Skip to content

Effectiveness of Sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim in the Treatment of Chronic Otitis Media

Effectiveness of Sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim in the Treatment of Chronic Otitis Media

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00189098
Enrollment
101
Registered
2005-09-16
Start date
2003-02-28
Completion date
2006-11-30
Last updated
2012-07-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Otitis Media

Brief summary

Chronic suppurative otitis media is one of the most common chronic infections in children worldwide. Symptoms include otorrhea, otalgia and hearing loss. In many countries, it is treated primarily with antibiotics; in other countries such as the Netherlands a surgical approach, such as a tonsillectomy, adenoidectomy, placement or removal of tympanostomy tubes or a tympanomastoidectomy is preferred. There is however, no agreement on the management of this disease. The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness of treatment with sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim for 6-12 weeks in children suffering from chronic otitis media and otorrhea.

Detailed description

Chronic suppurative otitis media is one of the most common chronic infections in children worldwide. Symptoms include otorrhea, otalgia and hearing loss. In many countries it is treated primarily with antibiotics; in other countries such as the Netherlands a surgical approach, such as a tonsillectomy, adenoidectomy, placement or removal of tympanostomy tubes or a tympanomastoidectomy is preferred. There is however, no agreement on the management of this disease. Co-trimoxazole is an inexpensive antibiotic and tolerated well by children, also when long treatment regimens or prophylaxis is necessary. A previously performed retrospective study of 48 children who were referred to the pediatric department of otorhinolaryngology in the UMC Utrecht because of therapeutic resistant otorrhea showed promising results; after 3 months follow-up, 52% of the patients were otorrhea free, 25% had otorrhea incidentally and 23% showed no signs of improvement. Therefore, the treatment of chronic otitis media with sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim for a minimum of six weeks is promising and might be a good alternative to surgical treatment. The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness of treatment with sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim during 6-12 weeks in children with chronic otitis media and otorrhea for more than 12 weeks.

Interventions

18 mg/kg, two times a day

DRUGPlacebo

Sponsors

Dutch Health Care Insurance Board
CollaboratorOTHER
UMC Utrecht
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
1 Years to 12 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* age between 1 and 12 years * otorrhea for more than 3 months

Exclusion criteria

* cholesteatoma * known immune deficiency other than IgA or IgG2 * Down's syndrome * craniofacial anomalies * cystic fibrosis * immotile cilia syndrome * allergy to sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim * continuous use of sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim for more than six weeks in the past six months

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Otomicroscopic Signs of Otorrhea in Either Ear6, 12 weeks and 1 year follow-up.The primary endpoint was otomicroscopic signs of otorrhea in either ear in the presence of a tympanostomy tube or tympanic membrane perforation at 6 and 12 weeks and 1 year follow-up. At these follow-up moments the participants were checked for the presence of otorrhea using an otomicroscope.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Patients Who Used Additional Antibiotic Eardrops Between 6 to 12 Week Follow-upBetween 6 to12 week follow upParents kept a diary of study medication and additional medication used for their child's' ear disease, including eardrops. These data were collected at the follow-up visits.
Number of Patients Who Used Additional Antibiotic Eardrops Between 12 Weeks to 1 Year Follow-upbetween 12 weeks to 1 year follow-upParents kept a diary of study medication and additional medication used for their child's' ear disease, including eardrops. These data were collected at the follow-up visits.
Number of Patients Who Used Systemic Antibiotics Other Than the Study Medication Between 6 and 12 Weeks Follow-up.between 6 and 12 weeks follow-upParents kept a diary of study medication and additional medication used for their child's' ear disease, including additional use of systemic antibiotics other than the study medication. These data were collected at the follow-up visits.
Number of Patients Who Used Systemic Antibiotics Other Than the Study Medication Between 12 Weeks and 1 Year Follow-up.between 12 weeks and 1 year follow-upParents kept a diary of study medication and additional medication used for their child's' ear disease, including additional use of systemic antibiotics other than the study medication. These data were collected at the follow-up visits.
Number of Patients Who Underwent Ear Nose and Throat Surgery Between 12 Weeks and 1 Year Follow-up.between 12 weeks and 1 year follow-upAfter 12 weeks follow-up irrespective of the presence or absence of otorrhea the study medication was discontinued. After the first 12 weeks local otorhinolaryngologists and paediatricians were free to manage symptoms of otorrhea according to their regular practice. Parents kept a diary between 12 weeks and 1 year follow-up where Ear Nose and Throat Surgery was noted. This outcome describes the number of patients who underwent Ear Nose and Throat Surgery between 12 weeks and 1 year follow-up.

Countries

Netherlands

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Patients were recruited between February 2003 and June 2006. Otorhinolaryngologists and paediatricians from all over the Netherlands referred potential participants, i.e. children with COM that had failed conventional management with topical medications and/or short term systemic antibiotics

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
Children assigned to the placebo group received two times a day a placebo for 6 to 12 weeks. The placebo was a blinded suspension with an identical taste, bottle and fluid appearance as the sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim suspension. When at the first control visit after 6 weeks otorrhea was found to be present in either ear, the study medication was continued for another 6 weeks. The study medication was discontinued if both ears were found to be free from otorrhea and parents confirmed that they had seen no signs of otorrhea during the previous week. Parents were instructed to start the study medication again if symptoms of otorrhea recurred between the follow-up visits at 6 and 12 weeks. At inclusion and if otorrhea was present at 6 and 12 weeks follow-up, antibiotic with corticosteroid eardrops were prescribed in addition to the study medication for 7 to 10 days. After 12 weeks follow-up the study medication was discontinued irrespective of the presence or absence of otorrhea.
51
Sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim
Children assigned to the Sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim group received Sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim orally (18mg/kg two times a day) for 6 to 12 weeks. When at the first control visit after 6 weeks otorrhea was found to be present in either ear, the study medication was continued for another 6 weeks. The study medication was discontinued if both ears were found to be free from otorrhea and parents confirmed that they had seen no signs of otorrhea during the previous week. Parents were instructed to start the study medication again if symptoms of otorrhea recurred between the follow-up visits at 6 and 12 weeks. At inclusion and if otorrhea was present at 6 and 12 weeks follow-up, antibiotic with corticosteroid eardrops were prescribed in addition to the study medication for 7 to 10 days. After 12 weeks follow-up the study medication was discontinued irrespective of the presence or absence of otorrhea.
50
Total101

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlaceboSulfamethoxazole-trimethoprimTotal
Age Continuous51 months48 months50 months
Sex: Female, Male
Female
25 Participants22 Participants47 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
26 Participants28 Participants54 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
4 / 501 / 51
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 501 / 51

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With Otomicroscopic Signs of Otorrhea in Either Ear

The primary endpoint was otomicroscopic signs of otorrhea in either ear in the presence of a tympanostomy tube or tympanic membrane perforation at 6 and 12 weeks and 1 year follow-up. At these follow-up moments the participants were checked for the presence of otorrhea using an otomicroscope.

Time frame: 6, 12 weeks and 1 year follow-up.

Population: intention to treat

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprimNumber of Participants With Otomicroscopic Signs of Otorrhea in Either EarAt 6 weeks13 participants
Sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprimNumber of Participants With Otomicroscopic Signs of Otorrhea in Either EarAt 12 weeks15 participants
Sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprimNumber of Participants With Otomicroscopic Signs of Otorrhea in Either EarAt 12 months11 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Otomicroscopic Signs of Otorrhea in Either EarAt 6 weeks27 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Otomicroscopic Signs of Otorrhea in Either EarAt 12 weeks23 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Otomicroscopic Signs of Otorrhea in Either EarAt 12 months9 participants
Comparison: Assuming a spontaneous recovery of 25% and a treatment effect of TMP-SMX of 50% (based on a retrospective study of children treated with TMP-SMX for COM at our hospital), and taking α=0.05 and a power of 0.80, we calculated that each group should consist of 50 children.~Rate differences with 95% confidence intervals were calculated at the three control visits to compare both groups for the outcome measures.95% CI: [-44, -6]risk differences (RD)
Comparison: Assuming a spontaneous recovery of 25% and a treatment effect of TMP-SMX of 50% (based on a retrospective study of children treated with TMP-SMX for COM at our hospital), and taking α=0.05 and a power of 0.80, we calculated that each group should consist of 50 children.~Rate differences with 95% confidence intervals were calculated at the three control visits to compare both groups for the outcome measures.95% CI: [-34, 4]risk difference (RD)
Comparison: Assuming a spontaneous recovery of 25% and a treatment effect of TMP-SMX of 50% (based on a retrospective study of children treated with TMP-SMX for COM at our hospital), and taking α=0.05 and a power of 0.80, we calculated that each group should consist of 50 children.~Rate differences with 95% confidence intervals were calculated at the three control visits to compare both groups for the outcome measures.95% CI: [-12, 22]risk difference (RD)
Secondary

Number of Patients Who Underwent Ear Nose and Throat Surgery Between 12 Weeks and 1 Year Follow-up.

After 12 weeks follow-up irrespective of the presence or absence of otorrhea the study medication was discontinued. After the first 12 weeks local otorhinolaryngologists and paediatricians were free to manage symptoms of otorrhea according to their regular practice. Parents kept a diary between 12 weeks and 1 year follow-up where Ear Nose and Throat Surgery was noted. This outcome describes the number of patients who underwent Ear Nose and Throat Surgery between 12 weeks and 1 year follow-up.

Time frame: between 12 weeks and 1 year follow-up

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprimNumber of Patients Who Underwent Ear Nose and Throat Surgery Between 12 Weeks and 1 Year Follow-up.13 participants
PlaceboNumber of Patients Who Underwent Ear Nose and Throat Surgery Between 12 Weeks and 1 Year Follow-up.11 participants
95% CI: [-12, 24]Rate differences (95%CI intervals)
Secondary

Number of Patients Who Used Additional Antibiotic Eardrops Between 12 Weeks to 1 Year Follow-up

Parents kept a diary of study medication and additional medication used for their child's' ear disease, including eardrops. These data were collected at the follow-up visits.

Time frame: between 12 weeks to 1 year follow-up

Population: Parents kept a diary of study medication and additional medication used for their child's' ear disease, including eardrops. These data were collected at the follow-up visits. Some parents did not fill in the required forms and these were excluded in this analysis. Therefore number of participants analyzed differ from the flow-chart.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprimNumber of Patients Who Used Additional Antibiotic Eardrops Between 12 Weeks to 1 Year Follow-up29 participants
PlaceboNumber of Patients Who Used Additional Antibiotic Eardrops Between 12 Weeks to 1 Year Follow-up31 participants
95% CI: [-22, 14]rate difference (RD)
Secondary

Number of Patients Who Used Additional Antibiotic Eardrops Between 6 to 12 Week Follow-up

Parents kept a diary of study medication and additional medication used for their child's' ear disease, including eardrops. These data were collected at the follow-up visits.

Time frame: Between 6 to12 week follow up

Population: Parents kept a diary of study medication and additional medication used for their child's' ear disease, including eardrops. These data were collected at the follow-up visits. Some parents did not fill in the required forms and these were excluded in this analysis. Therefore number of participants analyzed differ from the flow-chart.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprimNumber of Patients Who Used Additional Antibiotic Eardrops Between 6 to 12 Week Follow-up21 participants
PlaceboNumber of Patients Who Used Additional Antibiotic Eardrops Between 6 to 12 Week Follow-up26 participants
95% CI: [-34, 10]rate differences (95%CI intervals)
Secondary

Number of Patients Who Used Systemic Antibiotics Other Than the Study Medication Between 12 Weeks and 1 Year Follow-up.

Parents kept a diary of study medication and additional medication used for their child's' ear disease, including additional use of systemic antibiotics other than the study medication. These data were collected at the follow-up visits.

Time frame: between 12 weeks and 1 year follow-up

Population: Parents kept a diary of study medication and additional medication used for their child's' ear disease, including additional use of systemic antibiotics other than the study medication. These data were collected at the follow-up visits. Some parents did not fill in the required forms and these were excluded in this analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprimNumber of Patients Who Used Systemic Antibiotics Other Than the Study Medication Between 12 Weeks and 1 Year Follow-up.23 participants
PlaceboNumber of Patients Who Used Systemic Antibiotics Other Than the Study Medication Between 12 Weeks and 1 Year Follow-up.18 participants
95% CI: [-7, 37]Rate difference (RD)
Secondary

Number of Patients Who Used Systemic Antibiotics Other Than the Study Medication Between 6 and 12 Weeks Follow-up.

Parents kept a diary of study medication and additional medication used for their child's' ear disease, including additional use of systemic antibiotics other than the study medication. These data were collected at the follow-up visits.

Time frame: between 6 and 12 weeks follow-up

Population: Parents kept a diary of study medication and additional medication used for their child's' ear disease, including additional use of systemic antibiotics other than the study medication. These data were collected at the follow-up visits. Some parents did not fill in the required forms and these were excluded in this analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprimNumber of Patients Who Used Systemic Antibiotics Other Than the Study Medication Between 6 and 12 Weeks Follow-up.4 participants
PlaceboNumber of Patients Who Used Systemic Antibiotics Other Than the Study Medication Between 6 and 12 Weeks Follow-up.7 participants
95% CI: [-23, 9]Rate differences (95%CI interval)

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 3, 2026