-blind Treatment Phase | Baseline and Weeks 26, 52, and 104 | The HUI 2/3 is an assessment of various aspects of participants' health and ability to perform various tasks on a day-to-day basis, including reading, seeing, hearing, speaking, general outlook on life, pain/discomfort, ability to walk, use of hands, memory, ability to think/solve, and ability to perform basic activities such as eating, bathing, and dressing. The HUI 2/3 is a combined 15-item questionnaire based on a recall period of the previous 4 weeks. HUI-2 and HUI-3 scores are calculated independently. The HUI-2 score includes 6 attributes: Sensation, Mobility, Emotion, Cognition, Self-Care, and Pain. The HUI-3 score is comprised of 8 attributes: Vision, Hearing, Speech, Ambulation, Dexterity, Emotion, Cognition, and Pain. The range of each score is from 0 (dead) to 1 (perfect health). An increase from Baseline indicates improvement. |
| Change From Baseline in the Short Form-36 Health Status Survey (SF-36) During the Double-blind Treatment Phase | Baseline and Weeks 26 and 104 | The SF-36 determined participants' overall quality of life by assessing 1) limitations in physical functioning due to health problems; 2) limitations in usual role because of physical health problems; 3) bodily pain; 4) general health perceptions; 5) vitality; 6) limitations in social functioning because of physical or emotional problems; 7) limitations in usual role due to emotional problems; and 8) general mental health. Items 1-4 comprise the physical component and items 5-8 comprise the mental component of the SF-36. Scores on each item were summed and averaged (range = 0-100); increases from Baseline indicate improvement. |
| Numeric American College of Rheumatology (ACR-N) During the Double-blind Treatment Phase | Baseline and Weeks 26, 52, 76, and 104 | ACR-N is a composite, continuous variable which measures the percentage of improvement from Baseline in individual participants based on the 7 core set variables of the ACR. ACR-N is defined as the smallest percent change from Baseline of 3 measures: tender joint counts (TJC), swollen joint counts (SJC), and the median percent improvement in the 5 remaining measures (Patient's Assessment of Pain, Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity, Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity, Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index \[HAQ-DI\], and C-Reactive Protein). A positive ACR-N value indicates improvement; a negative ACR-N value indicates worsening; ACR-N of 0 indicates no change. |
| Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score (DAS28) During the Double-blind Treatment Phase | Baseline and Weeks 26, 52, 76, and 104 | The DAS28 is a composite score of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity derived from the following variables: * 28 tender joint counts, * 28 swollen joint counts, * C-reactive protein, and * Patient's global assessment of disease activity. Scores on the DAS28 range from 0 to 10. A DAS28 score higher than 5.1 indicates high disease activity, a DAS28 score less than 3.2 indicates low disease activity, and a DAS28 score less than 2.6 indicates clinical remission. |
| Change From Baseline in Joint Erosion Score During the Double-blind Treatment Period | Baseline and Weeks 52 and 104 | Digitized images of radiographs of hands and feet obtained at screening and during the study were scored in a blinded manner. Joints on each hand/wrist (17 joints) and each forefoot (6 joints) were scored for erosions on a scale of 0 = no erosions; 1 = 1 discrete erosion or ≤20% joint involvement; 2 = 2 separate quadrants with erosion or 21-40% joint involvement; 3 = 3 separate quadrants with erosion or 41-60% joint involvement; 4 = all 4 quadrants with erosion or 61-80% joint involvement; and 5 = extensive destruction with \>80% joint involvement. Scores were summed to calculate the total erosion score, which ranges from 0 (no erosion)to 230 (worst). A large increase in erosion score is indicative of worsening, whereas a small change or no change is indicative of inhibition of joint erosion. |
| Change From Baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 52 | Baseline and Week 52 | The Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index is a patient-reported questionnaire specific for rheumatoid arthritis. It consists of 20 questions referring to eight domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and daily activities. Participants assessed their ability to do each task over the past week using the following response categories: without any difficulty (0); with some difficulty (1); with much difficulty (2); and unable to do (3). Scores on each task were summed and averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 to 3, where zero represents no disability and three very severe, high-dependency disability. Negative mean changes from Baseline in the overall score indicate improvement. |
| Number of Participants With No Worsening in Modified Total Sharp Score or Components During the Double-blind Treatment Phase | Baseline and Weeks 52 and 104 | The number of participants with no worsening in the modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) and in erosion and joint space narrowing (JSN) scores, where no worsening is defined as a change from Baseline of ≤ 0 in mTSS, erosion score and JSN score, at Weeks 52 and 104. Digitized images of radiographs of hands and feet obtained at screening and during the study were scored in a blinded manner. Joints were scored for erosions on a scale of 0 (no damage) to 5 (complete collapse) and joint space narrowing on a scale of 0 (no damage) to 4 (ankylosis or complete dislocation). Erosion scores and narrowing scores were added to obtain the mTSS (range = 0 \[normal\] to 398 \[maximal disease\]). An increase in mTSS from Baseline represents disease progression and/or joint worsening, no change represents halting of disease progression, and a decrease represents improvement. |
| Number of Participants With No Erosions at Baseline and No New Erosions at Weeks 52 and 104 | Baseline and Weeks 52 and 104 | The number of participants with no erosions at Baseline and no erosions at Weeks 52 and 104, where no erosions and no new erosions are defined as an erosion score = 0. Digitized images of radiographs of hands and feet obtained at screening and during the study were scored in a blinded manner. Joints on each hand/wrist (17 joints) and each forefoot (6 joints) were scored for erosions on a scale of 0 = no erosions; 1 = 1 discrete erosion or ≤20% joint involvement; 2 = 2 separate quadrants with erosion or 21-40% joint involvement; 3 = 3 separate quadrants with erosion or 41-60% joint involvement; 4 = all 4 quadrants with erosion or 61-80% joint involvement; and 5 = extensive destruction with \>80% joint involvement. Scores were summed to calculate the total erosion score, which ranges from 0 (no erosion) to 230 (worst). |
| Number of Participants With Non-Involved Joints at Baseline and No Newly Involved Joints at Weeks 52 and 104 | Baseline and Weeks 52 and 104 | Number of participants with non-involved joints at Baseline and no newly involved joints at Weeks 52 and 104, where involved joints or no newly involved joints are defined as modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) = 0. Digitized images of radiographs of hands and feet obtained at screening and during the study were scored in a blinded manner. Joints were scored for erosions on a scale of 0 (no damage) to 5 (complete collapse) and joint space narrowing on a scale of 0 (no damage) to 4 (ankylosis or complete dislocation). Erosion scores and narrowing scores were added to obtain the mTSS (range = 0 \[normal\] to 398 \[maximal disease\]). |
| Number of Participants Meeting ACR20 Response Criteria Over 10 Years by Adalimumab Exposure | Baseline and after 1, 2, 5, and 10 years of adalimumab exposure. Baseline was the last value prior to the first dose of adalimumab. | American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) response. A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline were met: * ≥ 20% improvement in tender joint count; * ≥ 20% improvement in swollen joint count; and * ≥ 20% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: * Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale \[VAS\]); * Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); * Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); * Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index \[HAQ-DI\]); * Acute phase reactant value (C-Reactive Protein). Baseline is the last value prior to the first dose of adalimumab. For participants randomized to the methotrexate (MTX) arm in the double-blind (DB) phase, Baseline was the last visit prior to the first adalimumab dose at Week 106 of the open-label (OL) phase. |
| Number of Participants Meeting ACR50 Response Criteria Over 10 Years by Adalimumab Exposure | Baseline and after 1, 2, 5, and 10 years of adalimumab exposure. Baseline was the last value prior to the first dose of adalimumab. | American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) response. A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline were met: * ≥ 50% improvement in tender joint count; * ≥ 50% improvement in swollen joint count; and * ≥ 50% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: * Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale \[VAS\]); * Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); * Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); * Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index \[HAQ-DI\]); * Acute phase reactant value (C-Reactive Protein). Baseline is the last value prior to the first dose of adalimumab. For patients randomized to the methotrexate (MTX) arm in the double-blind (DB) phase, Baseline was the last visit prior to the first adalimumab dose at Week 106 of the open-label (OL) phase. |
| Number of Participants Meeting ACR70 Response Criteria Over 10 Years by Adalimumab Exposure | Baseline and after 1, 2, 5, and 10 years of adalimumab exposure. Baseline was the last value prior to the first dose of adalimumab. | American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) response. A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline were met: * ≥ 70% improvement in tender joint count; * ≥ 70% improvement in swollen joint count; and * ≥ 70% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: * Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale \[VAS\]); * Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); * Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); * Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index \[HAQ-DI\]); * Acute phase reactant value (C-Reactive Protein). Baseline is the last value prior to the first dose of adalimumab. For patients randomized to the methotrexate (MTX) arm in the double-blind (DB) phase, Baseline was the last visit prior to the first adalimumab dose at Week 106 of the open-label (OL) phase. |
| Change From Baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Over 10 Years by Adalimumab Exposure | Baseline and Years 1, 2, 5, and 10. Baseline was the last value prior to the first dose of adalimumab. For patients randomized to the MTX arm in the DB phase, Baseline was the last visit prior to the first adalimumab dose at Week 106. | The Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index is a patient-reported questionnaire specific for rheumatoid arthritis. It consists of 20 questions referring to eight domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and daily activities. Participants assessed their ability to do each task over the past week using the following response categories: without any difficulty (0); with some difficulty (1); with much difficulty (2); and unable to do (3). Scores on each task were summed and averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 to 3, where zero represents no disability and three very severe, high-dependency disability. Negative mean changes from Baseline in the overall score indicate improvement. |
| Change From Baseline in DAS28 Over 10 Years by Adalimumab Exposure | Baseline and Years 1, 2, 5, and 10. Baseline was the last value prior to the first dose of adalimumab. For patients randomized to the MTX arm in the DB phase, Baseline was the last visit prior to the first adalimumab dose at Week 106. | The DAS28 is a composite score of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity derived from the following variables: * 28 tender joint counts, * 28 swollen joint counts, * C-reactive protein, and * Patient's global assessment of disease activity. Scores on the DAS28 range from 0 to 10. A DAS28 score higher than 5.1 indicates high disease activity, a DAS28 score less than 3.2 indicates low disease activity, and a DAS28 score less than 2.6 indicates clinical remission. |
| Number of Participants With DAS28 < 2.6 and < 3.2 Over 10 Years by Adalimumab Exposure | After 1, 2, 5, and 10 years of adalimumab exposure | The DAS28 is a composite score of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity derived from the following variables: * 28 tender joint counts, * 28 swollen joint counts, * C-reactive protein, and * Patient's global assessment of disease activity. Scores on the DAS28 range from 0 to 10. A DAS28 score higher than 5.1 indicates high disease activity, a DAS28 score less than 3.2 indicates low disease activity, and a DAS28 score less than 2.6 indicates clinical remission. |
| Change From Baseline in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) Over 10 Years | Baseline (prior to first study drug treatment) and Years 2 and 10 | The modified TSS (mTSS) is a measure of change in joint health. Digitized images of radiographs of hands and feet obtained at screening and during the study were scored in a blinded manner. Joints were scored for erosions on a scale of 0 (no damage) to 5 (complete collapse) and joint space narrowing on a scale of 0 (no damage) to 4 (ankylosis or complete dislocation). Erosion scores and narrowing scores were added to obtain the mTSS (range = 0 \[normal\] to 398 \[maximal disease\]). An increase in mTSS from Baseline represents disease progression and/or joint worsening, no change represents halting of disease progression, and a decrease represents improvement. |
| Number of Participants With No Radiographic Progression Over 10 Years | Baseline (prior to first study drug treatment) and Years 2 and 10. | The modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) is a measure of change in joint health. Digitized images of radiographs of hands and feet obtained at screening and during the study were scored in a blinded manner. Joints were scored for erosions on a scale of 0 (no damage) to 5 (complete collapse) and joint space narrowing on a scale of 0 (no damage) to 4 (ankylosis or complete dislocation). Erosion scores and narrowing scores were added to obtain the mTSS (range = 0 \[normal\] to 398 \[maximal disease\]). An increase in mTSS from Baseline represents disease progression and/or joint worsening, no change represents halting of disease progression, and a decrease represents improvement. The number of participants with change from Baseline ≤ 0.5 and ≤ 0 is reported as a measure of no disease progression. |
| Composite Score of ACR50 Plus No Change in Modified Total Sharp Score | Year 10 | — |
| Number of Participants With a Major Clinical Response Over 10 Years by Adalimumab Exposure | From the first dose of adalimumab (at Week 1 or Week 106 for patients initially randomized to methotrexate in the DB phase) to Year 10 | A major clinical response was defined as maintenance of an ACR70 response for at least a 6-month continuous period at any time during the study following the first dose of adalimumab. A participant was a responder if the following criteria for improvement from Baseline were met: * ≥ 70% improvement in tender joint count; * ≥ 70% improvement in swollen joint count; and * ≥ 70% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: * Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale \[VAS\]); * Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); * Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); * Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index \[HAQ-DI\]); * Acute phase reactant value (C-Reactive Protein). |
| Number of Participants With Improvement in HAQ-DI by 0.22 and 0.5 Units Over 10 Years by Adalimumab Exposure | Baseline and Years 1, 2, 5, and 10. Baseline was the last value prior to the first dose of adalimumab. For patients randomized to the MTX arm in the DB phase, Baseline was the last visit prior to the first adalimumab dose at Week 106. | The Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) is a patient-reported questionnaire specific for rheumatoid arthritis. It consists of 20 questions referring to eight domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and daily activities. Participants assessed their ability to do each task over the past week using the following response categories: without any difficulty (0); with some difficulty (1); with much difficulty (2); and unable to do (3). Scores on each task were summed and averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 to 3, where zero represents no disability and three very severe, high-dependency disability. A decrease in the HAQ-DI score represents an improvement in physical function; a clinically significant improvement is defined as a decrease of least 0.22 from Baseline in the HAQ-DI score. The number of participants with improvement in HAQ-DI of at least 0.22 and 0.5 units from Baseline is reported. |
| Change From Baseline in Joint Space Narrowing Score During the Double-blind Treatment Period | Baseline and Weeks 52 and 104 | Digitized images of radiographs of hands and feet obtained at screening and during the study were scored in a blinded manner. Joint space narrowing (JSN) scores were recorded for each hand/wrist (16 joints) and each forefoot (5 joints) on a 5-point scale (0 = no narrowing; 1 = up to 25% narrowing; 2 = 26-65% narrowing; 3 = 66-99% narrowing; and 4 = complete narrowing). Scores were summed to calculate the total score ranging from 0 (no narrowing) to 168 (maximum narrowing). A large increase in joint narrowing score is indicative of worsening, whereas a small change or no change is indicative of inhibition of JSN. |
| Number of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response Criteria at Week 104 | Baseline and Week 104 | American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) response. A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline were met: * ≥ 50% improvement in tender joint count; * ≥ 50% improvement in swollen joint count; and * ≥ 50% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: * Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale \[VAS\]); * Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); * Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); * Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index \[HAQ-DI\]); * Acute phase reactant value (C-Reactive Protein). Participants withdrawing early were considered non-responders. |
Countries
Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Czechia, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Netherlands, Norway, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, United States
Participant flow
Recruitment details
Patients were enrolled at 94 sites in 15 countries between January 2001 and April 2004.
Pre-assignment details
Patients who had been receiving a previous disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) participated in a 4-week washout period during which the DMARD was withdrawn. Otherwise, there was a one-week washout period after the Screening visit.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Methotrexate Participants received placebo to adalimumab subcutaneous injection once every other week and methotrexate orally once a week at a starting dose of 7.5 mg/week (could be escalated up to 20 mg/week) during the 2-year double-blind treatment phase. Participants received adalimumab 40 mg every other week for up to 8 years in the open-label extension phase. | 257 |
| Adalimumab Participants received adalimumab 40 mg subcutaneous injection once every other week and placebo to methotrexate orally once a week during the 2-year double-blind treatment phase and then adalimumab 40 mg every other week for up to 8 years in the open-label extension. | 274 |
| Adalimumab + Methotrexate Participants received adalimumab 40 mg subcutaneous injection once every other week and methotrexate orally once a week at a starting dose of 7.5 mg/week (could be escalated up to 20 mg/week) during the 2-year double-blind treatment phase. Participants received adalimumab 40 mg every other week for up to 8 years in the open-label extension phase. | 268 |
| Total | 799 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 | FG002 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-year Double-blind Treatment Period | Administrative reasons | 3 | 2 | 9 |
| 2-year Double-blind Treatment Period | Adverse Event | 21 | 27 | 32 |
| 2-year Double-blind Treatment Period | Death | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| 2-year Double-blind Treatment Period | Lack of Efficacy | 47 | 52 | 13 |
| 2-year Double-blind Treatment Period | Lost to Follow-up | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 2-year Double-blind Treatment Period | Planned selection criteria | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| 2-year Double-blind Treatment Period | Protocol Violation | 6 | 6 | 4 |
| 2-year Double-blind Treatment Period | Recovery | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| 2-year Double-blind Treatment Period | Withdrawal by Subject | 15 | 18 | 12 |
| Open-Label Extension Period | Administrative reasons | 11 | 11 | 13 |
| Open-Label Extension Period | Adverse Event | 21 | 32 | 36 |
| Open-Label Extension Period | Death | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| Open-Label Extension Period | Lack of Efficacy | 14 | 6 | 12 |
| Open-Label Extension Period | Lost to Follow-up | 9 | 2 | 6 |
| Open-Label Extension Period | Protocol Violation | 3 | 4 | 4 |
| Open-Label Extension Period | Recovery | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Open-Label Extension Period | Withdrawal by Subject | 16 | 15 | 22 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Methotrexate | Adalimumab | Adalimumab + Methotrexate | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age Continuous | 52.0 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.1 | 52.1 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.5 | 51.9 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 14 | 52.0 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.5 |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 190 Participants | 212 Participants | 193 Participants | 595 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 67 Participants | 62 Participants | 75 Participants | 204 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk | EG003 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — | — / — | — / — | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 227 / 257 | 227 / 274 | 241 / 268 | 634 / 697 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 47 / 257 | 65 / 274 | 56 / 268 | 320 / 697 |
Outcome results
Change From Baseline in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) at Week 52
The modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) is a measure of change in joint health. Digitized images of radiographs of hands and feet obtained at screening and Week 52 were scored in a blinded manner. Joints were scored for erosions on a scale from 0 (no damage) to 5 (complete collapse) and joint space narrowing on a scale from 0 (no damage) to 4 (ankylosis or complete dislocation). Erosion scores and narrowing scores were added to obtain the mTSS (range = 0 \[normal\] to 398 \[maximal disease\]). An increase in mTSS from Baseline represents disease progression and/or joint worsening, no change represents halting of disease progression, and a decrease represents improvement.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 52
Population: Full analysis set. For participants with missing data, mTSS was imputed by linear extrapolation.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Methotrexate | Change From Baseline in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) at Week 52 | 5.7 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.7 |
| Adalimumab | Change From Baseline in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) at Week 52 | 3.0 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.2 |
| Adalimumab + Methotrexate | Change From Baseline in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) at Week 52 | 1.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.5 |
Number of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response Criteria at Week 52
American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) response. A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline were met: * ≥ 50% improvement in tender joint count; * ≥ 50% improvement in swollen joint count; and * ≥ 50% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: * Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale \[VAS\]); * Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); * Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); * Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI)); * Acute phase reactant value (C-Reactive Protein). Participants who withdrew early were considered non-responders.
Time frame: Baseline and 52 Weeks
Population: The Full Analysis Set consisted of all patients who were randomized and who received at least one dose of double-blinded study medication. Participants with insufficient data to calculate ACR50 at Week 52 or who withdrew early were considered non-responders.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Methotrexate | Number of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response Criteria at Week 52 | 118 participants |
| Adalimumab | Number of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response Criteria at Week 52 | 113 participants |
| Adalimumab + Methotrexate | Number of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response Criteria at Week 52 | 165 participants |
Change From Baseline in DAS28 Over 10 Years by Adalimumab Exposure
The DAS28 is a composite score of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity derived from the following variables: * 28 tender joint counts, * 28 swollen joint counts, * C-reactive protein, and * Patient's global assessment of disease activity. Scores on the DAS28 range from 0 to 10. A DAS28 score higher than 5.1 indicates high disease activity, a DAS28 score less than 3.2 indicates low disease activity, and a DAS28 score less than 2.6 indicates clinical remission.
Time frame: Baseline and Years 1, 2, 5, and 10. Baseline was the last value prior to the first dose of adalimumab. For patients randomized to the MTX arm in the DB phase, Baseline was the last visit prior to the first adalimumab dose at Week 106.
Population: ITT Analysis Set, with available data. N indicates patients with non-missing data at Baseline and the specified time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Methotrexate | Change From Baseline in DAS28 Over 10 Years by Adalimumab Exposure | Year 1 [N=403] | -3.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.49 |
| Methotrexate | Change From Baseline in DAS28 Over 10 Years by Adalimumab Exposure | Year 2 [N=386] | -3.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.61 |
| Methotrexate | Change From Baseline in DAS28 Over 10 Years by Adalimumab Exposure | Year 5 [N=330] | -2.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.93 |
| Methotrexate | Change From Baseline in DAS28 Over 10 Years by Adalimumab Exposure | Year 10 [N=158] | -3.9 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.29 |
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score (DAS28) During the Double-blind Treatment Phase
The DAS28 is a composite score of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity derived from the following variables: * 28 tender joint counts, * 28 swollen joint counts, * C-reactive protein, and * Patient's global assessment of disease activity. Scores on the DAS28 range from 0 to 10. A DAS28 score higher than 5.1 indicates high disease activity, a DAS28 score less than 3.2 indicates low disease activity, and a DAS28 score less than 2.6 indicates clinical remission.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 26, 52, 76, and 104
Population: Full analysis set with available data.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Methotrexate | Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score (DAS28) During the Double-blind Treatment Phase | Week 26 [N=209, 218, 229] | -2.6 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.3 |
| Methotrexate | Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score (DAS28) During the Double-blind Treatment Phase | Week 52 [N=184, 185, 206] | -2.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.4 |
| Methotrexate | Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score (DAS28) During the Double-blind Treatment Phase | Week 76 [N=173, 173, 197] | -3.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.2 |
| Methotrexate | Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score (DAS28) During the Double-blind Treatment Phase | Week 104 [N=161, 158, 191] | -3.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.4 |
| Adalimumab | Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score (DAS28) During the Double-blind Treatment Phase | Week 104 [N=161, 158, 191] | -3.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.4 |
| Adalimumab | Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score (DAS28) During the Double-blind Treatment Phase | Week 26 [N=209, 218, 229] | -2.4 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.4 |
| Adalimumab | Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score (DAS28) During the Double-blind Treatment Phase | Week 76 [N=173, 173, 197] | -3.0 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.5 |
| Adalimumab | Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score (DAS28) During the Double-blind Treatment Phase | Week 52 [N=184, 185, 206] | -2.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.5 |
| Adalimumab + Methotrexate | Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score (DAS28) During the Double-blind Treatment Phase | Week 104 [N=161, 158, 191] | -3.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.3 |
| Adalimumab + Methotrexate | Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score (DAS28) During the Double-blind Treatment Phase | Week 52 [N=184, 185, 206] | -3.6 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.3 |
| Adalimumab + Methotrexate | Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score (DAS28) During the Double-blind Treatment Phase | Week 76 [N=173, 173, 197] | -3.7 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.3 |
| Adalimumab + Methotrexate | Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score (DAS28) During the Double-blind Treatment Phase | Week 26 [N=209, 218, 229] | -3.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.3 |
Change From Baseline in Health Utilities Index Mark 2 and Mark 3 (HUI 2/3) During the Double-blind Treatment Phase
The HUI 2/3 is an assessment of various aspects of participants' health and ability to perform various tasks on a day-to-day basis, including reading, seeing, hearing, speaking, general outlook on life, pain/discomfort, ability to walk, use of hands, memory, ability to think/solve, and ability to perform basic activities such as eating, bathing, and dressing. The HUI 2/3 is a combined 15-item questionnaire based on a recall period of the previous 4 weeks. HUI-2 and HUI-3 scores are calculated independently. The HUI-2 score includes 6 attributes: Sensation, Mobility, Emotion, Cognition, Self-Care, and Pain. The HUI-3 score is comprised of 8 attributes: Vision, Hearing, Speech, Ambulation, Dexterity, Emotion, Cognition, and Pain. The range of each score is from 0 (dead) to 1 (perfect health). An increase from Baseline indicates improvement.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 26, 52, and 104
Population: Full analysis set with available data.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Methotrexate | Change From Baseline in Health Utilities Index Mark 2 and Mark 3 (HUI 2/3) During the Double-blind Treatment Phase | HUI-2: Week 26 [N=192, 187, 205] | 0.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.2 |
| Methotrexate | Change From Baseline in Health Utilities Index Mark 2 and Mark 3 (HUI 2/3) During the Double-blind Treatment Phase | HUI-2: Week 52 [N=179, 162, 189] | 0.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.2 |
| Methotrexate | Change From Baseline in Health Utilities Index Mark 2 and Mark 3 (HUI 2/3) During the Double-blind Treatment Phase | HUI-2: Week 104 [N=152, 136, 174] | 0.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.2 |
| Methotrexate | Change From Baseline in Health Utilities Index Mark 2 and Mark 3 (HUI 2/3) During the Double-blind Treatment Phase | HUI-3: Week 26 [N=192, 189, 205] | 0.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.3 |
| Methotrexate | Change From Baseline in Health Utilities Index Mark 2 and Mark 3 (HUI 2/3) During the Double-blind Treatment Phase | HUI-3: Week 52 [N=177, 164, 190] | 0.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.3 |
| Methotrexate | Change From Baseline in Health Utilities Index Mark 2 and Mark 3 (HUI 2/3) During the Double-blind Treatment Phase | HUI-3: Week 104 [N=154, 138, 177] | 0.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.2 |
| Adalimumab | Change From Baseline in Health Utilities Index Mark 2 and Mark 3 (HUI 2/3) During the Double-blind Treatment Phase | HUI-3: Week 104 [N=154, 138, 177] | 0.4 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.3 |
| Adalimumab | Change From Baseline in Health Utilities Index Mark 2 and Mark 3 (HUI 2/3) During the Double-blind Treatment Phase | HUI-2: Week 26 [N=192, 187, 205] | 0.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.2 |
| Adalimumab | Change From Baseline in Health Utilities Index Mark 2 and Mark 3 (HUI 2/3) During the Double-blind Treatment Phase | HUI-3: Week 26 [N=192, 189, 205] | 0.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.3 |
| Adalimumab | Change From Baseline in Health Utilities Index Mark 2 and Mark 3 (HUI 2/3) During the Double-blind Treatment Phase | HUI-3: Week 52 [N=177, 164, 190] | 0.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.3 |
| Adalimumab | Change From Baseline in Health Utilities Index Mark 2 and Mark 3 (HUI 2/3) During the Double-blind Treatment Phase | HUI-2: Week 52 [N=179, 162, 189] | 0.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.2 |
| Adalimumab | Change From Baseline in Health Utilities Index Mark 2 and Mark 3 (HUI 2/3) During the Double-blind Treatment Phase | HUI-2: Week 104 [N=152, 136, 174] | 0.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.2 |
| Adalimumab + Methotrexate | Change From Baseline in Health Utilities Index Mark 2 and Mark 3 (HUI 2/3) During the Double-blind Treatment Phase | HUI-2: Week 52 [N=179, 162, 189] | 0.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.2 |
| Adalimumab + Methotrexate | Change From Baseline in Health Utilities Index Mark 2 and Mark 3 (HUI 2/3) During the Double-blind Treatment Phase | HUI-2: Week 104 [N=152, 136, 174] | 0.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.2 |
| Adalimumab + Methotrexate | Change From Baseline in Health Utilities Index Mark 2 and Mark 3 (HUI 2/3) During the Double-blind Treatment Phase | HUI-3: Week 104 [N=154, 138, 177] | 0.4 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.3 |
| Adalimumab + Methotrexate | Change From Baseline in Health Utilities Index Mark 2 and Mark 3 (HUI 2/3) During the Double-blind Treatment Phase | HUI-3: Week 26 [N=192, 189, 205] | 0.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.3 |
| Adalimumab + Methotrexate | Change From Baseline in Health Utilities Index Mark 2 and Mark 3 (HUI 2/3) During the Double-blind Treatment Phase | HUI-2: Week 26 [N=192, 187, 205] | 0.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.2 |
| Adalimumab + Methotrexate | Change From Baseline in Health Utilities Index Mark 2 and Mark 3 (HUI 2/3) During the Double-blind Treatment Phase | HUI-3: Week 52 [N=177, 164, 190] | 0.4 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.3 |
Change From Baseline in Joint Erosion Score During the Double-blind Treatment Period
Digitized images of radiographs of hands and feet obtained at screening and during the study were scored in a blinded manner. Joints on each hand/wrist (17 joints) and each forefoot (6 joints) were scored for erosions on a scale of 0 = no erosions; 1 = 1 discrete erosion or ≤20% joint involvement; 2 = 2 separate quadrants with erosion or 21-40% joint involvement; 3 = 3 separate quadrants with erosion or 41-60% joint involvement; 4 = all 4 quadrants with erosion or 61-80% joint involvement; and 5 = extensive destruction with \>80% joint involvement. Scores were summed to calculate the total erosion score, which ranges from 0 (no erosion)to 230 (worst). A large increase in erosion score is indicative of worsening, whereas a small change or no change is indicative of inhibition of joint erosion.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 52 and 104
Population: Full analysis set. Missing values were imputed.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Methotrexate | Change From Baseline in Joint Erosion Score During the Double-blind Treatment Period | Week 52 | 3.7 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.4 |
| Methotrexate | Change From Baseline in Joint Erosion Score During the Double-blind Treatment Period | Week 104 | 6.4 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 14.3 |
| Adalimumab | Change From Baseline in Joint Erosion Score During the Double-blind Treatment Period | Week 52 | 1.7 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.7 |
| Adalimumab | Change From Baseline in Joint Erosion Score During the Double-blind Treatment Period | Week 104 | 3.0 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.3 |
| Adalimumab + Methotrexate | Change From Baseline in Joint Erosion Score During the Double-blind Treatment Period | Week 52 | 0.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.3 |
| Adalimumab + Methotrexate | Change From Baseline in Joint Erosion Score During the Double-blind Treatment Period | Week 104 | 1.0 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.7 |
Change From Baseline in Joint Space Narrowing Score During the Double-blind Treatment Period
Digitized images of radiographs of hands and feet obtained at screening and during the study were scored in a blinded manner. Joint space narrowing (JSN) scores were recorded for each hand/wrist (16 joints) and each forefoot (5 joints) on a 5-point scale (0 = no narrowing; 1 = up to 25% narrowing; 2 = 26-65% narrowing; 3 = 66-99% narrowing; and 4 = complete narrowing). Scores were summed to calculate the total score ranging from 0 (no narrowing) to 168 (maximum narrowing). A large increase in joint narrowing score is indicative of worsening, whereas a small change or no change is indicative of inhibition of JSN.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 52 and 104
Population: Full analysis set. Missing values were imputed.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Methotrexate | Change From Baseline in Joint Space Narrowing Score During the Double-blind Treatment Period | Week 52 | 2.0 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.3 |
| Methotrexate | Change From Baseline in Joint Space Narrowing Score During the Double-blind Treatment Period | Week 104 | 4.0 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.9 |
| Adalimumab | Change From Baseline in Joint Space Narrowing Score During the Double-blind Treatment Period | Week 52 | 1.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.6 |
| Adalimumab | Change From Baseline in Joint Space Narrowing Score During the Double-blind Treatment Period | Week 104 | 2.6 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.5 |
| Adalimumab + Methotrexate | Change From Baseline in Joint Space Narrowing Score During the Double-blind Treatment Period | Week 52 | 0.5 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.2 |
| Adalimumab + Methotrexate | Change From Baseline in Joint Space Narrowing Score During the Double-blind Treatment Period | Week 104 | 0.9 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.1 |
Change From Baseline in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) at Week 104
The modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) is a measure of change in joint health. Digitized images of radiographs of hands and feet obtained at screening and Week 104 were scored in a blinded manner. Joints were scored for erosions on a scale of 0 (no damage) to 5 (complete collapse) and joint space narrowing on a scale of 0 (no damage) to 4 (ankylosis or complete dislocation). Erosion scores and narrowing scores were added to obtain the mTSS (range = 0 \[normal\] to 398 \[maximal disease\]). An increase in mTSS from Baseline represents disease progression and/or joint worsening, no change represents halting of disease progression, and a decrease represents improvement.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 104
Population: Full analysis set. For participants with missing data, mTSS was imputed by linear extrapolation.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Methotrexate | Change From Baseline in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) at Week 104 | 10.4 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 21.7 |
| Adalimumab | Change From Baseline in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) at Week 104 | 5.5 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 15.8 |
| Adalimumab + Methotrexate | Change From Baseline in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) at Week 104 | 1.9 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.3 |
Change From Baseline in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) Over 10 Years
The modified TSS (mTSS) is a measure of change in joint health. Digitized images of radiographs of hands and feet obtained at screening and during the study were scored in a blinded manner. Joints were scored for erosions on a scale of 0 (no damage) to 5 (complete collapse) and joint space narrowing on a scale of 0 (no damage) to 4 (ankylosis or complete dislocation). Erosion scores and narrowing scores were added to obtain the mTSS (range = 0 \[normal\] to 398 \[maximal disease\]). An increase in mTSS from Baseline represents disease progression and/or joint worsening, no change represents halting of disease progression, and a decrease represents improvement.
Time frame: Baseline (prior to first study drug treatment) and Years 2 and 10
Population: ITT Analysis Set, with available data. N indicates patients with non-missing radiographic data at each time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Methotrexate | Change From Baseline in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) Over 10 Years | Year 2 [N=83, 92, 89] | 6.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.44 |
| Methotrexate | Change From Baseline in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) Over 10 Years | Year 10 [N= 83, 93, 90] | 10.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.01 |
| Adalimumab | Change From Baseline in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) Over 10 Years | Year 10 [N= 83, 93, 90] | 9.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 15.21 |
| Adalimumab | Change From Baseline in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) Over 10 Years | Year 2 [N=83, 92, 89] | 5.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.63 |
| Adalimumab + Methotrexate | Change From Baseline in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) Over 10 Years | Year 2 [N=83, 92, 89] | 0.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3 |
| Adalimumab + Methotrexate | Change From Baseline in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) Over 10 Years | Year 10 [N= 83, 93, 90] | 3.9 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.64 |
Change From Baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 52
The Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index is a patient-reported questionnaire specific for rheumatoid arthritis. It consists of 20 questions referring to eight domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and daily activities. Participants assessed their ability to do each task over the past week using the following response categories: without any difficulty (0); with some difficulty (1); with much difficulty (2); and unable to do (3). Scores on each task were summed and averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 to 3, where zero represents no disability and three very severe, high-dependency disability. Negative mean changes from Baseline in the overall score indicate improvement.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 52
Population: Full analysis set with available data.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Methotrexate | Change From Baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 52 | -0.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.6 |
| Adalimumab | Change From Baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 52 | -0.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.7 |
| Adalimumab + Methotrexate | Change From Baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 52 | -1.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.6 |
Change From Baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) During the Double-blind Treatment Phase
The Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index is a patient-reported questionnaire specific for rheumatoid arthritis. It consists of 20 questions referring to eight domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and daily activities. Participants assessed their ability to do each task over the past week using the following response categories: without any difficulty (0); with some difficulty (1); with much difficulty (2); and unable to do (3). Scores on each task were summed and averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 to 3, where zero represents no disability and three very severe, high-dependency disability. Negative mean changes from Baseline in the overall score indicate improvement.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 12, 26, 76, and 104
Population: Full analysis set with available data.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Methotrexate | Change From Baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) During the Double-blind Treatment Phase | Week 12 [N=236, 246, 252] | -0.6 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.6 |
| Methotrexate | Change From Baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) During the Double-blind Treatment Phase | Week 26 [N=217, 222, 240] | -0.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.6 |
| Methotrexate | Change From Baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) During the Double-blind Treatment Phase | Week 76 [N= 176, 175, 207] | -0.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.6 |
| Methotrexate | Change From Baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) During the Double-blind Treatment Phase | Week 104 [166, 162, 201] | -0.9 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.6 |
| Adalimumab | Change From Baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) During the Double-blind Treatment Phase | Week 104 [166, 162, 201] | -0.9 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.6 |
| Adalimumab | Change From Baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) During the Double-blind Treatment Phase | Week 12 [N=236, 246, 252] | -0.6 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.6 |
| Adalimumab | Change From Baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) During the Double-blind Treatment Phase | Week 76 [N= 176, 175, 207] | -0.9 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.7 |
| Adalimumab | Change From Baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) During the Double-blind Treatment Phase | Week 26 [N=217, 222, 240] | -0.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.7 |
| Adalimumab + Methotrexate | Change From Baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) During the Double-blind Treatment Phase | Week 104 [166, 162, 201] | -1.0 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.7 |
| Adalimumab + Methotrexate | Change From Baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) During the Double-blind Treatment Phase | Week 26 [N=217, 222, 240] | -0.9 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.6 |
| Adalimumab + Methotrexate | Change From Baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) During the Double-blind Treatment Phase | Week 76 [N= 176, 175, 207] | -1.0 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.7 |
| Adalimumab + Methotrexate | Change From Baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) During the Double-blind Treatment Phase | Week 12 [N=236, 246, 252] | -0.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.6 |
Change From Baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Over 10 Years by Adalimumab Exposure
The Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index is a patient-reported questionnaire specific for rheumatoid arthritis. It consists of 20 questions referring to eight domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and daily activities. Participants assessed their ability to do each task over the past week using the following response categories: without any difficulty (0); with some difficulty (1); with much difficulty (2); and unable to do (3). Scores on each task were summed and averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 to 3, where zero represents no disability and three very severe, high-dependency disability. Negative mean changes from Baseline in the overall score indicate improvement.
Time frame: Baseline and Years 1, 2, 5, and 10. Baseline was the last value prior to the first dose of adalimumab. For patients randomized to the MTX arm in the DB phase, Baseline was the last visit prior to the first adalimumab dose at Week 106.
Population: ITT Analysis Set, with available data. N indicates patients with non-missing data at each time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Methotrexate | Change From Baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Over 10 Years by Adalimumab Exposure | Year 1 [N=407] | -0.9 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.68 |
| Methotrexate | Change From Baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Over 10 Years by Adalimumab Exposure | Year 2 [N=390] | -0.9 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.7 |
| Methotrexate | Change From Baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Over 10 Years by Adalimumab Exposure | Year 5 [N=344] | -0.7 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.73 |
| Methotrexate | Change From Baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Over 10 Years by Adalimumab Exposure | Year 10 [N=170] | -0.9 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.73 |
Change From Baseline in the Mental Component of the Short Form-36 Health Status Survey (SF-36) at Week 52
The SF-36 determined participants' overall quality of life by assessing 1) limitations in physical functioning due to health problems; 2) limitations in usual role because of physical health problems; 3) bodily pain; 4) general health perceptions; 5) vitality; 6) limitations in social functioning because of physical or emotional problems; 7) limitations in usual role due to emotional problems; and 8) general mental health. Items 5-8 comprise the mental component of the SF-36. Scores on each item were summed and averaged (range = 0-100); increases from Baseline indicate improvement.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 52
Population: Full analysis set with available data.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Methotrexate | Change From Baseline in the Mental Component of the Short Form-36 Health Status Survey (SF-36) at Week 52 | 6.5 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 11 |
| Adalimumab | Change From Baseline in the Mental Component of the Short Form-36 Health Status Survey (SF-36) at Week 52 | 7.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.3 |
| Adalimumab + Methotrexate | Change From Baseline in the Mental Component of the Short Form-36 Health Status Survey (SF-36) at Week 52 | 7.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 13.1 |
Change From Baseline in the Physical Component of the Short Form-36 Health Status Survey (SF-36) at Week 52
The SF-36 determined participants' overall quality of life by assessing 1) limitations in physical functioning due to health problems; 2) limitations in usual role because of physical health problems; 3) bodily pain; 4) general health perceptions; 5) vitality; 6) limitations in social functioning because of physical or emotional problems; 7) limitations in usual role due to emotional problems; and 8) general mental health. Items 1-4 comprise the physical component of the SF-36. Scores on each item were summed and averaged (range = 0-100); increases from Baseline indicate improvement.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 52
Population: Full analysis set with available data.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Methotrexate | Change From Baseline in the Physical Component of the Short Form-36 Health Status Survey (SF-36) at Week 52 | 12.5 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.6 |
| Adalimumab | Change From Baseline in the Physical Component of the Short Form-36 Health Status Survey (SF-36) at Week 52 | 12.6 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 10 |
| Adalimumab + Methotrexate | Change From Baseline in the Physical Component of the Short Form-36 Health Status Survey (SF-36) at Week 52 | 16.7 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.2 |
Change From Baseline in the Short Form-36 Health Status Survey (SF-36) During the Double-blind Treatment Phase
The SF-36 determined participants' overall quality of life by assessing 1) limitations in physical functioning due to health problems; 2) limitations in usual role because of physical health problems; 3) bodily pain; 4) general health perceptions; 5) vitality; 6) limitations in social functioning because of physical or emotional problems; 7) limitations in usual role due to emotional problems; and 8) general mental health. Items 1-4 comprise the physical component and items 5-8 comprise the mental component of the SF-36. Scores on each item were summed and averaged (range = 0-100); increases from Baseline indicate improvement.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 26 and 104
Population: Full analysis set with available data.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Methotrexate | Change From Baseline in the Short Form-36 Health Status Survey (SF-36) During the Double-blind Treatment Phase | Physical Component: Week 26 [N=199, 204, 221] | 11.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 10 |
| Methotrexate | Change From Baseline in the Short Form-36 Health Status Survey (SF-36) During the Double-blind Treatment Phase | Physical Component: Week 104 [160, 157, 189] | 12.4 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.3 |
| Methotrexate | Change From Baseline in the Short Form-36 Health Status Survey (SF-36) During the Double-blind Treatment Phase | Mental Component: Week 26 [N=199, 204, 221] | 7.0 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.6 |
| Methotrexate | Change From Baseline in the Short Form-36 Health Status Survey (SF-36) During the Double-blind Treatment Phase | Mental Component: Week 104 [N=160, 157, 189] | 8.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.9 |
| Adalimumab | Change From Baseline in the Short Form-36 Health Status Survey (SF-36) During the Double-blind Treatment Phase | Mental Component: Week 104 [N=160, 157, 189] | 6.6 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 13.5 |
| Adalimumab | Change From Baseline in the Short Form-36 Health Status Survey (SF-36) During the Double-blind Treatment Phase | Physical Component: Week 26 [N=199, 204, 221] | 10.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.2 |
| Adalimumab | Change From Baseline in the Short Form-36 Health Status Survey (SF-36) During the Double-blind Treatment Phase | Mental Component: Week 26 [N=199, 204, 221] | 5.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 13.5 |
| Adalimumab | Change From Baseline in the Short Form-36 Health Status Survey (SF-36) During the Double-blind Treatment Phase | Physical Component: Week 104 [160, 157, 189] | 13.4 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.7 |
| Adalimumab + Methotrexate | Change From Baseline in the Short Form-36 Health Status Survey (SF-36) During the Double-blind Treatment Phase | Mental Component: Week 104 [N=160, 157, 189] | 6.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 12 |
| Adalimumab + Methotrexate | Change From Baseline in the Short Form-36 Health Status Survey (SF-36) During the Double-blind Treatment Phase | Physical Component: Week 104 [160, 157, 189] | 16.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.2 |
| Adalimumab + Methotrexate | Change From Baseline in the Short Form-36 Health Status Survey (SF-36) During the Double-blind Treatment Phase | Mental Component: Week 26 [N=199, 204, 221] | 6.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.1 |
| Adalimumab + Methotrexate | Change From Baseline in the Short Form-36 Health Status Survey (SF-36) During the Double-blind Treatment Phase | Physical Component: Week 26 [N=199, 204, 221] | 14.7 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.2 |
Composite Score of ACR50 Plus No Change in Modified Total Sharp Score
Time frame: Year 10
Population: This outcome measure was not analyzed due to a protocol amendment.
Number of Participants Meeting ACR20 Response Criteria Over 10 Years by Adalimumab Exposure
American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) response. A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline were met: * ≥ 20% improvement in tender joint count; * ≥ 20% improvement in swollen joint count; and * ≥ 20% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: * Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale \[VAS\]); * Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); * Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); * Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index \[HAQ-DI\]); * Acute phase reactant value (C-Reactive Protein). Baseline is the last value prior to the first dose of adalimumab. For participants randomized to the methotrexate (MTX) arm in the double-blind (DB) phase, Baseline was the last visit prior to the first adalimumab dose at Week 106 of the open-label (OL) phase.
Time frame: Baseline and after 1, 2, 5, and 10 years of adalimumab exposure. Baseline was the last value prior to the first dose of adalimumab.
Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) Analysis Set (all patients who received at least 1 dose of adalimumab during the study, including patients who received their first dose during the DB phase and those who received MTX during the DB phase and adalimumab in the OL phase) with available ACR data. N indicates patients with non-missing data at each time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Methotrexate | Number of Participants Meeting ACR20 Response Criteria Over 10 Years by Adalimumab Exposure | Year 5 [N=325] | 231 participants |
| Methotrexate | Number of Participants Meeting ACR20 Response Criteria Over 10 Years by Adalimumab Exposure | Year 1 [N=410] | 340 participants |
| Methotrexate | Number of Participants Meeting ACR20 Response Criteria Over 10 Years by Adalimumab Exposure | Year 2 [N=385] | 332 participants |
| Methotrexate | Number of Participants Meeting ACR20 Response Criteria Over 10 Years by Adalimumab Exposure | Year 10 [N=170] | 154 participants |
Number of Participants Meeting ACR50 Response Criteria Over 10 Years by Adalimumab Exposure
American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) response. A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline were met: * ≥ 50% improvement in tender joint count; * ≥ 50% improvement in swollen joint count; and * ≥ 50% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: * Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale \[VAS\]); * Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); * Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); * Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index \[HAQ-DI\]); * Acute phase reactant value (C-Reactive Protein). Baseline is the last value prior to the first dose of adalimumab. For patients randomized to the methotrexate (MTX) arm in the double-blind (DB) phase, Baseline was the last visit prior to the first adalimumab dose at Week 106 of the open-label (OL) phase.
Time frame: Baseline and after 1, 2, 5, and 10 years of adalimumab exposure. Baseline was the last value prior to the first dose of adalimumab.
Population: ITT Analysis Set with available ACR data. N indicates patients with non-missing data at each time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Methotrexate | Number of Participants Meeting ACR50 Response Criteria Over 10 Years by Adalimumab Exposure | Year 1 [N=410] | 269 participants |
| Methotrexate | Number of Participants Meeting ACR50 Response Criteria Over 10 Years by Adalimumab Exposure | Year 2 [N=385] | 266 participants |
| Methotrexate | Number of Participants Meeting ACR50 Response Criteria Over 10 Years by Adalimumab Exposure | Year 5 [N=325] | 194 participants |
| Methotrexate | Number of Participants Meeting ACR50 Response Criteria Over 10 Years by Adalimumab Exposure | Year 10 [N=170] | 127 participants |
Number of Participants Meeting ACR70 Response Criteria Over 10 Years by Adalimumab Exposure
American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) response. A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline were met: * ≥ 70% improvement in tender joint count; * ≥ 70% improvement in swollen joint count; and * ≥ 70% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: * Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale \[VAS\]); * Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); * Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); * Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index \[HAQ-DI\]); * Acute phase reactant value (C-Reactive Protein). Baseline is the last value prior to the first dose of adalimumab. For patients randomized to the methotrexate (MTX) arm in the double-blind (DB) phase, Baseline was the last visit prior to the first adalimumab dose at Week 106 of the open-label (OL) phase.
Time frame: Baseline and after 1, 2, 5, and 10 years of adalimumab exposure. Baseline was the last value prior to the first dose of adalimumab.
Population: ITT Analysis Set with available data. N indicates patients with non-missing data at each time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Methotrexate | Number of Participants Meeting ACR70 Response Criteria Over 10 Years by Adalimumab Exposure | Year 1 [N=410] | 186 participants |
| Methotrexate | Number of Participants Meeting ACR70 Response Criteria Over 10 Years by Adalimumab Exposure | Year 2 [N=385] | 207 participants |
| Methotrexate | Number of Participants Meeting ACR70 Response Criteria Over 10 Years by Adalimumab Exposure | Year 5 [N=325] | 153 participants |
| Methotrexate | Number of Participants Meeting ACR70 Response Criteria Over 10 Years by Adalimumab Exposure | Year 10 [N=170] | 102 participants |
Number of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response Criteria During the Double-blind Phase
American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) response. A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline were met: * ≥ 20% improvement in tender joint count; * ≥ 20% improvement in swollen joint count; and * ≥ 20% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: * Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale \[VAS\]); * Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); * Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); * Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index \[HAQ-DI\]); * Acute phase reactant value (C-Reactive Protein). Participants withdrawing early were considered non-responders.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 26, 52, 76, and 104
Population: Full analysis set. Participants with insufficient data to calculate ACR20 or who withdrew early were considered non-responders.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Methotrexate | Number of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response Criteria During the Double-blind Phase | Week 26 | 158 participants |
| Methotrexate | Number of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response Criteria During the Double-blind Phase | Week 52 | 161 participants |
| Methotrexate | Number of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response Criteria During the Double-blind Phase | Week 76 | 154 participants |
| Methotrexate | Number of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response Criteria During the Double-blind Phase | Week 104 | 144 participants |
| Adalimumab | Number of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response Criteria During the Double-blind Phase | Week 104 | 135 participants |
| Adalimumab | Number of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response Criteria During the Double-blind Phase | Week 26 | 146 participants |
| Adalimumab | Number of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response Criteria During the Double-blind Phase | Week 76 | 137 participants |
| Adalimumab | Number of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response Criteria During the Double-blind Phase | Week 52 | 149 participants |
| Adalimumab + Methotrexate | Number of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response Criteria During the Double-blind Phase | Week 104 | 186 participants |
| Adalimumab + Methotrexate | Number of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response Criteria During the Double-blind Phase | Week 52 | 195 participants |
| Adalimumab + Methotrexate | Number of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response Criteria During the Double-blind Phase | Week 76 | 185 participants |
| Adalimumab + Methotrexate | Number of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response Criteria During the Double-blind Phase | Week 26 | 184 participants |
Number of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response Criteria at Week 104
American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) response. A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline were met: * ≥ 50% improvement in tender joint count; * ≥ 50% improvement in swollen joint count; and * ≥ 50% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: * Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale \[VAS\]); * Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); * Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); * Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index \[HAQ-DI\]); * Acute phase reactant value (C-Reactive Protein). Participants withdrawing early were considered non-responders.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 104
Population: Full analysis set. Participants with insufficient data to calculate ACR50 at Week 104 or who withdrew early were considered non-responders.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Methotrexate | Number of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response Criteria at Week 104 | 110 participants |
| Adalimumab | Number of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response Criteria at Week 104 | 101 participants |
| Adalimumab + Methotrexate | Number of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response Criteria at Week 104 | 158 participants |
Number of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response Criteria at Weeks 26 and 76
American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) response. A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline were met: * ≥ 50% improvement in tender joint count; * ≥ 50% improvement in swollen joint count; and * ≥ 50% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: * Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale \[VAS\]); * Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); * Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); * Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index \[HAQ-DI\]); * Acute phase reactant value (C-Reactive Protein). Participants withdrawing early were considered non-responders.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 26 and 76
Population: Full analysis set. Participants with insufficient data to calculate ACR50 or who withdrew early were considered non-responders.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Methotrexate | Number of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response Criteria at Weeks 26 and 76 | Week 26 | 104 participants |
| Methotrexate | Number of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response Criteria at Weeks 26 and 76 | Week 76 | 114 participants |
| Adalimumab | Number of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response Criteria at Weeks 26 and 76 | Week 26 | 96 participants |
| Adalimumab | Number of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response Criteria at Weeks 26 and 76 | Week 76 | 114 participants |
| Adalimumab + Methotrexate | Number of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response Criteria at Weeks 26 and 76 | Week 26 | 157 participants |
| Adalimumab + Methotrexate | Number of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response Criteria at Weeks 26 and 76 | Week 76 | 161 participants |
Number of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response Criteria During the Double-blind Phase
American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) response. A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline were met: * ≥ 70% improvement in tender joint count; * ≥ 70% improvement in swollen joint count; and * ≥ 70% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: * Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale \[VAS\]); * Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); * Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); * Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index \[HAQ-DI\]); * Acute phase reactant value (C-Reactive Protein). Participants withdrawing early were considered non-responders.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 26, 52, 76, and 104
Population: Full analysis set. Participants with insufficient data to calculate ACR70 or who withdrew early were considered non-responders.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Methotrexate | Number of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response Criteria During the Double-blind Phase | Week 26 | 57 participants |
| Methotrexate | Number of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response Criteria During the Double-blind Phase | Week 52 | 70 participants |
| Methotrexate | Number of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response Criteria During the Double-blind Phase | Week 76 | 75 participants |
| Methotrexate | Number of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response Criteria During the Double-blind Phase | Week 104 | 73 participants |
| Adalimumab | Number of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response Criteria During the Double-blind Phase | Week 104 | 77 participants |
| Adalimumab | Number of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response Criteria During the Double-blind Phase | Week 26 | 54 participants |
| Adalimumab | Number of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response Criteria During the Double-blind Phase | Week 76 | 79 participants |
| Adalimumab | Number of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response Criteria During the Double-blind Phase | Week 52 | 71 participants |
| Adalimumab + Methotrexate | Number of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response Criteria During the Double-blind Phase | Week 104 | 125 participants |
| Adalimumab + Methotrexate | Number of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response Criteria During the Double-blind Phase | Week 52 | 122 participants |
| Adalimumab + Methotrexate | Number of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response Criteria During the Double-blind Phase | Week 76 | 127 participants |
| Adalimumab + Methotrexate | Number of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response Criteria During the Double-blind Phase | Week 26 | 114 participants |
Number of Participants Who Achieved Clinical Remission, Defined as a Disease Activity 28 (DAS28) Score < 2.6 at Week 52
The DAS28 is a validated index of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity. Twenty-eight tender joint counts, 28 swollen joint counts, C reactive protein, and general health were included in the DAS28 score. Scores on the DAS28 range from 0 to 10. A DAS28 score \>5.1 indicates high disease activity, a DAS28 score \<3.2 indicates low disease activity, and a DAS28 score \<2.6 indicates clinical remission.
Time frame: Week 52
Population: Full analysis set. Participants with insufficient data to calculate DAS28 at Week 52 or who withdrew early were considered non-responders.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Methotrexate | Number of Participants Who Achieved Clinical Remission, Defined as a Disease Activity 28 (DAS28) Score < 2.6 at Week 52 | 53 participants |
| Adalimumab | Number of Participants Who Achieved Clinical Remission, Defined as a Disease Activity 28 (DAS28) Score < 2.6 at Week 52 | 64 participants |
| Adalimumab + Methotrexate | Number of Participants Who Achieved Clinical Remission, Defined as a Disease Activity 28 (DAS28) Score < 2.6 at Week 52 | 115 participants |
Number of Participants With a Major Clinical Response Over 10 Years by Adalimumab Exposure
A major clinical response was defined as maintenance of an ACR70 response for at least a 6-month continuous period at any time during the study following the first dose of adalimumab. A participant was a responder if the following criteria for improvement from Baseline were met: * ≥ 70% improvement in tender joint count; * ≥ 70% improvement in swollen joint count; and * ≥ 70% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: * Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale \[VAS\]); * Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); * Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); * Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index \[HAQ-DI\]); * Acute phase reactant value (C-Reactive Protein).
Time frame: From the first dose of adalimumab (at Week 1 or Week 106 for patients initially randomized to methotrexate in the DB phase) to Year 10
Population: ITT Analysis Set for participants with non-missing ACR data.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Methotrexate | Number of Participants With a Major Clinical Response Over 10 Years by Adalimumab Exposure | 273 participants |
Number of Participants With DAS28 < 2.6 and < 3.2 Over 10 Years by Adalimumab Exposure
The DAS28 is a composite score of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity derived from the following variables: * 28 tender joint counts, * 28 swollen joint counts, * C-reactive protein, and * Patient's global assessment of disease activity. Scores on the DAS28 range from 0 to 10. A DAS28 score higher than 5.1 indicates high disease activity, a DAS28 score less than 3.2 indicates low disease activity, and a DAS28 score less than 2.6 indicates clinical remission.
Time frame: After 1, 2, 5, and 10 years of adalimumab exposure
Population: ITT Analysis Set, with available data. The Number of Participants Analyzed indicates patients with non-missing DAS28 scores at any post-baseline time point; N indicates patients with non-missing data at each specified time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Methotrexate | Number of Participants With DAS28 < 2.6 and < 3.2 Over 10 Years by Adalimumab Exposure | Year 1 [N=405] | 173 participants |
| Methotrexate | Number of Participants With DAS28 < 2.6 and < 3.2 Over 10 Years by Adalimumab Exposure | Year 2 [N=389] | 215 participants |
| Methotrexate | Number of Participants With DAS28 < 2.6 and < 3.2 Over 10 Years by Adalimumab Exposure | Year 5 [N=333] | 190 participants |
| Methotrexate | Number of Participants With DAS28 < 2.6 and < 3.2 Over 10 Years by Adalimumab Exposure | Year 10 [N=159] | 109 participants |
| Adalimumab | Number of Participants With DAS28 < 2.6 and < 3.2 Over 10 Years by Adalimumab Exposure | Year 10 [N=159] | 135 participants |
| Adalimumab | Number of Participants With DAS28 < 2.6 and < 3.2 Over 10 Years by Adalimumab Exposure | Year 1 [N=405] | 244 participants |
| Adalimumab | Number of Participants With DAS28 < 2.6 and < 3.2 Over 10 Years by Adalimumab Exposure | Year 5 [N=333] | 244 participants |
| Adalimumab | Number of Participants With DAS28 < 2.6 and < 3.2 Over 10 Years by Adalimumab Exposure | Year 2 [N=389] | 271 participants |
Number of Participants With Improvement in HAQ-DI by 0.22 and 0.5 Units Over 10 Years by Adalimumab Exposure
The Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) is a patient-reported questionnaire specific for rheumatoid arthritis. It consists of 20 questions referring to eight domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and daily activities. Participants assessed their ability to do each task over the past week using the following response categories: without any difficulty (0); with some difficulty (1); with much difficulty (2); and unable to do (3). Scores on each task were summed and averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 to 3, where zero represents no disability and three very severe, high-dependency disability. A decrease in the HAQ-DI score represents an improvement in physical function; a clinically significant improvement is defined as a decrease of least 0.22 from Baseline in the HAQ-DI score. The number of participants with improvement in HAQ-DI of at least 0.22 and 0.5 units from Baseline is reported.
Time frame: Baseline and Years 1, 2, 5, and 10. Baseline was the last value prior to the first dose of adalimumab. For patients randomized to the MTX arm in the DB phase, Baseline was the last visit prior to the first adalimumab dose at Week 106.
Population: ITT Analysis Set, with available data. The Number of Participants Analyzed indicates patients with non-missing HAQ-DI scores at any post-baseline time point; N indicates patients with non-missing data at each specified time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Improvement in HAQ-DI by 0.22 and 0.5 Units Over 10 Years by Adalimumab Exposure | Year 1 [N=407] | 353 participants |
| Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Improvement in HAQ-DI by 0.22 and 0.5 Units Over 10 Years by Adalimumab Exposure | Year 2 [N=390] | 324 participants |
| Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Improvement in HAQ-DI by 0.22 and 0.5 Units Over 10 Years by Adalimumab Exposure | Year 5 [N=344] | 239 participants |
| Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Improvement in HAQ-DI by 0.22 and 0.5 Units Over 10 Years by Adalimumab Exposure | Year 10 [N=170] | 140 participants |
| Adalimumab | Number of Participants With Improvement in HAQ-DI by 0.22 and 0.5 Units Over 10 Years by Adalimumab Exposure | Year 10 [N=170] | 112 participants |
| Adalimumab | Number of Participants With Improvement in HAQ-DI by 0.22 and 0.5 Units Over 10 Years by Adalimumab Exposure | Year 1 [N=407] | 285 participants |
| Adalimumab | Number of Participants With Improvement in HAQ-DI by 0.22 and 0.5 Units Over 10 Years by Adalimumab Exposure | Year 5 [N=344] | 188 participants |
| Adalimumab | Number of Participants With Improvement in HAQ-DI by 0.22 and 0.5 Units Over 10 Years by Adalimumab Exposure | Year 2 [N=390] | 265 participants |
Number of Participants With Improvement in the HAQ-DI Score ≥ 0.3 During the Double-blind Treatment Phase
The Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index is a patient-reported questionnaire specific for rheumatoid arthritis. It consists of 20 questions referring to eight domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and daily activities. Participants assessed their ability to do each task over the past week using the following response categories: without any difficulty (0); with some difficulty (1); with much difficulty (2); and unable to do (3). Scores on each task were summed and averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 to 3, where zero represents no disability and three very severe, high-dependency disability.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 26, 52, 76, and 104
Population: Full analysis set. Missing values were considered to be \< 0.3.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Improvement in the HAQ-DI Score ≥ 0.3 During the Double-blind Treatment Phase | Week 26 | 172 participants |
| Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Improvement in the HAQ-DI Score ≥ 0.3 During the Double-blind Treatment Phase | Week 52 | 158 participants |
| Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Improvement in the HAQ-DI Score ≥ 0.3 During the Double-blind Treatment Phase | Week 76 | 144 participants |
| Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Improvement in the HAQ-DI Score ≥ 0.3 During the Double-blind Treatment Phase | Week 104 | 137 participants |
| Adalimumab | Number of Participants With Improvement in the HAQ-DI Score ≥ 0.3 During the Double-blind Treatment Phase | Week 104 | 132 participants |
| Adalimumab | Number of Participants With Improvement in the HAQ-DI Score ≥ 0.3 During the Double-blind Treatment Phase | Week 26 | 169 participants |
| Adalimumab | Number of Participants With Improvement in the HAQ-DI Score ≥ 0.3 During the Double-blind Treatment Phase | Week 76 | 145 participants |
| Adalimumab | Number of Participants With Improvement in the HAQ-DI Score ≥ 0.3 During the Double-blind Treatment Phase | Week 52 | 151 participants |
| Adalimumab + Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Improvement in the HAQ-DI Score ≥ 0.3 During the Double-blind Treatment Phase | Week 104 | 171 participants |
| Adalimumab + Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Improvement in the HAQ-DI Score ≥ 0.3 During the Double-blind Treatment Phase | Week 52 | 186 participants |
| Adalimumab + Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Improvement in the HAQ-DI Score ≥ 0.3 During the Double-blind Treatment Phase | Week 76 | 173 participants |
| Adalimumab + Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Improvement in the HAQ-DI Score ≥ 0.3 During the Double-blind Treatment Phase | Week 26 | 200 participants |
Number of Participants With Major Clinical Response After 104 Weeks of Treatment
Major clinical response was defined as an American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) response for any six continuous months, over 104 weeks of treatment. A participant was a responder if the following criteria for improvement from Baseline were met: * ≥ 70% improvement in tender joint count; * ≥ 70% improvement in swollen joint count; and * ≥ 70% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: * Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale \[VAS\]); * Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); * Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); * Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index \[HAQ-DI\]); * Acute phase reactant value (C-Reactive Protein). Participants withdrawing early were non-responders.
Time frame: Any 6 continuous months from Baseline to Week 104
Population: Full analysis set.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Major Clinical Response After 104 Weeks of Treatment | 70 participants |
| Adalimumab | Number of Participants With Major Clinical Response After 104 Weeks of Treatment | 67 participants |
| Adalimumab + Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Major Clinical Response After 104 Weeks of Treatment | 130 participants |
Number of Participants With No Erosions at Baseline and No New Erosions at Weeks 52 and 104
The number of participants with no erosions at Baseline and no erosions at Weeks 52 and 104, where no erosions and no new erosions are defined as an erosion score = 0. Digitized images of radiographs of hands and feet obtained at screening and during the study were scored in a blinded manner. Joints on each hand/wrist (17 joints) and each forefoot (6 joints) were scored for erosions on a scale of 0 = no erosions; 1 = 1 discrete erosion or ≤20% joint involvement; 2 = 2 separate quadrants with erosion or 21-40% joint involvement; 3 = 3 separate quadrants with erosion or 41-60% joint involvement; 4 = all 4 quadrants with erosion or 61-80% joint involvement; and 5 = extensive destruction with \>80% joint involvement. Scores were summed to calculate the total erosion score, which ranges from 0 (no erosion) to 230 (worst).
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 52 and 104
Population: Full analysis set participants with no erosions at Baseline and non-missing data.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Methotrexate | Number of Participants With No Erosions at Baseline and No New Erosions at Weeks 52 and 104 | Week 52 | 8 participants |
| Methotrexate | Number of Participants With No Erosions at Baseline and No New Erosions at Weeks 52 and 104 | Week 104 | 7 participants |
| Adalimumab | Number of Participants With No Erosions at Baseline and No New Erosions at Weeks 52 and 104 | Week 52 | 10 participants |
| Adalimumab | Number of Participants With No Erosions at Baseline and No New Erosions at Weeks 52 and 104 | Week 104 | 8 participants |
| Adalimumab + Methotrexate | Number of Participants With No Erosions at Baseline and No New Erosions at Weeks 52 and 104 | Week 52 | 13 participants |
| Adalimumab + Methotrexate | Number of Participants With No Erosions at Baseline and No New Erosions at Weeks 52 and 104 | Week 104 | 11 participants |
Number of Participants With Non-Involved Joints at Baseline and No Newly Involved Joints at Weeks 52 and 104
Number of participants with non-involved joints at Baseline and no newly involved joints at Weeks 52 and 104, where involved joints or no newly involved joints are defined as modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) = 0. Digitized images of radiographs of hands and feet obtained at screening and during the study were scored in a blinded manner. Joints were scored for erosions on a scale of 0 (no damage) to 5 (complete collapse) and joint space narrowing on a scale of 0 (no damage) to 4 (ankylosis or complete dislocation). Erosion scores and narrowing scores were added to obtain the mTSS (range = 0 \[normal\] to 398 \[maximal disease\]).
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 52 and 104
Population: Full analysis set participants with non-involved joints at Baseline and non-missing data.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Non-Involved Joints at Baseline and No Newly Involved Joints at Weeks 52 and 104 | Week 52 | 4 participants |
| Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Non-Involved Joints at Baseline and No Newly Involved Joints at Weeks 52 and 104 | Week 104 | 3 participants |
| Adalimumab | Number of Participants With Non-Involved Joints at Baseline and No Newly Involved Joints at Weeks 52 and 104 | Week 52 | 9 participants |
| Adalimumab | Number of Participants With Non-Involved Joints at Baseline and No Newly Involved Joints at Weeks 52 and 104 | Week 104 | 7 participants |
| Adalimumab + Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Non-Involved Joints at Baseline and No Newly Involved Joints at Weeks 52 and 104 | Week 104 | 9 participants |
| Adalimumab + Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Non-Involved Joints at Baseline and No Newly Involved Joints at Weeks 52 and 104 | Week 52 | 12 participants |
Number of Participants With No Radiographic Progression Over 10 Years
The modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) is a measure of change in joint health. Digitized images of radiographs of hands and feet obtained at screening and during the study were scored in a blinded manner. Joints were scored for erosions on a scale of 0 (no damage) to 5 (complete collapse) and joint space narrowing on a scale of 0 (no damage) to 4 (ankylosis or complete dislocation). Erosion scores and narrowing scores were added to obtain the mTSS (range = 0 \[normal\] to 398 \[maximal disease\]). An increase in mTSS from Baseline represents disease progression and/or joint worsening, no change represents halting of disease progression, and a decrease represents improvement. The number of participants with change from Baseline ≤ 0.5 and ≤ 0 is reported as a measure of no disease progression.
Time frame: Baseline (prior to first study drug treatment) and Years 2 and 10.
Population: ITT Analysis Set, with available data. N indicates patients with non-missing radiographic data at each time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Methotrexate | Number of Participants With No Radiographic Progression Over 10 Years | Change ≤ 0.5 at Year 2 [N=83, 92, 89] | 36 participants |
| Methotrexate | Number of Participants With No Radiographic Progression Over 10 Years | Change ≤ 0.5 at Year 10 [N=83, 93, 90] | 26 participants |
| Methotrexate | Number of Participants With No Radiographic Progression Over 10 Years | Change ≤ 0 at Year 2 [N=83, 92, 89] | 22 participants |
| Methotrexate | Number of Participants With No Radiographic Progression Over 10 Years | Change ≤ 0 at Year 10 [N=83, 93, 90] | 19 participants |
| Adalimumab | Number of Participants With No Radiographic Progression Over 10 Years | Change ≤ 0 at Year 10 [N=83, 93, 90] | 16 participants |
| Adalimumab | Number of Participants With No Radiographic Progression Over 10 Years | Change ≤ 0.5 at Year 2 [N=83, 92, 89] | 40 participants |
| Adalimumab | Number of Participants With No Radiographic Progression Over 10 Years | Change ≤ 0 at Year 2 [N=83, 92, 89] | 30 participants |
| Adalimumab | Number of Participants With No Radiographic Progression Over 10 Years | Change ≤ 0.5 at Year 10 [N=83, 93, 90] | 22 participants |
| Adalimumab + Methotrexate | Number of Participants With No Radiographic Progression Over 10 Years | Change ≤ 0 at Year 10 [N=83, 93, 90] | 29 participants |
| Adalimumab + Methotrexate | Number of Participants With No Radiographic Progression Over 10 Years | Change ≤ 0.5 at Year 10 [N=83, 93, 90] | 33 participants |
| Adalimumab + Methotrexate | Number of Participants With No Radiographic Progression Over 10 Years | Change ≤ 0 at Year 2 [N=83, 92, 89] | 51 participants |
| Adalimumab + Methotrexate | Number of Participants With No Radiographic Progression Over 10 Years | Change ≤ 0.5 at Year 2 [N=83, 92, 89] | 65 participants |
Number of Participants With No Worsening in Modified Total Sharp Score or Components During the Double-blind Treatment Phase
The number of participants with no worsening in the modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) and in erosion and joint space narrowing (JSN) scores, where no worsening is defined as a change from Baseline of ≤ 0 in mTSS, erosion score and JSN score, at Weeks 52 and 104. Digitized images of radiographs of hands and feet obtained at screening and during the study were scored in a blinded manner. Joints were scored for erosions on a scale of 0 (no damage) to 5 (complete collapse) and joint space narrowing on a scale of 0 (no damage) to 4 (ankylosis or complete dislocation). Erosion scores and narrowing scores were added to obtain the mTSS (range = 0 \[normal\] to 398 \[maximal disease\]). An increase in mTSS from Baseline represents disease progression and/or joint worsening, no change represents halting of disease progression, and a decrease represents improvement.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 52 and 104
Population: Full analysis set. Participants with missing data or who withdrew early were considered non-responders.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Methotrexate | Number of Participants With No Worsening in Modified Total Sharp Score or Components During the Double-blind Treatment Phase | Modified Total Sharp Score: Week 52 | 78 participants |
| Methotrexate | Number of Participants With No Worsening in Modified Total Sharp Score or Components During the Double-blind Treatment Phase | Modified Total Sharp Score: Week 104 | 70 participants |
| Methotrexate | Number of Participants With No Worsening in Modified Total Sharp Score or Components During the Double-blind Treatment Phase | Erosion Scoe: Week 52 | 91 participants |
| Methotrexate | Number of Participants With No Worsening in Modified Total Sharp Score or Components During the Double-blind Treatment Phase | Erosion Score: Week 104 | 81 participants |
| Methotrexate | Number of Participants With No Worsening in Modified Total Sharp Score or Components During the Double-blind Treatment Phase | Joint Space Narrowing Score: Week 52 | 127 participants |
| Methotrexate | Number of Participants With No Worsening in Modified Total Sharp Score or Components During the Double-blind Treatment Phase | Joint Space Narrowing Score: Week 104 | 112 participants |
| Adalimumab | Number of Participants With No Worsening in Modified Total Sharp Score or Components During the Double-blind Treatment Phase | Joint Space Narrowing Score: Week 104 | 147 participants |
| Adalimumab | Number of Participants With No Worsening in Modified Total Sharp Score or Components During the Double-blind Treatment Phase | Modified Total Sharp Score: Week 52 | 112 participants |
| Adalimumab | Number of Participants With No Worsening in Modified Total Sharp Score or Components During the Double-blind Treatment Phase | Erosion Score: Week 104 | 121 participants |
| Adalimumab | Number of Participants With No Worsening in Modified Total Sharp Score or Components During the Double-blind Treatment Phase | Joint Space Narrowing Score: Week 52 | 159 participants |
| Adalimumab | Number of Participants With No Worsening in Modified Total Sharp Score or Components During the Double-blind Treatment Phase | Modified Total Sharp Score: Week 104 | 105 participants |
| Adalimumab | Number of Participants With No Worsening in Modified Total Sharp Score or Components During the Double-blind Treatment Phase | Erosion Scoe: Week 52 | 133 participants |
| Adalimumab + Methotrexate | Number of Participants With No Worsening in Modified Total Sharp Score or Components During the Double-blind Treatment Phase | Modified Total Sharp Score: Week 104 | 136 participants |
| Adalimumab + Methotrexate | Number of Participants With No Worsening in Modified Total Sharp Score or Components During the Double-blind Treatment Phase | Erosion Scoe: Week 52 | 158 participants |
| Adalimumab + Methotrexate | Number of Participants With No Worsening in Modified Total Sharp Score or Components During the Double-blind Treatment Phase | Joint Space Narrowing Score: Week 104 | 175 participants |
| Adalimumab + Methotrexate | Number of Participants With No Worsening in Modified Total Sharp Score or Components During the Double-blind Treatment Phase | Erosion Score: Week 104 | 148 participants |
| Adalimumab + Methotrexate | Number of Participants With No Worsening in Modified Total Sharp Score or Components During the Double-blind Treatment Phase | Modified Total Sharp Score: Week 52 | 141 participants |
| Adalimumab + Methotrexate | Number of Participants With No Worsening in Modified Total Sharp Score or Components During the Double-blind Treatment Phase | Joint Space Narrowing Score: Week 52 | 190 participants |
Numeric American College of Rheumatology (ACR-N) During the Double-blind Treatment Phase
ACR-N is a composite, continuous variable which measures the percentage of improvement from Baseline in individual participants based on the 7 core set variables of the ACR. ACR-N is defined as the smallest percent change from Baseline of 3 measures: tender joint counts (TJC), swollen joint counts (SJC), and the median percent improvement in the 5 remaining measures (Patient's Assessment of Pain, Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity, Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity, Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index \[HAQ-DI\], and C-Reactive Protein). A positive ACR-N value indicates improvement; a negative ACR-N value indicates worsening; ACR-N of 0 indicates no change.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 26, 52, 76, and 104
Population: Full analysis set with available data.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Methotrexate | Numeric American College of Rheumatology (ACR-N) During the Double-blind Treatment Phase | Week 26 [N=218, 224, 244] | 44.7 percent change | Standard Deviation 42.2 |
| Methotrexate | Numeric American College of Rheumatology (ACR-N) During the Double-blind Treatment Phase | Week 52 [N=194, 193, 220] | 50.2 percent change | Standard Deviation 48.2 |
| Methotrexate | Numeric American College of Rheumatology (ACR-N) During the Double-blind Treatment Phase | Week 76 [N=181, 179, 211] | 56.1 percent change | Standard Deviation 38.1 |
| Methotrexate | Numeric American College of Rheumatology (ACR-N) During the Double-blind Treatment Phase | Week 104 [N=168, 167, 203] | 57.3 percent change | Standard Deviation 37.1 |
| Adalimumab | Numeric American College of Rheumatology (ACR-N) During the Double-blind Treatment Phase | Week 104 [N=168, 167, 203] | 54.0 percent change | Standard Deviation 42.7 |
| Adalimumab | Numeric American College of Rheumatology (ACR-N) During the Double-blind Treatment Phase | Week 26 [N=218, 224, 244] | 39.1 percent change | Standard Deviation 43.3 |
| Adalimumab | Numeric American College of Rheumatology (ACR-N) During the Double-blind Treatment Phase | Week 76 [N=181, 179, 211] | 51.5 percent change | Standard Deviation 56.8 |
| Adalimumab | Numeric American College of Rheumatology (ACR-N) During the Double-blind Treatment Phase | Week 52 [N=194, 193, 220] | 44.4 percent change | Standard Deviation 52.2 |
| Adalimumab + Methotrexate | Numeric American College of Rheumatology (ACR-N) During the Double-blind Treatment Phase | Week 104 [N=168, 167, 203] | 71.4 percent change | Standard Deviation 31 |
| Adalimumab + Methotrexate | Numeric American College of Rheumatology (ACR-N) During the Double-blind Treatment Phase | Week 52 [N=194, 193, 220] | 66.3 percent change | Standard Deviation 34.8 |
| Adalimumab + Methotrexate | Numeric American College of Rheumatology (ACR-N) During the Double-blind Treatment Phase | Week 76 [N=181, 179, 211] | 68.8 percent change | Standard Deviation 31.3 |
| Adalimumab + Methotrexate | Numeric American College of Rheumatology (ACR-N) During the Double-blind Treatment Phase | Week 26 [N=218, 224, 244] | 57.0 percent change | Standard Deviation 42.2 |