Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety of Adalimumab and Methotrexate (MTX) Versus MTX Monotherapy in Subjects With Early Rheumatoid Arthritis

A Prospective Multi-Centre Randomised, Double-Blind, Active Comparator-Controlled, Parallel-Groups Study Comparing the Fully Human Monoclonal Anti-TNFα Antibody Adalimumab Given Every Second Week With Methotrexate Given Weekly and the Combination of Adalimumab and Methotrexate Administered Over 2 Years in Patients With Early Rheumatoid Arthritis (PREMIER).

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00195663
Acronym
PREMIER
Enrollment
799
Registered
2005-09-20
Start date
2000-12-31
Completion date
2012-04-30
Last updated
2013-07-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Early Rheumatoid Arthritis

Keywords

Early Rheumatoid Arthritis

Brief summary

The purpose of the study is to assess the safety and efficacy of adalimumab in combination with methotrexate in patients with recent onset rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and to assess the long-term safety and maintenance of efficacy after treatment with adalimumab for up to 10 years.

Detailed description

This study had an initial 2-year double-blind treatment period followed by an 8-year open-label extension period, for a total of up to 10 years study duration. The study was designed to assess the potential of adalimumab + methotrexate to improve signs and symptoms of disease and to inhibit radiographic progression in patients with recent onset (disease duration less than 3 years) rheumatoid arthritis not previously treated with methotrexate. Adalimumab is a human anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) monoclonal antibody.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALAdalimumab
DRUGMethotrexate

Sponsors

AbbVie (prior sponsor, Abbott)
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subject was age 18 or older and in good health (Investigator discretion) with a recent stable medical history. * Diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) as defined by the 1987-revised American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria, with a disease duration less than 3 years, at least 8 swollen joints out of the 66 joints assessed, at least 10 tender joints out of the 68 joints assessed, at least 1 joint erosion or rheumatoid factor (RF) positivity, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) \>= 28 mm/1h or C-reactive protein (CRP) \>= 1.5 mg/dl

Exclusion criteria

* Chronic arthritis diagnosed before the age of 16 * Preceding treatment with MTX, cyclophosphamide, cyclosporin, azathioprine or more than 2 other disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) * Subject previously received anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) therapy * Permanently wheelchair-bound or bedridden patients * Subject considered by the investigator, for any reason, to be an unsuitable candidate for the study * Female subject who is pregnant or breast-feeding or considering becoming pregnant

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response Criteria at Week 52Baseline and 52 WeeksAmerican College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) response. A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline were met: * ≥ 50% improvement in tender joint count; * ≥ 50% improvement in swollen joint count; and * ≥ 50% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: * Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale \[VAS\]); * Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); * Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); * Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI)); * Acute phase reactant value (C-Reactive Protein). Participants who withdrew early were considered non-responders.
Change From Baseline in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) at Week 52Baseline and Week 52The modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) is a measure of change in joint health. Digitized images of radiographs of hands and feet obtained at screening and Week 52 were scored in a blinded manner. Joints were scored for erosions on a scale from 0 (no damage) to 5 (complete collapse) and joint space narrowing on a scale from 0 (no damage) to 4 (ankylosis or complete dislocation). Erosion scores and narrowing scores were added to obtain the mTSS (range = 0 \[normal\] to 398 \[maximal disease\]). An increase in mTSS from Baseline represents disease progression and/or joint worsening, no change represents halting of disease progression, and a decrease represents improvement.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) at Week 104Baseline and Week 104The modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) is a measure of change in joint health. Digitized images of radiographs of hands and feet obtained at screening and Week 104 were scored in a blinded manner. Joints were scored for erosions on a scale of 0 (no damage) to 5 (complete collapse) and joint space narrowing on a scale of 0 (no damage) to 4 (ankylosis or complete dislocation). Erosion scores and narrowing scores were added to obtain the mTSS (range = 0 \[normal\] to 398 \[maximal disease\]). An increase in mTSS from Baseline represents disease progression and/or joint worsening, no change represents halting of disease progression, and a decrease represents improvement.
Number of Participants Who Achieved Clinical Remission, Defined as a Disease Activity 28 (DAS28) Score < 2.6 at Week 52Week 52The DAS28 is a validated index of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity. Twenty-eight tender joint counts, 28 swollen joint counts, C reactive protein, and general health were included in the DAS28 score. Scores on the DAS28 range from 0 to 10. A DAS28 score \>5.1 indicates high disease activity, a DAS28 score \<3.2 indicates low disease activity, and a DAS28 score \<2.6 indicates clinical remission.
Change From Baseline in the Physical Component of the Short Form-36 Health Status Survey (SF-36) at Week 52Baseline and Week 52The SF-36 determined participants' overall quality of life by assessing 1) limitations in physical functioning due to health problems; 2) limitations in usual role because of physical health problems; 3) bodily pain; 4) general health perceptions; 5) vitality; 6) limitations in social functioning because of physical or emotional problems; 7) limitations in usual role due to emotional problems; and 8) general mental health. Items 1-4 comprise the physical component of the SF-36. Scores on each item were summed and averaged (range = 0-100); increases from Baseline indicate improvement.
Number of Participants With Major Clinical Response After 104 Weeks of TreatmentAny 6 continuous months from Baseline to Week 104Major clinical response was defined as an American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) response for any six continuous months, over 104 weeks of treatment. A participant was a responder if the following criteria for improvement from Baseline were met: * ≥ 70% improvement in tender joint count; * ≥ 70% improvement in swollen joint count; and * ≥ 70% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: * Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale \[VAS\]); * Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); * Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); * Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index \[HAQ-DI\]); * Acute phase reactant value (C-Reactive Protein). Participants withdrawing early were non-responders.
Change From Baseline in the Mental Component of the Short Form-36 Health Status Survey (SF-36) at Week 52Baseline and Week 52The SF-36 determined participants' overall quality of life by assessing 1) limitations in physical functioning due to health problems; 2) limitations in usual role because of physical health problems; 3) bodily pain; 4) general health perceptions; 5) vitality; 6) limitations in social functioning because of physical or emotional problems; 7) limitations in usual role due to emotional problems; and 8) general mental health. Items 5-8 comprise the mental component of the SF-36. Scores on each item were summed and averaged (range = 0-100); increases from Baseline indicate improvement.
Number of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response Criteria at Weeks 26 and 76Baseline and Weeks 26 and 76American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) response. A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline were met: * ≥ 50% improvement in tender joint count; * ≥ 50% improvement in swollen joint count; and * ≥ 50% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: * Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale \[VAS\]); * Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); * Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); * Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index \[HAQ-DI\]); * Acute phase reactant value (C-Reactive Protein). Participants withdrawing early were considered non-responders.
Number of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response Criteria During the Double-blind PhaseBaseline and Weeks 26, 52, 76, and 104American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) response. A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline were met: * ≥ 20% improvement in tender joint count; * ≥ 20% improvement in swollen joint count; and * ≥ 20% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: * Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale \[VAS\]); * Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); * Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); * Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index \[HAQ-DI\]); * Acute phase reactant value (C-Reactive Protein). Participants withdrawing early were considered non-responders.
Number of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response Criteria During the Double-blind PhaseBaseline and Weeks 26, 52, 76, and 104American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) response. A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline were met: * ≥ 70% improvement in tender joint count; * ≥ 70% improvement in swollen joint count; and * ≥ 70% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: * Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale \[VAS\]); * Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); * Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); * Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index \[HAQ-DI\]); * Acute phase reactant value (C-Reactive Protein). Participants withdrawing early were considered non-responders.
Change From Baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) During the Double-blind Treatment PhaseBaseline and Weeks 12, 26, 76, and 104The Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index is a patient-reported questionnaire specific for rheumatoid arthritis. It consists of 20 questions referring to eight domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and daily activities. Participants assessed their ability to do each task over the past week using the following response categories: without any difficulty (0); with some difficulty (1); with much difficulty (2); and unable to do (3). Scores on each task were summed and averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 to 3, where zero represents no disability and three very severe, high-dependency disability. Negative mean changes from Baseline in the overall score indicate improvement.
Number of Participants With Improvement in the HAQ-DI Score ≥ 0.3 During the Double-blind Treatment PhaseBaseline and Weeks 26, 52, 76, and 104The Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index is a patient-reported questionnaire specific for rheumatoid arthritis. It consists of 20 questions referring to eight domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and daily activities. Participants assessed their ability to do each task over the past week using the following response categories: without any difficulty (0); with some difficulty (1); with much difficulty (2); and unable to do (3). Scores on each task were summed and averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 to 3, where zero represents no disability and three very severe, high-dependency disability.
Change From Baseline in Health Utilities Index Mark 2 and Mark 3 (HUI 2/3) During the Double-blind Treatment PhaseBaseline and Weeks 26, 52, and 104The HUI 2/3 is an assessment of various aspects of participants' health and ability to perform various tasks on a day-to-day basis, including reading, seeing, hearing, speaking, general outlook on life, pain/discomfort, ability to walk, use of hands, memory, ability to think/solve, and ability to perform basic activities such as eating, bathing, and dressing. The HUI 2/3 is a combined 15-item questionnaire based on a recall period of the previous 4 weeks. HUI-2 and HUI-3 scores are calculated independently. The HUI-2 score includes 6 attributes: Sensation, Mobility, Emotion, Cognition, Self-Care, and Pain. The HUI-3 score is comprised of 8 attributes: Vision, Hearing, Speech, Ambulation, Dexterity, Emotion, Cognition, and Pain. The range of each score is from 0 (dead) to 1 (perfect health). An increase from Baseline indicates improvement.
Change From Baseline in the Short Form-36 Health Status Survey (SF-36) During the Double-blind Treatment PhaseBaseline and Weeks 26 and 104The SF-36 determined participants' overall quality of life by assessing 1) limitations in physical functioning due to health problems; 2) limitations in usual role because of physical health problems; 3) bodily pain; 4) general health perceptions; 5) vitality; 6) limitations in social functioning because of physical or emotional problems; 7) limitations in usual role due to emotional problems; and 8) general mental health. Items 1-4 comprise the physical component and items 5-8 comprise the mental component of the SF-36. Scores on each item were summed and averaged (range = 0-100); increases from Baseline indicate improvement.
Numeric American College of Rheumatology (ACR-N) During the Double-blind Treatment PhaseBaseline and Weeks 26, 52, 76, and 104ACR-N is a composite, continuous variable which measures the percentage of improvement from Baseline in individual participants based on the 7 core set variables of the ACR. ACR-N is defined as the smallest percent change from Baseline of 3 measures: tender joint counts (TJC), swollen joint counts (SJC), and the median percent improvement in the 5 remaining measures (Patient's Assessment of Pain, Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity, Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity, Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index \[HAQ-DI\], and C-Reactive Protein). A positive ACR-N value indicates improvement; a negative ACR-N value indicates worsening; ACR-N of 0 indicates no change.
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score (DAS28) During the Double-blind Treatment PhaseBaseline and Weeks 26, 52, 76, and 104The DAS28 is a composite score of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity derived from the following variables: * 28 tender joint counts, * 28 swollen joint counts, * C-reactive protein, and * Patient's global assessment of disease activity. Scores on the DAS28 range from 0 to 10. A DAS28 score higher than 5.1 indicates high disease activity, a DAS28 score less than 3.2 indicates low disease activity, and a DAS28 score less than 2.6 indicates clinical remission.
Change From Baseline in Joint Erosion Score During the Double-blind Treatment PeriodBaseline and Weeks 52 and 104Digitized images of radiographs of hands and feet obtained at screening and during the study were scored in a blinded manner. Joints on each hand/wrist (17 joints) and each forefoot (6 joints) were scored for erosions on a scale of 0 = no erosions; 1 = 1 discrete erosion or ≤20% joint involvement; 2 = 2 separate quadrants with erosion or 21-40% joint involvement; 3 = 3 separate quadrants with erosion or 41-60% joint involvement; 4 = all 4 quadrants with erosion or 61-80% joint involvement; and 5 = extensive destruction with \>80% joint involvement. Scores were summed to calculate the total erosion score, which ranges from 0 (no erosion)to 230 (worst). A large increase in erosion score is indicative of worsening, whereas a small change or no change is indicative of inhibition of joint erosion.
Change From Baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 52Baseline and Week 52The Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index is a patient-reported questionnaire specific for rheumatoid arthritis. It consists of 20 questions referring to eight domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and daily activities. Participants assessed their ability to do each task over the past week using the following response categories: without any difficulty (0); with some difficulty (1); with much difficulty (2); and unable to do (3). Scores on each task were summed and averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 to 3, where zero represents no disability and three very severe, high-dependency disability. Negative mean changes from Baseline in the overall score indicate improvement.
Number of Participants With No Worsening in Modified Total Sharp Score or Components During the Double-blind Treatment PhaseBaseline and Weeks 52 and 104The number of participants with no worsening in the modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) and in erosion and joint space narrowing (JSN) scores, where no worsening is defined as a change from Baseline of ≤ 0 in mTSS, erosion score and JSN score, at Weeks 52 and 104. Digitized images of radiographs of hands and feet obtained at screening and during the study were scored in a blinded manner. Joints were scored for erosions on a scale of 0 (no damage) to 5 (complete collapse) and joint space narrowing on a scale of 0 (no damage) to 4 (ankylosis or complete dislocation). Erosion scores and narrowing scores were added to obtain the mTSS (range = 0 \[normal\] to 398 \[maximal disease\]). An increase in mTSS from Baseline represents disease progression and/or joint worsening, no change represents halting of disease progression, and a decrease represents improvement.
Number of Participants With No Erosions at Baseline and No New Erosions at Weeks 52 and 104Baseline and Weeks 52 and 104The number of participants with no erosions at Baseline and no erosions at Weeks 52 and 104, where no erosions and no new erosions are defined as an erosion score = 0. Digitized images of radiographs of hands and feet obtained at screening and during the study were scored in a blinded manner. Joints on each hand/wrist (17 joints) and each forefoot (6 joints) were scored for erosions on a scale of 0 = no erosions; 1 = 1 discrete erosion or ≤20% joint involvement; 2 = 2 separate quadrants with erosion or 21-40% joint involvement; 3 = 3 separate quadrants with erosion or 41-60% joint involvement; 4 = all 4 quadrants with erosion or 61-80% joint involvement; and 5 = extensive destruction with \>80% joint involvement. Scores were summed to calculate the total erosion score, which ranges from 0 (no erosion) to 230 (worst).
Number of Participants With Non-Involved Joints at Baseline and No Newly Involved Joints at Weeks 52 and 104Baseline and Weeks 52 and 104Number of participants with non-involved joints at Baseline and no newly involved joints at Weeks 52 and 104, where involved joints or no newly involved joints are defined as modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) = 0. Digitized images of radiographs of hands and feet obtained at screening and during the study were scored in a blinded manner. Joints were scored for erosions on a scale of 0 (no damage) to 5 (complete collapse) and joint space narrowing on a scale of 0 (no damage) to 4 (ankylosis or complete dislocation). Erosion scores and narrowing scores were added to obtain the mTSS (range = 0 \[normal\] to 398 \[maximal disease\]).
Number of Participants Meeting ACR20 Response Criteria Over 10 Years by Adalimumab ExposureBaseline and after 1, 2, 5, and 10 years of adalimumab exposure. Baseline was the last value prior to the first dose of adalimumab.American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) response. A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline were met: * ≥ 20% improvement in tender joint count; * ≥ 20% improvement in swollen joint count; and * ≥ 20% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: * Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale \[VAS\]); * Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); * Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); * Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index \[HAQ-DI\]); * Acute phase reactant value (C-Reactive Protein). Baseline is the last value prior to the first dose of adalimumab. For participants randomized to the methotrexate (MTX) arm in the double-blind (DB) phase, Baseline was the last visit prior to the first adalimumab dose at Week 106 of the open-label (OL) phase.
Number of Participants Meeting ACR50 Response Criteria Over 10 Years by Adalimumab ExposureBaseline and after 1, 2, 5, and 10 years of adalimumab exposure. Baseline was the last value prior to the first dose of adalimumab.American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) response. A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline were met: * ≥ 50% improvement in tender joint count; * ≥ 50% improvement in swollen joint count; and * ≥ 50% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: * Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale \[VAS\]); * Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); * Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); * Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index \[HAQ-DI\]); * Acute phase reactant value (C-Reactive Protein). Baseline is the last value prior to the first dose of adalimumab. For patients randomized to the methotrexate (MTX) arm in the double-blind (DB) phase, Baseline was the last visit prior to the first adalimumab dose at Week 106 of the open-label (OL) phase.
Number of Participants Meeting ACR70 Response Criteria Over 10 Years by Adalimumab ExposureBaseline and after 1, 2, 5, and 10 years of adalimumab exposure. Baseline was the last value prior to the first dose of adalimumab.American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) response. A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline were met: * ≥ 70% improvement in tender joint count; * ≥ 70% improvement in swollen joint count; and * ≥ 70% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: * Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale \[VAS\]); * Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); * Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); * Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index \[HAQ-DI\]); * Acute phase reactant value (C-Reactive Protein). Baseline is the last value prior to the first dose of adalimumab. For patients randomized to the methotrexate (MTX) arm in the double-blind (DB) phase, Baseline was the last visit prior to the first adalimumab dose at Week 106 of the open-label (OL) phase.
Change From Baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Over 10 Years by Adalimumab ExposureBaseline and Years 1, 2, 5, and 10. Baseline was the last value prior to the first dose of adalimumab. For patients randomized to the MTX arm in the DB phase, Baseline was the last visit prior to the first adalimumab dose at Week 106.The Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index is a patient-reported questionnaire specific for rheumatoid arthritis. It consists of 20 questions referring to eight domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and daily activities. Participants assessed their ability to do each task over the past week using the following response categories: without any difficulty (0); with some difficulty (1); with much difficulty (2); and unable to do (3). Scores on each task were summed and averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 to 3, where zero represents no disability and three very severe, high-dependency disability. Negative mean changes from Baseline in the overall score indicate improvement.
Change From Baseline in DAS28 Over 10 Years by Adalimumab ExposureBaseline and Years 1, 2, 5, and 10. Baseline was the last value prior to the first dose of adalimumab. For patients randomized to the MTX arm in the DB phase, Baseline was the last visit prior to the first adalimumab dose at Week 106.The DAS28 is a composite score of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity derived from the following variables: * 28 tender joint counts, * 28 swollen joint counts, * C-reactive protein, and * Patient's global assessment of disease activity. Scores on the DAS28 range from 0 to 10. A DAS28 score higher than 5.1 indicates high disease activity, a DAS28 score less than 3.2 indicates low disease activity, and a DAS28 score less than 2.6 indicates clinical remission.
Number of Participants With DAS28 < 2.6 and < 3.2 Over 10 Years by Adalimumab ExposureAfter 1, 2, 5, and 10 years of adalimumab exposureThe DAS28 is a composite score of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity derived from the following variables: * 28 tender joint counts, * 28 swollen joint counts, * C-reactive protein, and * Patient's global assessment of disease activity. Scores on the DAS28 range from 0 to 10. A DAS28 score higher than 5.1 indicates high disease activity, a DAS28 score less than 3.2 indicates low disease activity, and a DAS28 score less than 2.6 indicates clinical remission.
Change From Baseline in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) Over 10 YearsBaseline (prior to first study drug treatment) and Years 2 and 10The modified TSS (mTSS) is a measure of change in joint health. Digitized images of radiographs of hands and feet obtained at screening and during the study were scored in a blinded manner. Joints were scored for erosions on a scale of 0 (no damage) to 5 (complete collapse) and joint space narrowing on a scale of 0 (no damage) to 4 (ankylosis or complete dislocation). Erosion scores and narrowing scores were added to obtain the mTSS (range = 0 \[normal\] to 398 \[maximal disease\]). An increase in mTSS from Baseline represents disease progression and/or joint worsening, no change represents halting of disease progression, and a decrease represents improvement.
Number of Participants With No Radiographic Progression Over 10 YearsBaseline (prior to first study drug treatment) and Years 2 and 10.The modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) is a measure of change in joint health. Digitized images of radiographs of hands and feet obtained at screening and during the study were scored in a blinded manner. Joints were scored for erosions on a scale of 0 (no damage) to 5 (complete collapse) and joint space narrowing on a scale of 0 (no damage) to 4 (ankylosis or complete dislocation). Erosion scores and narrowing scores were added to obtain the mTSS (range = 0 \[normal\] to 398 \[maximal disease\]). An increase in mTSS from Baseline represents disease progression and/or joint worsening, no change represents halting of disease progression, and a decrease represents improvement. The number of participants with change from Baseline ≤ 0.5 and ≤ 0 is reported as a measure of no disease progression.
Composite Score of ACR50 Plus No Change in Modified Total Sharp ScoreYear 10
Number of Participants With a Major Clinical Response Over 10 Years by Adalimumab ExposureFrom the first dose of adalimumab (at Week 1 or Week 106 for patients initially randomized to methotrexate in the DB phase) to Year 10A major clinical response was defined as maintenance of an ACR70 response for at least a 6-month continuous period at any time during the study following the first dose of adalimumab. A participant was a responder if the following criteria for improvement from Baseline were met: * ≥ 70% improvement in tender joint count; * ≥ 70% improvement in swollen joint count; and * ≥ 70% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: * Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale \[VAS\]); * Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); * Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); * Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index \[HAQ-DI\]); * Acute phase reactant value (C-Reactive Protein).
Number of Participants With Improvement in HAQ-DI by 0.22 and 0.5 Units Over 10 Years by Adalimumab ExposureBaseline and Years 1, 2, 5, and 10. Baseline was the last value prior to the first dose of adalimumab. For patients randomized to the MTX arm in the DB phase, Baseline was the last visit prior to the first adalimumab dose at Week 106.The Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) is a patient-reported questionnaire specific for rheumatoid arthritis. It consists of 20 questions referring to eight domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and daily activities. Participants assessed their ability to do each task over the past week using the following response categories: without any difficulty (0); with some difficulty (1); with much difficulty (2); and unable to do (3). Scores on each task were summed and averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 to 3, where zero represents no disability and three very severe, high-dependency disability. A decrease in the HAQ-DI score represents an improvement in physical function; a clinically significant improvement is defined as a decrease of least 0.22 from Baseline in the HAQ-DI score. The number of participants with improvement in HAQ-DI of at least 0.22 and 0.5 units from Baseline is reported.
Change From Baseline in Joint Space Narrowing Score During the Double-blind Treatment PeriodBaseline and Weeks 52 and 104Digitized images of radiographs of hands and feet obtained at screening and during the study were scored in a blinded manner. Joint space narrowing (JSN) scores were recorded for each hand/wrist (16 joints) and each forefoot (5 joints) on a 5-point scale (0 = no narrowing; 1 = up to 25% narrowing; 2 = 26-65% narrowing; 3 = 66-99% narrowing; and 4 = complete narrowing). Scores were summed to calculate the total score ranging from 0 (no narrowing) to 168 (maximum narrowing). A large increase in joint narrowing score is indicative of worsening, whereas a small change or no change is indicative of inhibition of JSN.
Number of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response Criteria at Week 104Baseline and Week 104American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) response. A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline were met: * ≥ 50% improvement in tender joint count; * ≥ 50% improvement in swollen joint count; and * ≥ 50% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: * Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale \[VAS\]); * Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); * Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); * Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index \[HAQ-DI\]); * Acute phase reactant value (C-Reactive Protein). Participants withdrawing early were considered non-responders.

Countries

Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Czechia, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Netherlands, Norway, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Patients were enrolled at 94 sites in 15 countries between January 2001 and April 2004.

Pre-assignment details

Patients who had been receiving a previous disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) participated in a 4-week washout period during which the DMARD was withdrawn. Otherwise, there was a one-week washout period after the Screening visit.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Methotrexate
Participants received placebo to adalimumab subcutaneous injection once every other week and methotrexate orally once a week at a starting dose of 7.5 mg/week (could be escalated up to 20 mg/week) during the 2-year double-blind treatment phase. Participants received adalimumab 40 mg every other week for up to 8 years in the open-label extension phase.
257
Adalimumab
Participants received adalimumab 40 mg subcutaneous injection once every other week and placebo to methotrexate orally once a week during the 2-year double-blind treatment phase and then adalimumab 40 mg every other week for up to 8 years in the open-label extension.
274
Adalimumab + Methotrexate
Participants received adalimumab 40 mg subcutaneous injection once every other week and methotrexate orally once a week at a starting dose of 7.5 mg/week (could be escalated up to 20 mg/week) during the 2-year double-blind treatment phase. Participants received adalimumab 40 mg every other week for up to 8 years in the open-label extension phase.
268
Total799

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
2-year Double-blind Treatment PeriodAdministrative reasons329
2-year Double-blind Treatment PeriodAdverse Event212732
2-year Double-blind Treatment PeriodDeath020
2-year Double-blind Treatment PeriodLack of Efficacy475213
2-year Double-blind Treatment PeriodLost to Follow-up001
2-year Double-blind Treatment PeriodPlanned selection criteria010
2-year Double-blind Treatment PeriodProtocol Violation664
2-year Double-blind Treatment PeriodRecovery101
2-year Double-blind Treatment PeriodWithdrawal by Subject151812
Open-Label Extension PeriodAdministrative reasons111113
Open-Label Extension PeriodAdverse Event213236
Open-Label Extension PeriodDeath222
Open-Label Extension PeriodLack of Efficacy14612
Open-Label Extension PeriodLost to Follow-up926
Open-Label Extension PeriodProtocol Violation344
Open-Label Extension PeriodRecovery022
Open-Label Extension PeriodWithdrawal by Subject161522

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicMethotrexateAdalimumabAdalimumab + MethotrexateTotal
Age Continuous52.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.1
52.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.5
51.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14
52.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.5
Sex: Female, Male
Female
190 Participants212 Participants193 Participants595 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
67 Participants62 Participants75 Participants204 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
227 / 257227 / 274241 / 268634 / 697
serious
Total, serious adverse events
47 / 25765 / 27456 / 268320 / 697

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) at Week 52

The modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) is a measure of change in joint health. Digitized images of radiographs of hands and feet obtained at screening and Week 52 were scored in a blinded manner. Joints were scored for erosions on a scale from 0 (no damage) to 5 (complete collapse) and joint space narrowing on a scale from 0 (no damage) to 4 (ankylosis or complete dislocation). Erosion scores and narrowing scores were added to obtain the mTSS (range = 0 \[normal\] to 398 \[maximal disease\]). An increase in mTSS from Baseline represents disease progression and/or joint worsening, no change represents halting of disease progression, and a decrease represents improvement.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 52

Population: Full analysis set. For participants with missing data, mTSS was imputed by linear extrapolation.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MethotrexateChange From Baseline in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) at Week 525.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.7
AdalimumabChange From Baseline in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) at Week 523.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.2
Adalimumab + MethotrexateChange From Baseline in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) at Week 521.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.5
Comparison: Statistical tests were performed in a hierarchical manner. If there was a statistically significant difference in favor of adalimumab + MTX combination treatment on the ACR50 response, the second primary analysis of modified TSS would be performed.p-value: <0.001Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Primary

Number of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response Criteria at Week 52

American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) response. A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline were met: * ≥ 50% improvement in tender joint count; * ≥ 50% improvement in swollen joint count; and * ≥ 50% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: * Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale \[VAS\]); * Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); * Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); * Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI)); * Acute phase reactant value (C-Reactive Protein). Participants who withdrew early were considered non-responders.

Time frame: Baseline and 52 Weeks

Population: The Full Analysis Set consisted of all patients who were randomized and who received at least one dose of double-blinded study medication. Participants with insufficient data to calculate ACR50 at Week 52 or who withdrew early were considered non-responders.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
MethotrexateNumber of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response Criteria at Week 52118 participants
AdalimumabNumber of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response Criteria at Week 52113 participants
Adalimumab + MethotrexateNumber of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response Criteria at Week 52165 participants
Comparison: The study was powered to demonstrate the superiority of adalimumab + MTX combination therapy vs. MTX monotherapy in the proportion of subjects who achieved an ACR50 response at 52 weeks. Power calculations were based on 250 subjects in each group using a chi-squared test with a continuity correction and an alpha = 0.05 significance level. With 250 subjects in each group, a difference of 0.13 in response rates could be detected with 80% power.p-value: <0.001Chi-squared, Corrected
Secondary

Change From Baseline in DAS28 Over 10 Years by Adalimumab Exposure

The DAS28 is a composite score of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity derived from the following variables: * 28 tender joint counts, * 28 swollen joint counts, * C-reactive protein, and * Patient's global assessment of disease activity. Scores on the DAS28 range from 0 to 10. A DAS28 score higher than 5.1 indicates high disease activity, a DAS28 score less than 3.2 indicates low disease activity, and a DAS28 score less than 2.6 indicates clinical remission.

Time frame: Baseline and Years 1, 2, 5, and 10. Baseline was the last value prior to the first dose of adalimumab. For patients randomized to the MTX arm in the DB phase, Baseline was the last visit prior to the first adalimumab dose at Week 106.

Population: ITT Analysis Set, with available data. N indicates patients with non-missing data at Baseline and the specified time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MethotrexateChange From Baseline in DAS28 Over 10 Years by Adalimumab ExposureYear 1 [N=403]-3.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.49
MethotrexateChange From Baseline in DAS28 Over 10 Years by Adalimumab ExposureYear 2 [N=386]-3.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.61
MethotrexateChange From Baseline in DAS28 Over 10 Years by Adalimumab ExposureYear 5 [N=330]-2.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.93
MethotrexateChange From Baseline in DAS28 Over 10 Years by Adalimumab ExposureYear 10 [N=158]-3.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.29
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score (DAS28) During the Double-blind Treatment Phase

The DAS28 is a composite score of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity derived from the following variables: * 28 tender joint counts, * 28 swollen joint counts, * C-reactive protein, and * Patient's global assessment of disease activity. Scores on the DAS28 range from 0 to 10. A DAS28 score higher than 5.1 indicates high disease activity, a DAS28 score less than 3.2 indicates low disease activity, and a DAS28 score less than 2.6 indicates clinical remission.

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 26, 52, 76, and 104

Population: Full analysis set with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MethotrexateChange From Baseline in Disease Activity Score (DAS28) During the Double-blind Treatment PhaseWeek 26 [N=209, 218, 229]-2.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.3
MethotrexateChange From Baseline in Disease Activity Score (DAS28) During the Double-blind Treatment PhaseWeek 52 [N=184, 185, 206]-2.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.4
MethotrexateChange From Baseline in Disease Activity Score (DAS28) During the Double-blind Treatment PhaseWeek 76 [N=173, 173, 197]-3.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.2
MethotrexateChange From Baseline in Disease Activity Score (DAS28) During the Double-blind Treatment PhaseWeek 104 [N=161, 158, 191]-3.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.4
AdalimumabChange From Baseline in Disease Activity Score (DAS28) During the Double-blind Treatment PhaseWeek 104 [N=161, 158, 191]-3.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.4
AdalimumabChange From Baseline in Disease Activity Score (DAS28) During the Double-blind Treatment PhaseWeek 26 [N=209, 218, 229]-2.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.4
AdalimumabChange From Baseline in Disease Activity Score (DAS28) During the Double-blind Treatment PhaseWeek 76 [N=173, 173, 197]-3.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.5
AdalimumabChange From Baseline in Disease Activity Score (DAS28) During the Double-blind Treatment PhaseWeek 52 [N=184, 185, 206]-2.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.5
Adalimumab + MethotrexateChange From Baseline in Disease Activity Score (DAS28) During the Double-blind Treatment PhaseWeek 104 [N=161, 158, 191]-3.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.3
Adalimumab + MethotrexateChange From Baseline in Disease Activity Score (DAS28) During the Double-blind Treatment PhaseWeek 52 [N=184, 185, 206]-3.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.3
Adalimumab + MethotrexateChange From Baseline in Disease Activity Score (DAS28) During the Double-blind Treatment PhaseWeek 76 [N=173, 173, 197]-3.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.3
Adalimumab + MethotrexateChange From Baseline in Disease Activity Score (DAS28) During the Double-blind Treatment PhaseWeek 26 [N=209, 218, 229]-3.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.3
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Health Utilities Index Mark 2 and Mark 3 (HUI 2/3) During the Double-blind Treatment Phase

The HUI 2/3 is an assessment of various aspects of participants' health and ability to perform various tasks on a day-to-day basis, including reading, seeing, hearing, speaking, general outlook on life, pain/discomfort, ability to walk, use of hands, memory, ability to think/solve, and ability to perform basic activities such as eating, bathing, and dressing. The HUI 2/3 is a combined 15-item questionnaire based on a recall period of the previous 4 weeks. HUI-2 and HUI-3 scores are calculated independently. The HUI-2 score includes 6 attributes: Sensation, Mobility, Emotion, Cognition, Self-Care, and Pain. The HUI-3 score is comprised of 8 attributes: Vision, Hearing, Speech, Ambulation, Dexterity, Emotion, Cognition, and Pain. The range of each score is from 0 (dead) to 1 (perfect health). An increase from Baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 26, 52, and 104

Population: Full analysis set with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MethotrexateChange From Baseline in Health Utilities Index Mark 2 and Mark 3 (HUI 2/3) During the Double-blind Treatment PhaseHUI-2: Week 26 [N=192, 187, 205]0.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.2
MethotrexateChange From Baseline in Health Utilities Index Mark 2 and Mark 3 (HUI 2/3) During the Double-blind Treatment PhaseHUI-2: Week 52 [N=179, 162, 189]0.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.2
MethotrexateChange From Baseline in Health Utilities Index Mark 2 and Mark 3 (HUI 2/3) During the Double-blind Treatment PhaseHUI-2: Week 104 [N=152, 136, 174]0.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.2
MethotrexateChange From Baseline in Health Utilities Index Mark 2 and Mark 3 (HUI 2/3) During the Double-blind Treatment PhaseHUI-3: Week 26 [N=192, 189, 205]0.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.3
MethotrexateChange From Baseline in Health Utilities Index Mark 2 and Mark 3 (HUI 2/3) During the Double-blind Treatment PhaseHUI-3: Week 52 [N=177, 164, 190]0.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.3
MethotrexateChange From Baseline in Health Utilities Index Mark 2 and Mark 3 (HUI 2/3) During the Double-blind Treatment PhaseHUI-3: Week 104 [N=154, 138, 177]0.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.2
AdalimumabChange From Baseline in Health Utilities Index Mark 2 and Mark 3 (HUI 2/3) During the Double-blind Treatment PhaseHUI-3: Week 104 [N=154, 138, 177]0.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.3
AdalimumabChange From Baseline in Health Utilities Index Mark 2 and Mark 3 (HUI 2/3) During the Double-blind Treatment PhaseHUI-2: Week 26 [N=192, 187, 205]0.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.2
AdalimumabChange From Baseline in Health Utilities Index Mark 2 and Mark 3 (HUI 2/3) During the Double-blind Treatment PhaseHUI-3: Week 26 [N=192, 189, 205]0.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.3
AdalimumabChange From Baseline in Health Utilities Index Mark 2 and Mark 3 (HUI 2/3) During the Double-blind Treatment PhaseHUI-3: Week 52 [N=177, 164, 190]0.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.3
AdalimumabChange From Baseline in Health Utilities Index Mark 2 and Mark 3 (HUI 2/3) During the Double-blind Treatment PhaseHUI-2: Week 52 [N=179, 162, 189]0.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.2
AdalimumabChange From Baseline in Health Utilities Index Mark 2 and Mark 3 (HUI 2/3) During the Double-blind Treatment PhaseHUI-2: Week 104 [N=152, 136, 174]0.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.2
Adalimumab + MethotrexateChange From Baseline in Health Utilities Index Mark 2 and Mark 3 (HUI 2/3) During the Double-blind Treatment PhaseHUI-2: Week 52 [N=179, 162, 189]0.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.2
Adalimumab + MethotrexateChange From Baseline in Health Utilities Index Mark 2 and Mark 3 (HUI 2/3) During the Double-blind Treatment PhaseHUI-2: Week 104 [N=152, 136, 174]0.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.2
Adalimumab + MethotrexateChange From Baseline in Health Utilities Index Mark 2 and Mark 3 (HUI 2/3) During the Double-blind Treatment PhaseHUI-3: Week 104 [N=154, 138, 177]0.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.3
Adalimumab + MethotrexateChange From Baseline in Health Utilities Index Mark 2 and Mark 3 (HUI 2/3) During the Double-blind Treatment PhaseHUI-3: Week 26 [N=192, 189, 205]0.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.3
Adalimumab + MethotrexateChange From Baseline in Health Utilities Index Mark 2 and Mark 3 (HUI 2/3) During the Double-blind Treatment PhaseHUI-2: Week 26 [N=192, 187, 205]0.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.2
Adalimumab + MethotrexateChange From Baseline in Health Utilities Index Mark 2 and Mark 3 (HUI 2/3) During the Double-blind Treatment PhaseHUI-3: Week 52 [N=177, 164, 190]0.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.3
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Joint Erosion Score During the Double-blind Treatment Period

Digitized images of radiographs of hands and feet obtained at screening and during the study were scored in a blinded manner. Joints on each hand/wrist (17 joints) and each forefoot (6 joints) were scored for erosions on a scale of 0 = no erosions; 1 = 1 discrete erosion or ≤20% joint involvement; 2 = 2 separate quadrants with erosion or 21-40% joint involvement; 3 = 3 separate quadrants with erosion or 41-60% joint involvement; 4 = all 4 quadrants with erosion or 61-80% joint involvement; and 5 = extensive destruction with \>80% joint involvement. Scores were summed to calculate the total erosion score, which ranges from 0 (no erosion)to 230 (worst). A large increase in erosion score is indicative of worsening, whereas a small change or no change is indicative of inhibition of joint erosion.

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 52 and 104

Population: Full analysis set. Missing values were imputed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MethotrexateChange From Baseline in Joint Erosion Score During the Double-blind Treatment PeriodWeek 523.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.4
MethotrexateChange From Baseline in Joint Erosion Score During the Double-blind Treatment PeriodWeek 1046.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.3
AdalimumabChange From Baseline in Joint Erosion Score During the Double-blind Treatment PeriodWeek 521.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.7
AdalimumabChange From Baseline in Joint Erosion Score During the Double-blind Treatment PeriodWeek 1043.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.3
Adalimumab + MethotrexateChange From Baseline in Joint Erosion Score During the Double-blind Treatment PeriodWeek 520.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.3
Adalimumab + MethotrexateChange From Baseline in Joint Erosion Score During the Double-blind Treatment PeriodWeek 1041.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.7
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Joint Space Narrowing Score During the Double-blind Treatment Period

Digitized images of radiographs of hands and feet obtained at screening and during the study were scored in a blinded manner. Joint space narrowing (JSN) scores were recorded for each hand/wrist (16 joints) and each forefoot (5 joints) on a 5-point scale (0 = no narrowing; 1 = up to 25% narrowing; 2 = 26-65% narrowing; 3 = 66-99% narrowing; and 4 = complete narrowing). Scores were summed to calculate the total score ranging from 0 (no narrowing) to 168 (maximum narrowing). A large increase in joint narrowing score is indicative of worsening, whereas a small change or no change is indicative of inhibition of JSN.

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 52 and 104

Population: Full analysis set. Missing values were imputed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MethotrexateChange From Baseline in Joint Space Narrowing Score During the Double-blind Treatment PeriodWeek 522.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.3
MethotrexateChange From Baseline in Joint Space Narrowing Score During the Double-blind Treatment PeriodWeek 1044.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.9
AdalimumabChange From Baseline in Joint Space Narrowing Score During the Double-blind Treatment PeriodWeek 521.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.6
AdalimumabChange From Baseline in Joint Space Narrowing Score During the Double-blind Treatment PeriodWeek 1042.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.5
Adalimumab + MethotrexateChange From Baseline in Joint Space Narrowing Score During the Double-blind Treatment PeriodWeek 520.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.2
Adalimumab + MethotrexateChange From Baseline in Joint Space Narrowing Score During the Double-blind Treatment PeriodWeek 1040.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.1
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) at Week 104

The modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) is a measure of change in joint health. Digitized images of radiographs of hands and feet obtained at screening and Week 104 were scored in a blinded manner. Joints were scored for erosions on a scale of 0 (no damage) to 5 (complete collapse) and joint space narrowing on a scale of 0 (no damage) to 4 (ankylosis or complete dislocation). Erosion scores and narrowing scores were added to obtain the mTSS (range = 0 \[normal\] to 398 \[maximal disease\]). An increase in mTSS from Baseline represents disease progression and/or joint worsening, no change represents halting of disease progression, and a decrease represents improvement.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 104

Population: Full analysis set. For participants with missing data, mTSS was imputed by linear extrapolation.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MethotrexateChange From Baseline in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) at Week 10410.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.7
AdalimumabChange From Baseline in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) at Week 1045.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.8
Adalimumab + MethotrexateChange From Baseline in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) at Week 1041.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.3
p-value: <0.001Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) Over 10 Years

The modified TSS (mTSS) is a measure of change in joint health. Digitized images of radiographs of hands and feet obtained at screening and during the study were scored in a blinded manner. Joints were scored for erosions on a scale of 0 (no damage) to 5 (complete collapse) and joint space narrowing on a scale of 0 (no damage) to 4 (ankylosis or complete dislocation). Erosion scores and narrowing scores were added to obtain the mTSS (range = 0 \[normal\] to 398 \[maximal disease\]). An increase in mTSS from Baseline represents disease progression and/or joint worsening, no change represents halting of disease progression, and a decrease represents improvement.

Time frame: Baseline (prior to first study drug treatment) and Years 2 and 10

Population: ITT Analysis Set, with available data. N indicates patients with non-missing radiographic data at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MethotrexateChange From Baseline in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) Over 10 YearsYear 2 [N=83, 92, 89]6.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.44
MethotrexateChange From Baseline in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) Over 10 YearsYear 10 [N= 83, 93, 90]10.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.01
AdalimumabChange From Baseline in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) Over 10 YearsYear 10 [N= 83, 93, 90]9.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.21
AdalimumabChange From Baseline in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) Over 10 YearsYear 2 [N=83, 92, 89]5.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.63
Adalimumab + MethotrexateChange From Baseline in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) Over 10 YearsYear 2 [N=83, 92, 89]0.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3
Adalimumab + MethotrexateChange From Baseline in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) Over 10 YearsYear 10 [N= 83, 93, 90]3.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.64
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 52

The Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index is a patient-reported questionnaire specific for rheumatoid arthritis. It consists of 20 questions referring to eight domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and daily activities. Participants assessed their ability to do each task over the past week using the following response categories: without any difficulty (0); with some difficulty (1); with much difficulty (2); and unable to do (3). Scores on each task were summed and averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 to 3, where zero represents no disability and three very severe, high-dependency disability. Negative mean changes from Baseline in the overall score indicate improvement.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 52

Population: Full analysis set with available data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MethotrexateChange From Baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 52-0.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
AdalimumabChange From Baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 52-0.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Adalimumab + MethotrexateChange From Baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 52-1.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
p-value: <0.001Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) During the Double-blind Treatment Phase

The Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index is a patient-reported questionnaire specific for rheumatoid arthritis. It consists of 20 questions referring to eight domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and daily activities. Participants assessed their ability to do each task over the past week using the following response categories: without any difficulty (0); with some difficulty (1); with much difficulty (2); and unable to do (3). Scores on each task were summed and averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 to 3, where zero represents no disability and three very severe, high-dependency disability. Negative mean changes from Baseline in the overall score indicate improvement.

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 12, 26, 76, and 104

Population: Full analysis set with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MethotrexateChange From Baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) During the Double-blind Treatment PhaseWeek 12 [N=236, 246, 252]-0.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
MethotrexateChange From Baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) During the Double-blind Treatment PhaseWeek 26 [N=217, 222, 240]-0.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
MethotrexateChange From Baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) During the Double-blind Treatment PhaseWeek 76 [N= 176, 175, 207]-0.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
MethotrexateChange From Baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) During the Double-blind Treatment PhaseWeek 104 [166, 162, 201]-0.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
AdalimumabChange From Baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) During the Double-blind Treatment PhaseWeek 104 [166, 162, 201]-0.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
AdalimumabChange From Baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) During the Double-blind Treatment PhaseWeek 12 [N=236, 246, 252]-0.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
AdalimumabChange From Baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) During the Double-blind Treatment PhaseWeek 76 [N= 176, 175, 207]-0.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
AdalimumabChange From Baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) During the Double-blind Treatment PhaseWeek 26 [N=217, 222, 240]-0.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Adalimumab + MethotrexateChange From Baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) During the Double-blind Treatment PhaseWeek 104 [166, 162, 201]-1.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Adalimumab + MethotrexateChange From Baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) During the Double-blind Treatment PhaseWeek 26 [N=217, 222, 240]-0.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
Adalimumab + MethotrexateChange From Baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) During the Double-blind Treatment PhaseWeek 76 [N= 176, 175, 207]-1.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Adalimumab + MethotrexateChange From Baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) During the Double-blind Treatment PhaseWeek 12 [N=236, 246, 252]-0.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Over 10 Years by Adalimumab Exposure

The Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index is a patient-reported questionnaire specific for rheumatoid arthritis. It consists of 20 questions referring to eight domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and daily activities. Participants assessed their ability to do each task over the past week using the following response categories: without any difficulty (0); with some difficulty (1); with much difficulty (2); and unable to do (3). Scores on each task were summed and averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 to 3, where zero represents no disability and three very severe, high-dependency disability. Negative mean changes from Baseline in the overall score indicate improvement.

Time frame: Baseline and Years 1, 2, 5, and 10. Baseline was the last value prior to the first dose of adalimumab. For patients randomized to the MTX arm in the DB phase, Baseline was the last visit prior to the first adalimumab dose at Week 106.

Population: ITT Analysis Set, with available data. N indicates patients with non-missing data at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MethotrexateChange From Baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Over 10 Years by Adalimumab ExposureYear 1 [N=407]-0.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.68
MethotrexateChange From Baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Over 10 Years by Adalimumab ExposureYear 2 [N=390]-0.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
MethotrexateChange From Baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Over 10 Years by Adalimumab ExposureYear 5 [N=344]-0.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.73
MethotrexateChange From Baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Over 10 Years by Adalimumab ExposureYear 10 [N=170]-0.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.73
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Mental Component of the Short Form-36 Health Status Survey (SF-36) at Week 52

The SF-36 determined participants' overall quality of life by assessing 1) limitations in physical functioning due to health problems; 2) limitations in usual role because of physical health problems; 3) bodily pain; 4) general health perceptions; 5) vitality; 6) limitations in social functioning because of physical or emotional problems; 7) limitations in usual role due to emotional problems; and 8) general mental health. Items 5-8 comprise the mental component of the SF-36. Scores on each item were summed and averaged (range = 0-100); increases from Baseline indicate improvement.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 52

Population: Full analysis set with available data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MethotrexateChange From Baseline in the Mental Component of the Short Form-36 Health Status Survey (SF-36) at Week 526.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11
AdalimumabChange From Baseline in the Mental Component of the Short Form-36 Health Status Survey (SF-36) at Week 527.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.3
Adalimumab + MethotrexateChange From Baseline in the Mental Component of the Short Form-36 Health Status Survey (SF-36) at Week 527.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.1
p-value: 0.5402Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Physical Component of the Short Form-36 Health Status Survey (SF-36) at Week 52

The SF-36 determined participants' overall quality of life by assessing 1) limitations in physical functioning due to health problems; 2) limitations in usual role because of physical health problems; 3) bodily pain; 4) general health perceptions; 5) vitality; 6) limitations in social functioning because of physical or emotional problems; 7) limitations in usual role due to emotional problems; and 8) general mental health. Items 1-4 comprise the physical component of the SF-36. Scores on each item were summed and averaged (range = 0-100); increases from Baseline indicate improvement.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 52

Population: Full analysis set with available data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MethotrexateChange From Baseline in the Physical Component of the Short Form-36 Health Status Survey (SF-36) at Week 5212.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.6
AdalimumabChange From Baseline in the Physical Component of the Short Form-36 Health Status Survey (SF-36) at Week 5212.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10
Adalimumab + MethotrexateChange From Baseline in the Physical Component of the Short Form-36 Health Status Survey (SF-36) at Week 5216.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.2
p-value: <0.001Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Short Form-36 Health Status Survey (SF-36) During the Double-blind Treatment Phase

The SF-36 determined participants' overall quality of life by assessing 1) limitations in physical functioning due to health problems; 2) limitations in usual role because of physical health problems; 3) bodily pain; 4) general health perceptions; 5) vitality; 6) limitations in social functioning because of physical or emotional problems; 7) limitations in usual role due to emotional problems; and 8) general mental health. Items 1-4 comprise the physical component and items 5-8 comprise the mental component of the SF-36. Scores on each item were summed and averaged (range = 0-100); increases from Baseline indicate improvement.

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 26 and 104

Population: Full analysis set with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MethotrexateChange From Baseline in the Short Form-36 Health Status Survey (SF-36) During the Double-blind Treatment PhasePhysical Component: Week 26 [N=199, 204, 221]11.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10
MethotrexateChange From Baseline in the Short Form-36 Health Status Survey (SF-36) During the Double-blind Treatment PhasePhysical Component: Week 104 [160, 157, 189]12.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.3
MethotrexateChange From Baseline in the Short Form-36 Health Status Survey (SF-36) During the Double-blind Treatment PhaseMental Component: Week 26 [N=199, 204, 221]7.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.6
MethotrexateChange From Baseline in the Short Form-36 Health Status Survey (SF-36) During the Double-blind Treatment PhaseMental Component: Week 104 [N=160, 157, 189]8.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.9
AdalimumabChange From Baseline in the Short Form-36 Health Status Survey (SF-36) During the Double-blind Treatment PhaseMental Component: Week 104 [N=160, 157, 189]6.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.5
AdalimumabChange From Baseline in the Short Form-36 Health Status Survey (SF-36) During the Double-blind Treatment PhasePhysical Component: Week 26 [N=199, 204, 221]10.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.2
AdalimumabChange From Baseline in the Short Form-36 Health Status Survey (SF-36) During the Double-blind Treatment PhaseMental Component: Week 26 [N=199, 204, 221]5.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.5
AdalimumabChange From Baseline in the Short Form-36 Health Status Survey (SF-36) During the Double-blind Treatment PhasePhysical Component: Week 104 [160, 157, 189]13.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.7
Adalimumab + MethotrexateChange From Baseline in the Short Form-36 Health Status Survey (SF-36) During the Double-blind Treatment PhaseMental Component: Week 104 [N=160, 157, 189]6.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12
Adalimumab + MethotrexateChange From Baseline in the Short Form-36 Health Status Survey (SF-36) During the Double-blind Treatment PhasePhysical Component: Week 104 [160, 157, 189]16.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.2
Adalimumab + MethotrexateChange From Baseline in the Short Form-36 Health Status Survey (SF-36) During the Double-blind Treatment PhaseMental Component: Week 26 [N=199, 204, 221]6.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.1
Adalimumab + MethotrexateChange From Baseline in the Short Form-36 Health Status Survey (SF-36) During the Double-blind Treatment PhasePhysical Component: Week 26 [N=199, 204, 221]14.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.2
Secondary

Composite Score of ACR50 Plus No Change in Modified Total Sharp Score

Time frame: Year 10

Population: This outcome measure was not analyzed due to a protocol amendment.

Secondary

Number of Participants Meeting ACR20 Response Criteria Over 10 Years by Adalimumab Exposure

American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) response. A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline were met: * ≥ 20% improvement in tender joint count; * ≥ 20% improvement in swollen joint count; and * ≥ 20% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: * Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale \[VAS\]); * Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); * Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); * Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index \[HAQ-DI\]); * Acute phase reactant value (C-Reactive Protein). Baseline is the last value prior to the first dose of adalimumab. For participants randomized to the methotrexate (MTX) arm in the double-blind (DB) phase, Baseline was the last visit prior to the first adalimumab dose at Week 106 of the open-label (OL) phase.

Time frame: Baseline and after 1, 2, 5, and 10 years of adalimumab exposure. Baseline was the last value prior to the first dose of adalimumab.

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) Analysis Set (all patients who received at least 1 dose of adalimumab during the study, including patients who received their first dose during the DB phase and those who received MTX during the DB phase and adalimumab in the OL phase) with available ACR data. N indicates patients with non-missing data at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
MethotrexateNumber of Participants Meeting ACR20 Response Criteria Over 10 Years by Adalimumab ExposureYear 5 [N=325]231 participants
MethotrexateNumber of Participants Meeting ACR20 Response Criteria Over 10 Years by Adalimumab ExposureYear 1 [N=410]340 participants
MethotrexateNumber of Participants Meeting ACR20 Response Criteria Over 10 Years by Adalimumab ExposureYear 2 [N=385]332 participants
MethotrexateNumber of Participants Meeting ACR20 Response Criteria Over 10 Years by Adalimumab ExposureYear 10 [N=170]154 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Meeting ACR50 Response Criteria Over 10 Years by Adalimumab Exposure

American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) response. A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline were met: * ≥ 50% improvement in tender joint count; * ≥ 50% improvement in swollen joint count; and * ≥ 50% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: * Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale \[VAS\]); * Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); * Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); * Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index \[HAQ-DI\]); * Acute phase reactant value (C-Reactive Protein). Baseline is the last value prior to the first dose of adalimumab. For patients randomized to the methotrexate (MTX) arm in the double-blind (DB) phase, Baseline was the last visit prior to the first adalimumab dose at Week 106 of the open-label (OL) phase.

Time frame: Baseline and after 1, 2, 5, and 10 years of adalimumab exposure. Baseline was the last value prior to the first dose of adalimumab.

Population: ITT Analysis Set with available ACR data. N indicates patients with non-missing data at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
MethotrexateNumber of Participants Meeting ACR50 Response Criteria Over 10 Years by Adalimumab ExposureYear 1 [N=410]269 participants
MethotrexateNumber of Participants Meeting ACR50 Response Criteria Over 10 Years by Adalimumab ExposureYear 2 [N=385]266 participants
MethotrexateNumber of Participants Meeting ACR50 Response Criteria Over 10 Years by Adalimumab ExposureYear 5 [N=325]194 participants
MethotrexateNumber of Participants Meeting ACR50 Response Criteria Over 10 Years by Adalimumab ExposureYear 10 [N=170]127 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Meeting ACR70 Response Criteria Over 10 Years by Adalimumab Exposure

American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) response. A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline were met: * ≥ 70% improvement in tender joint count; * ≥ 70% improvement in swollen joint count; and * ≥ 70% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: * Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale \[VAS\]); * Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); * Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); * Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index \[HAQ-DI\]); * Acute phase reactant value (C-Reactive Protein). Baseline is the last value prior to the first dose of adalimumab. For patients randomized to the methotrexate (MTX) arm in the double-blind (DB) phase, Baseline was the last visit prior to the first adalimumab dose at Week 106 of the open-label (OL) phase.

Time frame: Baseline and after 1, 2, 5, and 10 years of adalimumab exposure. Baseline was the last value prior to the first dose of adalimumab.

Population: ITT Analysis Set with available data. N indicates patients with non-missing data at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
MethotrexateNumber of Participants Meeting ACR70 Response Criteria Over 10 Years by Adalimumab ExposureYear 1 [N=410]186 participants
MethotrexateNumber of Participants Meeting ACR70 Response Criteria Over 10 Years by Adalimumab ExposureYear 2 [N=385]207 participants
MethotrexateNumber of Participants Meeting ACR70 Response Criteria Over 10 Years by Adalimumab ExposureYear 5 [N=325]153 participants
MethotrexateNumber of Participants Meeting ACR70 Response Criteria Over 10 Years by Adalimumab ExposureYear 10 [N=170]102 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response Criteria During the Double-blind Phase

American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) response. A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline were met: * ≥ 20% improvement in tender joint count; * ≥ 20% improvement in swollen joint count; and * ≥ 20% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: * Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale \[VAS\]); * Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); * Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); * Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index \[HAQ-DI\]); * Acute phase reactant value (C-Reactive Protein). Participants withdrawing early were considered non-responders.

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 26, 52, 76, and 104

Population: Full analysis set. Participants with insufficient data to calculate ACR20 or who withdrew early were considered non-responders.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
MethotrexateNumber of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response Criteria During the Double-blind PhaseWeek 26158 participants
MethotrexateNumber of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response Criteria During the Double-blind PhaseWeek 52161 participants
MethotrexateNumber of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response Criteria During the Double-blind PhaseWeek 76154 participants
MethotrexateNumber of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response Criteria During the Double-blind PhaseWeek 104144 participants
AdalimumabNumber of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response Criteria During the Double-blind PhaseWeek 104135 participants
AdalimumabNumber of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response Criteria During the Double-blind PhaseWeek 26146 participants
AdalimumabNumber of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response Criteria During the Double-blind PhaseWeek 76137 participants
AdalimumabNumber of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response Criteria During the Double-blind PhaseWeek 52149 participants
Adalimumab + MethotrexateNumber of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response Criteria During the Double-blind PhaseWeek 104186 participants
Adalimumab + MethotrexateNumber of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response Criteria During the Double-blind PhaseWeek 52195 participants
Adalimumab + MethotrexateNumber of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response Criteria During the Double-blind PhaseWeek 76185 participants
Adalimumab + MethotrexateNumber of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response Criteria During the Double-blind PhaseWeek 26184 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response Criteria at Week 104

American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) response. A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline were met: * ≥ 50% improvement in tender joint count; * ≥ 50% improvement in swollen joint count; and * ≥ 50% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: * Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale \[VAS\]); * Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); * Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); * Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index \[HAQ-DI\]); * Acute phase reactant value (C-Reactive Protein). Participants withdrawing early were considered non-responders.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 104

Population: Full analysis set. Participants with insufficient data to calculate ACR50 at Week 104 or who withdrew early were considered non-responders.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
MethotrexateNumber of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response Criteria at Week 104110 participants
AdalimumabNumber of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response Criteria at Week 104101 participants
Adalimumab + MethotrexateNumber of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response Criteria at Week 104158 participants
p-value: <0.001Chi-squared
Secondary

Number of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response Criteria at Weeks 26 and 76

American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) response. A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline were met: * ≥ 50% improvement in tender joint count; * ≥ 50% improvement in swollen joint count; and * ≥ 50% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: * Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale \[VAS\]); * Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); * Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); * Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index \[HAQ-DI\]); * Acute phase reactant value (C-Reactive Protein). Participants withdrawing early were considered non-responders.

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 26 and 76

Population: Full analysis set. Participants with insufficient data to calculate ACR50 or who withdrew early were considered non-responders.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
MethotrexateNumber of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response Criteria at Weeks 26 and 76Week 26104 participants
MethotrexateNumber of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response Criteria at Weeks 26 and 76Week 76114 participants
AdalimumabNumber of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response Criteria at Weeks 26 and 76Week 2696 participants
AdalimumabNumber of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response Criteria at Weeks 26 and 76Week 76114 participants
Adalimumab + MethotrexateNumber of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response Criteria at Weeks 26 and 76Week 26157 participants
Adalimumab + MethotrexateNumber of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response Criteria at Weeks 26 and 76Week 76161 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response Criteria During the Double-blind Phase

American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) response. A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline were met: * ≥ 70% improvement in tender joint count; * ≥ 70% improvement in swollen joint count; and * ≥ 70% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: * Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale \[VAS\]); * Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); * Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); * Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index \[HAQ-DI\]); * Acute phase reactant value (C-Reactive Protein). Participants withdrawing early were considered non-responders.

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 26, 52, 76, and 104

Population: Full analysis set. Participants with insufficient data to calculate ACR70 or who withdrew early were considered non-responders.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
MethotrexateNumber of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response Criteria During the Double-blind PhaseWeek 2657 participants
MethotrexateNumber of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response Criteria During the Double-blind PhaseWeek 5270 participants
MethotrexateNumber of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response Criteria During the Double-blind PhaseWeek 7675 participants
MethotrexateNumber of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response Criteria During the Double-blind PhaseWeek 10473 participants
AdalimumabNumber of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response Criteria During the Double-blind PhaseWeek 10477 participants
AdalimumabNumber of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response Criteria During the Double-blind PhaseWeek 2654 participants
AdalimumabNumber of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response Criteria During the Double-blind PhaseWeek 7679 participants
AdalimumabNumber of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response Criteria During the Double-blind PhaseWeek 5271 participants
Adalimumab + MethotrexateNumber of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response Criteria During the Double-blind PhaseWeek 104125 participants
Adalimumab + MethotrexateNumber of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response Criteria During the Double-blind PhaseWeek 52122 participants
Adalimumab + MethotrexateNumber of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response Criteria During the Double-blind PhaseWeek 76127 participants
Adalimumab + MethotrexateNumber of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response Criteria During the Double-blind PhaseWeek 26114 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Who Achieved Clinical Remission, Defined as a Disease Activity 28 (DAS28) Score < 2.6 at Week 52

The DAS28 is a validated index of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity. Twenty-eight tender joint counts, 28 swollen joint counts, C reactive protein, and general health were included in the DAS28 score. Scores on the DAS28 range from 0 to 10. A DAS28 score \>5.1 indicates high disease activity, a DAS28 score \<3.2 indicates low disease activity, and a DAS28 score \<2.6 indicates clinical remission.

Time frame: Week 52

Population: Full analysis set. Participants with insufficient data to calculate DAS28 at Week 52 or who withdrew early were considered non-responders.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
MethotrexateNumber of Participants Who Achieved Clinical Remission, Defined as a Disease Activity 28 (DAS28) Score < 2.6 at Week 5253 participants
AdalimumabNumber of Participants Who Achieved Clinical Remission, Defined as a Disease Activity 28 (DAS28) Score < 2.6 at Week 5264 participants
Adalimumab + MethotrexateNumber of Participants Who Achieved Clinical Remission, Defined as a Disease Activity 28 (DAS28) Score < 2.6 at Week 52115 participants
p-value: <0.001Chi-squared
Secondary

Number of Participants With a Major Clinical Response Over 10 Years by Adalimumab Exposure

A major clinical response was defined as maintenance of an ACR70 response for at least a 6-month continuous period at any time during the study following the first dose of adalimumab. A participant was a responder if the following criteria for improvement from Baseline were met: * ≥ 70% improvement in tender joint count; * ≥ 70% improvement in swollen joint count; and * ≥ 70% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: * Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale \[VAS\]); * Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); * Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); * Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index \[HAQ-DI\]); * Acute phase reactant value (C-Reactive Protein).

Time frame: From the first dose of adalimumab (at Week 1 or Week 106 for patients initially randomized to methotrexate in the DB phase) to Year 10

Population: ITT Analysis Set for participants with non-missing ACR data.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
MethotrexateNumber of Participants With a Major Clinical Response Over 10 Years by Adalimumab Exposure273 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With DAS28 < 2.6 and < 3.2 Over 10 Years by Adalimumab Exposure

The DAS28 is a composite score of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity derived from the following variables: * 28 tender joint counts, * 28 swollen joint counts, * C-reactive protein, and * Patient's global assessment of disease activity. Scores on the DAS28 range from 0 to 10. A DAS28 score higher than 5.1 indicates high disease activity, a DAS28 score less than 3.2 indicates low disease activity, and a DAS28 score less than 2.6 indicates clinical remission.

Time frame: After 1, 2, 5, and 10 years of adalimumab exposure

Population: ITT Analysis Set, with available data. The Number of Participants Analyzed indicates patients with non-missing DAS28 scores at any post-baseline time point; N indicates patients with non-missing data at each specified time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
MethotrexateNumber of Participants With DAS28 < 2.6 and < 3.2 Over 10 Years by Adalimumab ExposureYear 1 [N=405]173 participants
MethotrexateNumber of Participants With DAS28 < 2.6 and < 3.2 Over 10 Years by Adalimumab ExposureYear 2 [N=389]215 participants
MethotrexateNumber of Participants With DAS28 < 2.6 and < 3.2 Over 10 Years by Adalimumab ExposureYear 5 [N=333]190 participants
MethotrexateNumber of Participants With DAS28 < 2.6 and < 3.2 Over 10 Years by Adalimumab ExposureYear 10 [N=159]109 participants
AdalimumabNumber of Participants With DAS28 < 2.6 and < 3.2 Over 10 Years by Adalimumab ExposureYear 10 [N=159]135 participants
AdalimumabNumber of Participants With DAS28 < 2.6 and < 3.2 Over 10 Years by Adalimumab ExposureYear 1 [N=405]244 participants
AdalimumabNumber of Participants With DAS28 < 2.6 and < 3.2 Over 10 Years by Adalimumab ExposureYear 5 [N=333]244 participants
AdalimumabNumber of Participants With DAS28 < 2.6 and < 3.2 Over 10 Years by Adalimumab ExposureYear 2 [N=389]271 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Improvement in HAQ-DI by 0.22 and 0.5 Units Over 10 Years by Adalimumab Exposure

The Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) is a patient-reported questionnaire specific for rheumatoid arthritis. It consists of 20 questions referring to eight domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and daily activities. Participants assessed their ability to do each task over the past week using the following response categories: without any difficulty (0); with some difficulty (1); with much difficulty (2); and unable to do (3). Scores on each task were summed and averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 to 3, where zero represents no disability and three very severe, high-dependency disability. A decrease in the HAQ-DI score represents an improvement in physical function; a clinically significant improvement is defined as a decrease of least 0.22 from Baseline in the HAQ-DI score. The number of participants with improvement in HAQ-DI of at least 0.22 and 0.5 units from Baseline is reported.

Time frame: Baseline and Years 1, 2, 5, and 10. Baseline was the last value prior to the first dose of adalimumab. For patients randomized to the MTX arm in the DB phase, Baseline was the last visit prior to the first adalimumab dose at Week 106.

Population: ITT Analysis Set, with available data. The Number of Participants Analyzed indicates patients with non-missing HAQ-DI scores at any post-baseline time point; N indicates patients with non-missing data at each specified time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Improvement in HAQ-DI by 0.22 and 0.5 Units Over 10 Years by Adalimumab ExposureYear 1 [N=407]353 participants
MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Improvement in HAQ-DI by 0.22 and 0.5 Units Over 10 Years by Adalimumab ExposureYear 2 [N=390]324 participants
MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Improvement in HAQ-DI by 0.22 and 0.5 Units Over 10 Years by Adalimumab ExposureYear 5 [N=344]239 participants
MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Improvement in HAQ-DI by 0.22 and 0.5 Units Over 10 Years by Adalimumab ExposureYear 10 [N=170]140 participants
AdalimumabNumber of Participants With Improvement in HAQ-DI by 0.22 and 0.5 Units Over 10 Years by Adalimumab ExposureYear 10 [N=170]112 participants
AdalimumabNumber of Participants With Improvement in HAQ-DI by 0.22 and 0.5 Units Over 10 Years by Adalimumab ExposureYear 1 [N=407]285 participants
AdalimumabNumber of Participants With Improvement in HAQ-DI by 0.22 and 0.5 Units Over 10 Years by Adalimumab ExposureYear 5 [N=344]188 participants
AdalimumabNumber of Participants With Improvement in HAQ-DI by 0.22 and 0.5 Units Over 10 Years by Adalimumab ExposureYear 2 [N=390]265 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Improvement in the HAQ-DI Score ≥ 0.3 During the Double-blind Treatment Phase

The Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index is a patient-reported questionnaire specific for rheumatoid arthritis. It consists of 20 questions referring to eight domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and daily activities. Participants assessed their ability to do each task over the past week using the following response categories: without any difficulty (0); with some difficulty (1); with much difficulty (2); and unable to do (3). Scores on each task were summed and averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 to 3, where zero represents no disability and three very severe, high-dependency disability.

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 26, 52, 76, and 104

Population: Full analysis set. Missing values were considered to be \< 0.3.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Improvement in the HAQ-DI Score ≥ 0.3 During the Double-blind Treatment PhaseWeek 26172 participants
MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Improvement in the HAQ-DI Score ≥ 0.3 During the Double-blind Treatment PhaseWeek 52158 participants
MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Improvement in the HAQ-DI Score ≥ 0.3 During the Double-blind Treatment PhaseWeek 76144 participants
MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Improvement in the HAQ-DI Score ≥ 0.3 During the Double-blind Treatment PhaseWeek 104137 participants
AdalimumabNumber of Participants With Improvement in the HAQ-DI Score ≥ 0.3 During the Double-blind Treatment PhaseWeek 104132 participants
AdalimumabNumber of Participants With Improvement in the HAQ-DI Score ≥ 0.3 During the Double-blind Treatment PhaseWeek 26169 participants
AdalimumabNumber of Participants With Improvement in the HAQ-DI Score ≥ 0.3 During the Double-blind Treatment PhaseWeek 76145 participants
AdalimumabNumber of Participants With Improvement in the HAQ-DI Score ≥ 0.3 During the Double-blind Treatment PhaseWeek 52151 participants
Adalimumab + MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Improvement in the HAQ-DI Score ≥ 0.3 During the Double-blind Treatment PhaseWeek 104171 participants
Adalimumab + MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Improvement in the HAQ-DI Score ≥ 0.3 During the Double-blind Treatment PhaseWeek 52186 participants
Adalimumab + MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Improvement in the HAQ-DI Score ≥ 0.3 During the Double-blind Treatment PhaseWeek 76173 participants
Adalimumab + MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Improvement in the HAQ-DI Score ≥ 0.3 During the Double-blind Treatment PhaseWeek 26200 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Major Clinical Response After 104 Weeks of Treatment

Major clinical response was defined as an American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) response for any six continuous months, over 104 weeks of treatment. A participant was a responder if the following criteria for improvement from Baseline were met: * ≥ 70% improvement in tender joint count; * ≥ 70% improvement in swollen joint count; and * ≥ 70% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: * Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale \[VAS\]); * Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); * Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); * Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index \[HAQ-DI\]); * Acute phase reactant value (C-Reactive Protein). Participants withdrawing early were non-responders.

Time frame: Any 6 continuous months from Baseline to Week 104

Population: Full analysis set.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Major Clinical Response After 104 Weeks of Treatment70 participants
AdalimumabNumber of Participants With Major Clinical Response After 104 Weeks of Treatment67 participants
Adalimumab + MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Major Clinical Response After 104 Weeks of Treatment130 participants
p-value: <0.001Chi-squared
Secondary

Number of Participants With No Erosions at Baseline and No New Erosions at Weeks 52 and 104

The number of participants with no erosions at Baseline and no erosions at Weeks 52 and 104, where no erosions and no new erosions are defined as an erosion score = 0. Digitized images of radiographs of hands and feet obtained at screening and during the study were scored in a blinded manner. Joints on each hand/wrist (17 joints) and each forefoot (6 joints) were scored for erosions on a scale of 0 = no erosions; 1 = 1 discrete erosion or ≤20% joint involvement; 2 = 2 separate quadrants with erosion or 21-40% joint involvement; 3 = 3 separate quadrants with erosion or 41-60% joint involvement; 4 = all 4 quadrants with erosion or 61-80% joint involvement; and 5 = extensive destruction with \>80% joint involvement. Scores were summed to calculate the total erosion score, which ranges from 0 (no erosion) to 230 (worst).

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 52 and 104

Population: Full analysis set participants with no erosions at Baseline and non-missing data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
MethotrexateNumber of Participants With No Erosions at Baseline and No New Erosions at Weeks 52 and 104Week 528 participants
MethotrexateNumber of Participants With No Erosions at Baseline and No New Erosions at Weeks 52 and 104Week 1047 participants
AdalimumabNumber of Participants With No Erosions at Baseline and No New Erosions at Weeks 52 and 104Week 5210 participants
AdalimumabNumber of Participants With No Erosions at Baseline and No New Erosions at Weeks 52 and 104Week 1048 participants
Adalimumab + MethotrexateNumber of Participants With No Erosions at Baseline and No New Erosions at Weeks 52 and 104Week 5213 participants
Adalimumab + MethotrexateNumber of Participants With No Erosions at Baseline and No New Erosions at Weeks 52 and 104Week 10411 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Non-Involved Joints at Baseline and No Newly Involved Joints at Weeks 52 and 104

Number of participants with non-involved joints at Baseline and no newly involved joints at Weeks 52 and 104, where involved joints or no newly involved joints are defined as modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) = 0. Digitized images of radiographs of hands and feet obtained at screening and during the study were scored in a blinded manner. Joints were scored for erosions on a scale of 0 (no damage) to 5 (complete collapse) and joint space narrowing on a scale of 0 (no damage) to 4 (ankylosis or complete dislocation). Erosion scores and narrowing scores were added to obtain the mTSS (range = 0 \[normal\] to 398 \[maximal disease\]).

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 52 and 104

Population: Full analysis set participants with non-involved joints at Baseline and non-missing data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Non-Involved Joints at Baseline and No Newly Involved Joints at Weeks 52 and 104Week 524 participants
MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Non-Involved Joints at Baseline and No Newly Involved Joints at Weeks 52 and 104Week 1043 participants
AdalimumabNumber of Participants With Non-Involved Joints at Baseline and No Newly Involved Joints at Weeks 52 and 104Week 529 participants
AdalimumabNumber of Participants With Non-Involved Joints at Baseline and No Newly Involved Joints at Weeks 52 and 104Week 1047 participants
Adalimumab + MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Non-Involved Joints at Baseline and No Newly Involved Joints at Weeks 52 and 104Week 1049 participants
Adalimumab + MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Non-Involved Joints at Baseline and No Newly Involved Joints at Weeks 52 and 104Week 5212 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With No Radiographic Progression Over 10 Years

The modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) is a measure of change in joint health. Digitized images of radiographs of hands and feet obtained at screening and during the study were scored in a blinded manner. Joints were scored for erosions on a scale of 0 (no damage) to 5 (complete collapse) and joint space narrowing on a scale of 0 (no damage) to 4 (ankylosis or complete dislocation). Erosion scores and narrowing scores were added to obtain the mTSS (range = 0 \[normal\] to 398 \[maximal disease\]). An increase in mTSS from Baseline represents disease progression and/or joint worsening, no change represents halting of disease progression, and a decrease represents improvement. The number of participants with change from Baseline ≤ 0.5 and ≤ 0 is reported as a measure of no disease progression.

Time frame: Baseline (prior to first study drug treatment) and Years 2 and 10.

Population: ITT Analysis Set, with available data. N indicates patients with non-missing radiographic data at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
MethotrexateNumber of Participants With No Radiographic Progression Over 10 YearsChange ≤ 0.5 at Year 2 [N=83, 92, 89]36 participants
MethotrexateNumber of Participants With No Radiographic Progression Over 10 YearsChange ≤ 0.5 at Year 10 [N=83, 93, 90]26 participants
MethotrexateNumber of Participants With No Radiographic Progression Over 10 YearsChange ≤ 0 at Year 2 [N=83, 92, 89]22 participants
MethotrexateNumber of Participants With No Radiographic Progression Over 10 YearsChange ≤ 0 at Year 10 [N=83, 93, 90]19 participants
AdalimumabNumber of Participants With No Radiographic Progression Over 10 YearsChange ≤ 0 at Year 10 [N=83, 93, 90]16 participants
AdalimumabNumber of Participants With No Radiographic Progression Over 10 YearsChange ≤ 0.5 at Year 2 [N=83, 92, 89]40 participants
AdalimumabNumber of Participants With No Radiographic Progression Over 10 YearsChange ≤ 0 at Year 2 [N=83, 92, 89]30 participants
AdalimumabNumber of Participants With No Radiographic Progression Over 10 YearsChange ≤ 0.5 at Year 10 [N=83, 93, 90]22 participants
Adalimumab + MethotrexateNumber of Participants With No Radiographic Progression Over 10 YearsChange ≤ 0 at Year 10 [N=83, 93, 90]29 participants
Adalimumab + MethotrexateNumber of Participants With No Radiographic Progression Over 10 YearsChange ≤ 0.5 at Year 10 [N=83, 93, 90]33 participants
Adalimumab + MethotrexateNumber of Participants With No Radiographic Progression Over 10 YearsChange ≤ 0 at Year 2 [N=83, 92, 89]51 participants
Adalimumab + MethotrexateNumber of Participants With No Radiographic Progression Over 10 YearsChange ≤ 0.5 at Year 2 [N=83, 92, 89]65 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With No Worsening in Modified Total Sharp Score or Components During the Double-blind Treatment Phase

The number of participants with no worsening in the modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) and in erosion and joint space narrowing (JSN) scores, where no worsening is defined as a change from Baseline of ≤ 0 in mTSS, erosion score and JSN score, at Weeks 52 and 104. Digitized images of radiographs of hands and feet obtained at screening and during the study were scored in a blinded manner. Joints were scored for erosions on a scale of 0 (no damage) to 5 (complete collapse) and joint space narrowing on a scale of 0 (no damage) to 4 (ankylosis or complete dislocation). Erosion scores and narrowing scores were added to obtain the mTSS (range = 0 \[normal\] to 398 \[maximal disease\]). An increase in mTSS from Baseline represents disease progression and/or joint worsening, no change represents halting of disease progression, and a decrease represents improvement.

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 52 and 104

Population: Full analysis set. Participants with missing data or who withdrew early were considered non-responders.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
MethotrexateNumber of Participants With No Worsening in Modified Total Sharp Score or Components During the Double-blind Treatment PhaseModified Total Sharp Score: Week 5278 participants
MethotrexateNumber of Participants With No Worsening in Modified Total Sharp Score or Components During the Double-blind Treatment PhaseModified Total Sharp Score: Week 10470 participants
MethotrexateNumber of Participants With No Worsening in Modified Total Sharp Score or Components During the Double-blind Treatment PhaseErosion Scoe: Week 5291 participants
MethotrexateNumber of Participants With No Worsening in Modified Total Sharp Score or Components During the Double-blind Treatment PhaseErosion Score: Week 10481 participants
MethotrexateNumber of Participants With No Worsening in Modified Total Sharp Score or Components During the Double-blind Treatment PhaseJoint Space Narrowing Score: Week 52127 participants
MethotrexateNumber of Participants With No Worsening in Modified Total Sharp Score or Components During the Double-blind Treatment PhaseJoint Space Narrowing Score: Week 104112 participants
AdalimumabNumber of Participants With No Worsening in Modified Total Sharp Score or Components During the Double-blind Treatment PhaseJoint Space Narrowing Score: Week 104147 participants
AdalimumabNumber of Participants With No Worsening in Modified Total Sharp Score or Components During the Double-blind Treatment PhaseModified Total Sharp Score: Week 52112 participants
AdalimumabNumber of Participants With No Worsening in Modified Total Sharp Score or Components During the Double-blind Treatment PhaseErosion Score: Week 104121 participants
AdalimumabNumber of Participants With No Worsening in Modified Total Sharp Score or Components During the Double-blind Treatment PhaseJoint Space Narrowing Score: Week 52159 participants
AdalimumabNumber of Participants With No Worsening in Modified Total Sharp Score or Components During the Double-blind Treatment PhaseModified Total Sharp Score: Week 104105 participants
AdalimumabNumber of Participants With No Worsening in Modified Total Sharp Score or Components During the Double-blind Treatment PhaseErosion Scoe: Week 52133 participants
Adalimumab + MethotrexateNumber of Participants With No Worsening in Modified Total Sharp Score or Components During the Double-blind Treatment PhaseModified Total Sharp Score: Week 104136 participants
Adalimumab + MethotrexateNumber of Participants With No Worsening in Modified Total Sharp Score or Components During the Double-blind Treatment PhaseErosion Scoe: Week 52158 participants
Adalimumab + MethotrexateNumber of Participants With No Worsening in Modified Total Sharp Score or Components During the Double-blind Treatment PhaseJoint Space Narrowing Score: Week 104175 participants
Adalimumab + MethotrexateNumber of Participants With No Worsening in Modified Total Sharp Score or Components During the Double-blind Treatment PhaseErosion Score: Week 104148 participants
Adalimumab + MethotrexateNumber of Participants With No Worsening in Modified Total Sharp Score or Components During the Double-blind Treatment PhaseModified Total Sharp Score: Week 52141 participants
Adalimumab + MethotrexateNumber of Participants With No Worsening in Modified Total Sharp Score or Components During the Double-blind Treatment PhaseJoint Space Narrowing Score: Week 52190 participants
Secondary

Numeric American College of Rheumatology (ACR-N) During the Double-blind Treatment Phase

ACR-N is a composite, continuous variable which measures the percentage of improvement from Baseline in individual participants based on the 7 core set variables of the ACR. ACR-N is defined as the smallest percent change from Baseline of 3 measures: tender joint counts (TJC), swollen joint counts (SJC), and the median percent improvement in the 5 remaining measures (Patient's Assessment of Pain, Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity, Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity, Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index \[HAQ-DI\], and C-Reactive Protein). A positive ACR-N value indicates improvement; a negative ACR-N value indicates worsening; ACR-N of 0 indicates no change.

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 26, 52, 76, and 104

Population: Full analysis set with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MethotrexateNumeric American College of Rheumatology (ACR-N) During the Double-blind Treatment PhaseWeek 26 [N=218, 224, 244]44.7 percent changeStandard Deviation 42.2
MethotrexateNumeric American College of Rheumatology (ACR-N) During the Double-blind Treatment PhaseWeek 52 [N=194, 193, 220]50.2 percent changeStandard Deviation 48.2
MethotrexateNumeric American College of Rheumatology (ACR-N) During the Double-blind Treatment PhaseWeek 76 [N=181, 179, 211]56.1 percent changeStandard Deviation 38.1
MethotrexateNumeric American College of Rheumatology (ACR-N) During the Double-blind Treatment PhaseWeek 104 [N=168, 167, 203]57.3 percent changeStandard Deviation 37.1
AdalimumabNumeric American College of Rheumatology (ACR-N) During the Double-blind Treatment PhaseWeek 104 [N=168, 167, 203]54.0 percent changeStandard Deviation 42.7
AdalimumabNumeric American College of Rheumatology (ACR-N) During the Double-blind Treatment PhaseWeek 26 [N=218, 224, 244]39.1 percent changeStandard Deviation 43.3
AdalimumabNumeric American College of Rheumatology (ACR-N) During the Double-blind Treatment PhaseWeek 76 [N=181, 179, 211]51.5 percent changeStandard Deviation 56.8
AdalimumabNumeric American College of Rheumatology (ACR-N) During the Double-blind Treatment PhaseWeek 52 [N=194, 193, 220]44.4 percent changeStandard Deviation 52.2
Adalimumab + MethotrexateNumeric American College of Rheumatology (ACR-N) During the Double-blind Treatment PhaseWeek 104 [N=168, 167, 203]71.4 percent changeStandard Deviation 31
Adalimumab + MethotrexateNumeric American College of Rheumatology (ACR-N) During the Double-blind Treatment PhaseWeek 52 [N=194, 193, 220]66.3 percent changeStandard Deviation 34.8
Adalimumab + MethotrexateNumeric American College of Rheumatology (ACR-N) During the Double-blind Treatment PhaseWeek 76 [N=181, 179, 211]68.8 percent changeStandard Deviation 31.3
Adalimumab + MethotrexateNumeric American College of Rheumatology (ACR-N) During the Double-blind Treatment PhaseWeek 26 [N=218, 224, 244]57.0 percent changeStandard Deviation 42.2

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 28, 2026