Skip to content

Efavirenz or Atazanavir/Ritonavir Given With Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate or Abacavir/Lamivudine in HIV Infected Treatment-Naive Adults

A Phase IIIB, Randomized Trial of Open-Label Efavirenz or Atazanavir With Ritonavir in Combination With Double-Blind Comparison of Emtricitabine/Tenofovir or Abacavir/Lamivudine in Antiretroviral-Naive Subjects

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00118898
Enrollment
1864
Registered
2005-07-12
Start date
2005-09-30
Completion date
2009-11-30
Last updated
2018-10-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

HIV Infections

Keywords

Treatment Naive

Brief summary

Currently, the preferred anti-HIV regimens used in the United States consist of two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) and the nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) efavirenz (EFV). However, with new anti-HIV drugs being approved, alternative regimens need to be tested to determine if new drug combinations have increased effectiveness in treating HIV. The purpose of this study is to test the safety, tolerability, and effectiveness of four different regimens in HIV-infected adults who have never taken anti-HIV drugs.

Detailed description

Antiretroviral (ARV) treatment regimens consisting of EFV and two NRTIs are the most commonly prescribed regimens for the initial therapy of HIV-infected people in the United States. Such regimens are popular because the drugs are easy to administer, have overall excellent efficacy, and are well tolerated. However, because of concerns about long-term drug toxicity, the development of drug resistance, and potential complications in pregnant women, it is imperative that other drug combinations be investigated as possible alternative initial regimens. Drugs recently approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for HIV treatment include the protease inhibitor (PI) atazanavir (ATV) and the two NRTI coformulations emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (FTC/TDF) and abacavir/lamivudine (ABC/3TC). Data are limited on the efficacy of these new drugs when part of anti-HIV drug regimens. This study will evaluate and compare the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of four different treatment regimens in HIV-infected treatment-naive adults. The treatment portion of this study will last 96 weeks after the last participant is enrolled. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of four arms: * Arm 1 participants will receive EFV, FTC/TDF, and placebo for ABC/3TC. * Arm 2 participants will receive EFV, ABC/3TC, and placebo for FTC/TDF. * Arm 3 participants will receive ritonavir (RTV)-boosted ATV, FTC/TDF, and placebo for ABC/3TC. * Arm 4 participants will receive RTV-boosted ATV, ABC/3TC and placebo for FTC/TDF. NOTE: Lopinavir/ritonavir may be used in substitution of other drugs for certain participants. Study visits will occur at study entry; Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, and 24; and every 12 weeks thereafter. A physical exam, blood collection, and urine collection will occur at most visits. Two pharmacokinetic blood samples will be collected from participants between Weeks 4 and 24. Participants will undergo adherence training at study entry and will be asked to complete adherence questionnaires at selected study visits. Some participants will be asked to participate in ACTG A5224s, a metabolic substudy of ACTG A5202. The Data Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) for A5202 met in January 2008 to review the study. After reviewing the study information, the DSMB noted that certain study regimens were significantly less effective than others. Specifically, ABC/3TC-containing regimens were not as effective in controlling the virus as TDF/FTC-containing regimens for participants entering the study with high viral loads. The DSMB also commented that participants assigned to ABC/3TC had a shorter time until they experienced side effects than participants assigned to TDF/FTC. The DSMB had no safety concerns for the other drug comparisons. Based on DSMB review, in Feb 2008 participants who started the study with high viral loads were told whether they were taking ABC/3TC or TDF/FTC and offered the option to continue or change their NRTI study drug component, after discussion with their doctor. For participants who started the study with lower screening viral loads, study treatment continued without change. For 74 participant the reason for first treatment modification was unblinded and switched as a consequence of the DSMB results (33 on EFV, ABC/3TC, and placebo FTC/TDF arm; 1 on RTV-boosted ATV, FTC/TDF, and placebo ABC/3TC arm; and 40 on RTV-boosted ATV, ABC/3TC, and placebo FTC/TDF arm).

Interventions

600 mg abacavir/300 mg lamivudine tablet taken orally daily

DRUGAtazanavir

300 mg tablet taken orally daily

DRUGEfavirenz

600 mg tablet taken orally daily

DRUGEmtricitabine/Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate

200 mg emtricitabine/300 mg tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablet taken orally daily

DRUGRitonavir

100 mg tablet taken orally daily

Placebo tablet taken orally daily

Placebo tablet taken orally daily

Sponsors

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
CollaboratorNIH
Advancing Clinical Therapeutics Globally for HIV/AIDS and Other Infections
Lead SponsorNETWORK

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
16 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* HIV-infected. A resistance assay must be obtained if the participant has evidence of recent infection. More information on this criterion can be found in the protocol. * Antiretroviral naive, defined as 7 days or less of ARV treatment at any time prior to study entry. Participants who have received ARVs as part of postexposure prophylaxis or who have received an investigational drug that was not an NRTI, NNRTI, or PI are eligible for this study. * HIV viral load greater than 1,000 copies/ml within 90 days prior to study entry * Certain laboratory values obtained within 30 days prior to study entry. More information on this criterion can be found in the protocol * Willing to use acceptable forms of contraception * Parent or guardian able and willing to provide written informed consent, if applicable * Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) negative at study entry

Exclusion criteria

* Immunomodulators (e.g., interleukins, interferons, cyclosporine), HIV vaccine, systemic cytotoxic chemotherapy, or investigational therapy within 30 days prior to study entry. Individuals receiving either stable physiologic glucocorticoid doses, corticosteroids for acute therapy for pneumocystis pneumonia, or a short course (2 weeks or less) of pharmacologic glucocorticoid therapy will not be excluded. * Known allergy/sensitivity to study drugs or their formulations * Active alcohol or drug use that, in the opinion of the investigator, would interfere with adherence to study requirements * Serious illness requiring systemic treatment or hospitalization. Patients who have completed therapy or are clinically stable on therapy for at least 7 days prior to study entry are not excluded. * Known clinically relevant cardiac conduction system disease * Requirement for any current medications that are prohibited with any study treatment. * Evidence of any major drug resistance-associated mutation on any genotype or evidence of significant resistance on any phenotype performed at any time prior to study entry. * Current imprisonment or involuntary incarceration for psychiatric or physical (e.g., infectious disease) illness * Breastfeeding. Women who become pregnant during the study will be unblinded and required to permanently discontinue their study regimens.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time From Randomization to Virologic FailureFollow-up time was variable,median follow-up was 138 weeks; see 'Amount of study follow-up' outcome for detailsBlood samples for determining virologic failure were obtained at visit weeks 16 and 24 , and every 12 weeks thereafter. Virologic failure was defined as a confirmed plasma HIV-1 RNA level \>= 1000 copies/mL at or after 16 weeks after randomization and before 24 weeks, or \>=200 copies/mL at or after 24 weeks. The 5th percentile for time to virologic failure is the time (in weeks) at which 5% of the participants have experienced virologic failure.
Time From Treatment Dispensation to Treatment ModificationFollow-up time was variable,median follow-up was 138 weeks; see 'Amount of study follow-up' outcome for detailsTreatment modification is defined as the 1st modification of the regimen, including a permanent discontinuation, switch, or substitution.
Time From Treatment Dispensation to a Grade 3/4 Safety EventAll follow-up while on initially assigned regimen; the median (25th, 75th percentile) follow-up while on initial regimen was 120 (54, 156) weeks and the range was 0 to 205 weeks.Grade 3/4 safety event is defined as a grade 3 or 4 sign, symptom, or laboratory abnormality that is at least one grade higher than at baseline, total bilirubin and creatine kinase (CPK) were excluded. Grading used the Division of AIDS (DAIDS) 2004 Severity of Adverse Events Tables.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With HIV-1 RNA Levels Less Than 200 Copies/mLAt Weeks 48 and 96
Time From Treatment Dispensation to Regimen Failure (First Occurrence of Virologic Failure or Treatment Modification)Follow-up time was variable,median follow-up was 138 weeks; see 'Amount of study follow-up' outcome for detailsBlood samples for determining virologic failure were obtained at 16 and 24 weeks, and every 12 weeks thereafter. Virologic failure was defined as a confirmed plasma HIV-1 RNA level \>= 1000 copies/mL at or after 16 weeks and before 24 weeks or \>=200 copies/mL at or after 24 weeks. Treatment modification was defined as the 1st modification of the regimen, including a permanent discontinuation, switch, or substitution.
The Number of Participants With HIV-1 RNA Levels Less Than 50 Copies/mLAt Weeks 48 and 96
Change in CD4 Count (Cells/mm3) From BaselineAt Weeks 48 and 96Change was calculated as the CD4 count at Week 48 (or at Week 96) minus the baseline CD4 count (mean of pre-entry and entry values).
Number of Participants With Virologic Failure and Emergence of Major ResistanceFollow-up time was variable,median follow-up was 138 weeks; see 'Amount of study follow-up' outcome for detailsEmergence of resistant virus was assessed by genotypic testing performed at Stanford University for all participants who met criteria for virologic failure and retrospectively on baseline samples from these participants. Major mutations were defined by International AIDS Society-United States of America (2008), as well as T69D, L74I, G190C/E/Q/T/V for reverse transcriptase and L24I, F53L, I54V/A/T/S, G73C/S/T/A, N88D for protease.
Number of Participants Experiencing Certain Targeted Clinical Events, Including Death, AIDS-defining Illness, and HIV-1 Related Events.Follow-up time was variable, median follow-up was 138 weeks; see 'Amount of study follow-up' outcome for detailsAIDS-defining illnesses were defined per CDC category C definition. HIV-1 related events were defined per CDC category B definition. Events underwent study chair review for classification. See link below for more details. http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/00018871.htm
Change in Fasting Total Cholesterol Level From BaselineAt Weeks 48 and 96Only fasting results are included. The protocol did not require that samples be collected fasting.
Change in Fasting High-density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol Level From BaselineAt Weeks 48 and 96Only fasting results are included. The protocol did not require that samples be collected fasting.
Change in Fasting Non-high Density Lipoprotein (Non-HDL) Cholesterol Level From BaselineAt Weeks 48 and 96Only fasting results are included. The protocol did not require that samples be collected fasting.
Change in Fasting Triglyceride Level From BaselineAt Weeks 48 and 96Only fasting results are included. The protocol did not require that samples be collected fasting.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cumulative Probability of Not Experiencing a Grade 3/4 Safety EventAt week 48 and 96Kaplan-Meier estimate of the cumulative survival probability at week 48 and 96. Grade 3/4 safety event is defined as a grade 3 or 4 sign, symptom, or laboratory abnormality that is at least one grade higher than at baseline, total bilirubin and creatine kinase (CPK) were excluded. Grading used the Division of AIDS (DAIDS) 2004 Severity of Adverse Events Tables. As-treated analysis censored at 1st modification of initially assigned regimen, participants who never started treatment were excluded.
Number of Participants With Treatment ModificationFollow-up time was variable, median follow-up was 138 weeks; see 'Amount of study follow-up' outcome for detailsTreatment modification is defined as the 1st modification of the regimen, including a permanent discontinuation, switch, or substitution.
Cumulative Probability of Not Experiencing Treatment ModificationAt week 48 and 96Kaplan-Meier estimate of the cumulative survival probability at week 48 and 96. Treatment modification is defined as the 1st modification of the regimen, including a permanent discontinuation, switch, or substitution.
Number of Participants With Regimen FailureFollow-up time was variable, median follow-up was 138 weeks; see 'Amount of study follow-up' outcome for detailsBlood samples for determining virologic failure were obtained at 16 and 24 weeks, and every 12 weeks thereafter. Virologic failure was defined as a confirmed plasma HIV-1 RNA level \>= 1000 copies/mL at or after 16 weeks and before 24 weeks or \>=200 copies/mL at or after 24 weeks. Treatment modification was defined as the 1st modification of the regimen, including a permanent discontinuation, switch, or substitution.
Cumulative Probability of Not Experiencing Regimen FailureAt week 48 and 96Kaplan-Meier estimate of the cumulative survival probability at week 48 and 96. Blood samples for determining virologic failure were obtained at 16 and 24 weeks, and every 12 weeks thereafter. Virologic failure was defined as a confirmed plasma HIV-1 RNA level \>= 1000 copies/mL at or after 16 weeks and before 24 weeks or \>=200 copies/mL at or after 24 weeks. Treatment modification was defined as the 1st modification of the regimen, including a permanent discontinuation, switch, or substitution.
Number of Participants With a Grade 3/4 Safety EventOver all study follow-up while on initially assigned treatment, median follow-up was 120 weeksGrade 3/4 safety event is defined as a grade 3 or 4 sign, symptom, or laboratory abnormality that is at least one grade higher than at baseline, total bilirubin and creatine kinase (CPK) were excluded. Grading used the Division of AIDS (DAIDS) 2004 Severity of Adverse Events Tables. As-treated analysis censored at 1st modification of initially assigned regimen, participants who never started treatment were excluded.
Cumulative Probability of Not Experiencing Virologic FailureAt week 48 and 96Kaplan-Meier estimate of the cumulative survival probability at week 48 and 96. Blood samples for determining virologic failure were obtained at 16 and 24 weeks, and every 12 weeks thereafter. Virologic failure was defined as a confirmed plasma HIV-1 RNA level \>= 1000 copies/mL at or after 16 weeks and before 24 weeks or \>=200 copies/mL at or after 24 weeks.
Amount of Study Follow-upFollow-up time was variable, median follow-up was 138 weeksParticipants were to be followed for 96 weeks after the last enrollment. Accrual was expected to take 96 weeks, thus the planned follow-up time was 96 to 192 weeks, dependent on when in the study the participant enrolled. This outcome summarizes that total amount of actual follow-up in weeks from randomization to last contact.
Number of Participants With Virologic FailureFollow-up time was variable, median follow-up was 138 weeks; see 'Amount of study follow-up' outcome for detailsBlood samples for determining virologic failure were obtained at 16 and 24 weeks, and every 12 weeks thereafter. Virologic failure was defined as a confirmed plasma HIV-1 RNA level \>= 1000 copies/mL at or after 16 weeks and before 24 weeks or \>=200 copies/mL at or after 24 weeks.

Countries

Puerto Rico, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Recruited at AIDS Clinical Trials Units in the United States and Puerto Rico. Recruitment occurred between September 21, 2005 (date first subject was randomized) and November 20, 2007 (date last subject was randomized).

Pre-assignment details

1864 were randomized. Results reported for 1857 eligible participants; 7 were subsequently found ineligible and excluded from all analyses.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
EFV, FTC/TDF, and Placebo ABC/3TC
Participants will receive EFV, FTC/TDF, and placebo for ABC/3TC for at least 96 weeks
464
EFV, Placebo FTC/TDF, and ABC/3TC
Participants will receive EFV, placebo for FTC/TDF, and ABC/3TC for at least 96 weeks
465
RTV-boosted ATV, FTC/TDF, and Placebo ABC/3TC
Participants will receive RTV-boosted ATV, FTC/TDF, and placebo for ABC/3TC for at least 96 weeks
465
RTV-boosted ATV, Placebo FTC/TDF, and ABC/3TC
Participants will receive RTV-boosted ATV, placebo for FTC/TDF, and ABC/3TC for at least 96 weeks
463
Total1,857

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Overall StudyDeath61168
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up26343333
Overall StudyNot able to get to clinic34433140
Overall StudyNot compliant with requirements11131111
Overall StudySevere debilitation1464
Overall StudySite Closure33312837
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject10588

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicEFV, FTC/TDF, and Placebo ABC/3TCRTV-boosted ATV, FTC/TDF, and Placebo ABC/3TCEFV, Placebo FTC/TDF, and ABC/3TCRTV-boosted ATV, Placebo FTC/TDF, and ABC/3TCTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
2 Participants2 Participants3 Participants3 Participants10 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
1 Participants2 Participants8 Participants2 Participants13 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
461 Participants461 Participants454 Participants458 Participants1834 Participants
Age, Continuous38.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.6
38.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.4
38.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.5
38.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.8
38.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.1
Baseline CD4+ count233.5 cells/mm3224 cells/mm3225 cells/mm3236 cells/mm3229.5 cells/mm3
Baseline HIV-1 RNA4.7 log10 copies/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.7
4.7 log10 copies/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.7
4.7 log10 copies/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.7
4.7 log10 copies/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.7
4.7 log10 copies/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.7
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian, Pacific Islander
5 participants12 participants8 participants7 participants32 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black Non-Hispanic
151 participants147 participants164 participants153 participants615 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic (Regardless of Race)
104 participants111 participants106 participants108 participants429 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
More than One Race
2 participants5 participants5 participants4 participants16 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native American, Alaskan Native
4 participants3 participants5 participants2 participants14 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Unknown
1 participants1 participants3 participants0 participants5 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White Non-Hispanic
197 participants186 participants174 participants189 participants746 participants
Region of Enrollment
Puerto Rico
13 participants13 participants13 participants13 participants52 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
451 participants452 participants452 participants450 participants1805 participants
Screening HIV-1 RNA
<100,000 copies/mL
265 participants265 participants266 participants264 participants1060 participants
Screening HIV-1 RNA
>=100,000 copies/mL
199 participants200 participants199 participants199 participants797 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
71 Participants78 Participants98 Participants75 Participants322 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
393 Participants387 Participants367 Participants388 Participants1535 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
434 / 461433 / 461453 / 464461 / 462
serious
Total, serious adverse events
48 / 46162 / 46158 / 46471 / 462

Outcome results

Primary

Time From Randomization to Virologic Failure

Blood samples for determining virologic failure were obtained at visit weeks 16 and 24 , and every 12 weeks thereafter. Virologic failure was defined as a confirmed plasma HIV-1 RNA level \>= 1000 copies/mL at or after 16 weeks after randomization and before 24 weeks, or \>=200 copies/mL at or after 24 weeks. The 5th percentile for time to virologic failure is the time (in weeks) at which 5% of the participants have experienced virologic failure.

Time frame: Follow-up time was variable,median follow-up was 138 weeks; see 'Amount of study follow-up' outcome for details

Population: Intention to treat: All eligible participants were included in the analysis, participants were analyzed per originally assigned regimen.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
EFV, FTC/TDF, and Placebo ABC/3TCTime From Randomization to Virologic Failure5th percentile time to virologic failure36 Weeks
EFV, FTC/TDF, and Placebo ABC/3TCTime From Randomization to Virologic Failure10th percentile time to virologic failure96 Weeks
EFV, Placebo FTC/TDF, and ABC/3TCTime From Randomization to Virologic Failure10th percentile time to virologic failure36 Weeks
EFV, Placebo FTC/TDF, and ABC/3TCTime From Randomization to Virologic Failure5th percentile time to virologic failure24 Weeks
RTV-boosted ATV, FTC/TDF, and Placebo ABC/3TCTime From Randomization to Virologic Failure5th percentile time to virologic failure24 Weeks
RTV-boosted ATV, FTC/TDF, and Placebo ABC/3TCTime From Randomization to Virologic Failure10th percentile time to virologic failure84 Weeks
RTV-boosted ATV, Placebo FTC/TDF, and ABC/3TCTime From Randomization to Virologic Failure5th percentile time to virologic failure24 Weeks
RTV-boosted ATV, Placebo FTC/TDF, and ABC/3TCTime From Randomization to Virologic Failure10th percentile time to virologic failure36 Weeks
Primary

Time From Treatment Dispensation to a Grade 3/4 Safety Event

Grade 3/4 safety event is defined as a grade 3 or 4 sign, symptom, or laboratory abnormality that is at least one grade higher than at baseline, total bilirubin and creatine kinase (CPK) were excluded. Grading used the Division of AIDS (DAIDS) 2004 Severity of Adverse Events Tables.

Time frame: All follow-up while on initially assigned regimen; the median (25th, 75th percentile) follow-up while on initial regimen was 120 (54, 156) weeks and the range was 0 to 205 weeks.

Population: As-treated: Participants who initiated treatment are included in this analysis. Follow-up while on initially assigned treatment is included in the at-risk period.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
EFV, FTC/TDF, and Placebo ABC/3TCTime From Treatment Dispensation to a Grade 3/4 Safety Event5th percentile time to a grade 3/4 safety event2.6 Weeks
EFV, FTC/TDF, and Placebo ABC/3TCTime From Treatment Dispensation to a Grade 3/4 Safety Event25th percentile time to a grade 3/4 safety event59.3 Weeks
EFV, FTC/TDF, and Placebo ABC/3TCTime From Treatment Dispensation to a Grade 3/4 Safety Event10th percentile time to a grade 3/4 safety event7.9 Weeks
EFV, Placebo FTC/TDF, and ABC/3TCTime From Treatment Dispensation to a Grade 3/4 Safety Event5th percentile time to a grade 3/4 safety event1.3 Weeks
EFV, Placebo FTC/TDF, and ABC/3TCTime From Treatment Dispensation to a Grade 3/4 Safety Event25th percentile time to a grade 3/4 safety event16.0 Weeks
EFV, Placebo FTC/TDF, and ABC/3TCTime From Treatment Dispensation to a Grade 3/4 Safety Event10th percentile time to a grade 3/4 safety event2.0 Weeks
RTV-boosted ATV, FTC/TDF, and Placebo ABC/3TCTime From Treatment Dispensation to a Grade 3/4 Safety Event10th percentile time to a grade 3/4 safety event8.1 Weeks
RTV-boosted ATV, FTC/TDF, and Placebo ABC/3TCTime From Treatment Dispensation to a Grade 3/4 Safety Event5th percentile time to a grade 3/4 safety event3.0 Weeks
RTV-boosted ATV, FTC/TDF, and Placebo ABC/3TCTime From Treatment Dispensation to a Grade 3/4 Safety Event25th percentile time to a grade 3/4 safety event81.4 Weeks
RTV-boosted ATV, Placebo FTC/TDF, and ABC/3TCTime From Treatment Dispensation to a Grade 3/4 Safety Event5th percentile time to a grade 3/4 safety event1.3 Weeks
RTV-boosted ATV, Placebo FTC/TDF, and ABC/3TCTime From Treatment Dispensation to a Grade 3/4 Safety Event25th percentile time to a grade 3/4 safety event44.4 Weeks
RTV-boosted ATV, Placebo FTC/TDF, and ABC/3TCTime From Treatment Dispensation to a Grade 3/4 Safety Event10th percentile time to a grade 3/4 safety event3.9 Weeks
Primary

Time From Treatment Dispensation to Treatment Modification

Treatment modification is defined as the 1st modification of the regimen, including a permanent discontinuation, switch, or substitution.

Time frame: Follow-up time was variable,median follow-up was 138 weeks; see 'Amount of study follow-up' outcome for details

Population: Participants who initiated treatment are included in this analysis. Participants were analyzed per originally assigned regimen.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
EFV, FTC/TDF, and Placebo ABC/3TCTime From Treatment Dispensation to Treatment Modification5th percentile time to treatment modification3.4 Weeks
EFV, FTC/TDF, and Placebo ABC/3TCTime From Treatment Dispensation to Treatment Modification25th percentile time to treatment modification83.7 Weeks
EFV, FTC/TDF, and Placebo ABC/3TCTime From Treatment Dispensation to Treatment Modification10th percentile time to treatment modification15.0 Weeks
EFV, Placebo FTC/TDF, and ABC/3TCTime From Treatment Dispensation to Treatment Modification5th percentile time to treatment modification1.4 Weeks
EFV, Placebo FTC/TDF, and ABC/3TCTime From Treatment Dispensation to Treatment Modification25th percentile time to treatment modification27.4 Weeks
EFV, Placebo FTC/TDF, and ABC/3TCTime From Treatment Dispensation to Treatment Modification10th percentile time to treatment modification2.1 Weeks
RTV-boosted ATV, FTC/TDF, and Placebo ABC/3TCTime From Treatment Dispensation to Treatment Modification10th percentile time to treatment modification24.9 Weeks
RTV-boosted ATV, FTC/TDF, and Placebo ABC/3TCTime From Treatment Dispensation to Treatment Modification5th percentile time to treatment modification7.9 Weeks
RTV-boosted ATV, FTC/TDF, and Placebo ABC/3TCTime From Treatment Dispensation to Treatment Modification25th percentile time to treatment modification108.9 Weeks
RTV-boosted ATV, Placebo FTC/TDF, and ABC/3TCTime From Treatment Dispensation to Treatment Modification5th percentile time to treatment modification1.6 Weeks
RTV-boosted ATV, Placebo FTC/TDF, and ABC/3TCTime From Treatment Dispensation to Treatment Modification25th percentile time to treatment modification43.6 Weeks
RTV-boosted ATV, Placebo FTC/TDF, and ABC/3TCTime From Treatment Dispensation to Treatment Modification10th percentile time to treatment modification5.0 Weeks
Secondary

Change in CD4 Count (Cells/mm3) From Baseline

Change was calculated as the CD4 count at Week 48 (or at Week 96) minus the baseline CD4 count (mean of pre-entry and entry values).

Time frame: At Weeks 48 and 96

Population: Intention to treat: All participants with CD4 data were included, complete-case approach.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
EFV, FTC/TDF, and Placebo ABC/3TCChange in CD4 Count (Cells/mm3) From BaselineWeek 48163 Cells/mm3
EFV, FTC/TDF, and Placebo ABC/3TCChange in CD4 Count (Cells/mm3) From BaselineWeek 96220.5 Cells/mm3
EFV, Placebo FTC/TDF, and ABC/3TCChange in CD4 Count (Cells/mm3) From BaselineWeek 96250.5 Cells/mm3
EFV, Placebo FTC/TDF, and ABC/3TCChange in CD4 Count (Cells/mm3) From BaselineWeek 48188 Cells/mm3
RTV-boosted ATV, FTC/TDF, and Placebo ABC/3TCChange in CD4 Count (Cells/mm3) From BaselineWeek 48175 Cells/mm3
RTV-boosted ATV, FTC/TDF, and Placebo ABC/3TCChange in CD4 Count (Cells/mm3) From BaselineWeek 96251.5 Cells/mm3
RTV-boosted ATV, Placebo FTC/TDF, and ABC/3TCChange in CD4 Count (Cells/mm3) From BaselineWeek 48177.5 Cells/mm3
RTV-boosted ATV, Placebo FTC/TDF, and ABC/3TCChange in CD4 Count (Cells/mm3) From BaselineWeek 96250.3 Cells/mm3
Secondary

Change in Fasting High-density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol Level From Baseline

Only fasting results are included. The protocol did not require that samples be collected fasting.

Time frame: At Weeks 48 and 96

Population: Intention to treat: All participants with fasting lipids data were included, complete-case approach.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
EFV, FTC/TDF, and Placebo ABC/3TCChange in Fasting High-density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol Level From BaselineWeek 488 mg/dL
EFV, FTC/TDF, and Placebo ABC/3TCChange in Fasting High-density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol Level From BaselineWeek 969 mg/dL
EFV, Placebo FTC/TDF, and ABC/3TCChange in Fasting High-density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol Level From BaselineWeek 9611 mg/dL
EFV, Placebo FTC/TDF, and ABC/3TCChange in Fasting High-density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol Level From BaselineWeek 4810 mg/dL
RTV-boosted ATV, FTC/TDF, and Placebo ABC/3TCChange in Fasting High-density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol Level From BaselineWeek 485 mg/dL
RTV-boosted ATV, FTC/TDF, and Placebo ABC/3TCChange in Fasting High-density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol Level From BaselineWeek 964 mg/dL
RTV-boosted ATV, Placebo FTC/TDF, and ABC/3TCChange in Fasting High-density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol Level From BaselineWeek 488 mg/dL
RTV-boosted ATV, Placebo FTC/TDF, and ABC/3TCChange in Fasting High-density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol Level From BaselineWeek 967 mg/dL
Secondary

Change in Fasting Non-high Density Lipoprotein (Non-HDL) Cholesterol Level From Baseline

Only fasting results are included. The protocol did not require that samples be collected fasting.

Time frame: At Weeks 48 and 96

Population: Intention to treat: All participants with fasting lipids data were included, complete-case approach.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
EFV, FTC/TDF, and Placebo ABC/3TCChange in Fasting Non-high Density Lipoprotein (Non-HDL) Cholesterol Level From BaselineWeek 4814 mg/dL
EFV, FTC/TDF, and Placebo ABC/3TCChange in Fasting Non-high Density Lipoprotein (Non-HDL) Cholesterol Level From BaselineWeek 9613.5 mg/dL
EFV, Placebo FTC/TDF, and ABC/3TCChange in Fasting Non-high Density Lipoprotein (Non-HDL) Cholesterol Level From BaselineWeek 9618 mg/dL
EFV, Placebo FTC/TDF, and ABC/3TCChange in Fasting Non-high Density Lipoprotein (Non-HDL) Cholesterol Level From BaselineWeek 4823 mg/dL
RTV-boosted ATV, FTC/TDF, and Placebo ABC/3TCChange in Fasting Non-high Density Lipoprotein (Non-HDL) Cholesterol Level From BaselineWeek 9610 mg/dL
RTV-boosted ATV, FTC/TDF, and Placebo ABC/3TCChange in Fasting Non-high Density Lipoprotein (Non-HDL) Cholesterol Level From BaselineWeek 488 mg/dL
RTV-boosted ATV, Placebo FTC/TDF, and ABC/3TCChange in Fasting Non-high Density Lipoprotein (Non-HDL) Cholesterol Level From BaselineWeek 9618 mg/dL
RTV-boosted ATV, Placebo FTC/TDF, and ABC/3TCChange in Fasting Non-high Density Lipoprotein (Non-HDL) Cholesterol Level From BaselineWeek 4820 mg/dL
Secondary

Change in Fasting Total Cholesterol Level From Baseline

Only fasting results are included. The protocol did not require that samples be collected fasting.

Time frame: At Weeks 48 and 96

Population: Intention to treat: All participants with fasting lipids data were included, complete-case approach.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
EFV, FTC/TDF, and Placebo ABC/3TCChange in Fasting Total Cholesterol Level From BaselineWeek 4822 mg/dL
EFV, FTC/TDF, and Placebo ABC/3TCChange in Fasting Total Cholesterol Level From BaselineWeek 9623 mg/dL
EFV, Placebo FTC/TDF, and ABC/3TCChange in Fasting Total Cholesterol Level From BaselineWeek 9633 mg/dL
EFV, Placebo FTC/TDF, and ABC/3TCChange in Fasting Total Cholesterol Level From BaselineWeek 4835 mg/dL
RTV-boosted ATV, FTC/TDF, and Placebo ABC/3TCChange in Fasting Total Cholesterol Level From BaselineWeek 4811 mg/dL
RTV-boosted ATV, FTC/TDF, and Placebo ABC/3TCChange in Fasting Total Cholesterol Level From BaselineWeek 9614 mg/dL
RTV-boosted ATV, Placebo FTC/TDF, and ABC/3TCChange in Fasting Total Cholesterol Level From BaselineWeek 4830 mg/dL
RTV-boosted ATV, Placebo FTC/TDF, and ABC/3TCChange in Fasting Total Cholesterol Level From BaselineWeek 9625 mg/dL
Secondary

Change in Fasting Triglyceride Level From Baseline

Only fasting results are included. The protocol did not require that samples be collected fasting.

Time frame: At Weeks 48 and 96

Population: Intention to treat: All participants with fasting lipids data were included, complete-case approach.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
EFV, FTC/TDF, and Placebo ABC/3TCChange in Fasting Triglyceride Level From BaselineWeek 4810 mg/dL
EFV, FTC/TDF, and Placebo ABC/3TCChange in Fasting Triglyceride Level From BaselineWeek 969 mg/dL
EFV, Placebo FTC/TDF, and ABC/3TCChange in Fasting Triglyceride Level From BaselineWeek 9614 mg/dL
EFV, Placebo FTC/TDF, and ABC/3TCChange in Fasting Triglyceride Level From BaselineWeek 4815 mg/dL
RTV-boosted ATV, FTC/TDF, and Placebo ABC/3TCChange in Fasting Triglyceride Level From BaselineWeek 4814 mg/dL
RTV-boosted ATV, FTC/TDF, and Placebo ABC/3TCChange in Fasting Triglyceride Level From BaselineWeek 9611 mg/dL
RTV-boosted ATV, Placebo FTC/TDF, and ABC/3TCChange in Fasting Triglyceride Level From BaselineWeek 4824 mg/dL
RTV-boosted ATV, Placebo FTC/TDF, and ABC/3TCChange in Fasting Triglyceride Level From BaselineWeek 9633 mg/dL
Secondary

Number of Participants Experiencing Certain Targeted Clinical Events, Including Death, AIDS-defining Illness, and HIV-1 Related Events.

AIDS-defining illnesses were defined per CDC category C definition. HIV-1 related events were defined per CDC category B definition. Events underwent study chair review for classification. See link below for more details. http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/00018871.htm

Time frame: Follow-up time was variable, median follow-up was 138 weeks; see 'Amount of study follow-up' outcome for details

Population: Intention to treat: All eligible participants were included in the analysis, participants were analyzed per originally assigned regimen.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
EFV, FTC/TDF, and Placebo ABC/3TCNumber of Participants Experiencing Certain Targeted Clinical Events, Including Death, AIDS-defining Illness, and HIV-1 Related Events.Death6 Participants
EFV, FTC/TDF, and Placebo ABC/3TCNumber of Participants Experiencing Certain Targeted Clinical Events, Including Death, AIDS-defining Illness, and HIV-1 Related Events.HIV-1 relatated event56 Participants
EFV, FTC/TDF, and Placebo ABC/3TCNumber of Participants Experiencing Certain Targeted Clinical Events, Including Death, AIDS-defining Illness, and HIV-1 Related Events.AIDS-defining illness14 Participants
EFV, Placebo FTC/TDF, and ABC/3TCNumber of Participants Experiencing Certain Targeted Clinical Events, Including Death, AIDS-defining Illness, and HIV-1 Related Events.Death11 Participants
EFV, Placebo FTC/TDF, and ABC/3TCNumber of Participants Experiencing Certain Targeted Clinical Events, Including Death, AIDS-defining Illness, and HIV-1 Related Events.HIV-1 relatated event61 Participants
EFV, Placebo FTC/TDF, and ABC/3TCNumber of Participants Experiencing Certain Targeted Clinical Events, Including Death, AIDS-defining Illness, and HIV-1 Related Events.AIDS-defining illness25 Participants
RTV-boosted ATV, FTC/TDF, and Placebo ABC/3TCNumber of Participants Experiencing Certain Targeted Clinical Events, Including Death, AIDS-defining Illness, and HIV-1 Related Events.AIDS-defining illness20 Participants
RTV-boosted ATV, FTC/TDF, and Placebo ABC/3TCNumber of Participants Experiencing Certain Targeted Clinical Events, Including Death, AIDS-defining Illness, and HIV-1 Related Events.Death6 Participants
RTV-boosted ATV, FTC/TDF, and Placebo ABC/3TCNumber of Participants Experiencing Certain Targeted Clinical Events, Including Death, AIDS-defining Illness, and HIV-1 Related Events.HIV-1 relatated event57 Participants
RTV-boosted ATV, Placebo FTC/TDF, and ABC/3TCNumber of Participants Experiencing Certain Targeted Clinical Events, Including Death, AIDS-defining Illness, and HIV-1 Related Events.Death8 Participants
RTV-boosted ATV, Placebo FTC/TDF, and ABC/3TCNumber of Participants Experiencing Certain Targeted Clinical Events, Including Death, AIDS-defining Illness, and HIV-1 Related Events.HIV-1 relatated event63 Participants
RTV-boosted ATV, Placebo FTC/TDF, and ABC/3TCNumber of Participants Experiencing Certain Targeted Clinical Events, Including Death, AIDS-defining Illness, and HIV-1 Related Events.AIDS-defining illness23 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With HIV-1 RNA Levels Less Than 200 Copies/mL

Time frame: At Weeks 48 and 96

Population: Intention to treat: All participants with RNA data were included, complete-case approach.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
EFV, FTC/TDF, and Placebo ABC/3TCNumber of Participants With HIV-1 RNA Levels Less Than 200 Copies/mLNumber of Participants with RNA data at Week 48415 Participants
EFV, FTC/TDF, and Placebo ABC/3TCNumber of Participants With HIV-1 RNA Levels Less Than 200 Copies/mLNumber with HIV-1 RNA <200 copies/ml at Week 48398 Participants
EFV, FTC/TDF, and Placebo ABC/3TCNumber of Participants With HIV-1 RNA Levels Less Than 200 Copies/mLNumber of Participants with RNA data at Week 96379 Participants
EFV, FTC/TDF, and Placebo ABC/3TCNumber of Participants With HIV-1 RNA Levels Less Than 200 Copies/mLNumber with HIV-1 RNA <200 copies/ml at Week 96362 Participants
EFV, Placebo FTC/TDF, and ABC/3TCNumber of Participants With HIV-1 RNA Levels Less Than 200 Copies/mLNumber with HIV-1 RNA <200 copies/ml at Week 96342 Participants
EFV, Placebo FTC/TDF, and ABC/3TCNumber of Participants With HIV-1 RNA Levels Less Than 200 Copies/mLNumber of Participants with RNA data at Week 96361 Participants
EFV, Placebo FTC/TDF, and ABC/3TCNumber of Participants With HIV-1 RNA Levels Less Than 200 Copies/mLNumber with HIV-1 RNA <200 copies/ml at Week 48377 Participants
EFV, Placebo FTC/TDF, and ABC/3TCNumber of Participants With HIV-1 RNA Levels Less Than 200 Copies/mLNumber of Participants with RNA data at Week 48400 Participants
RTV-boosted ATV, FTC/TDF, and Placebo ABC/3TCNumber of Participants With HIV-1 RNA Levels Less Than 200 Copies/mLNumber of Participants with RNA data at Week 96384 Participants
RTV-boosted ATV, FTC/TDF, and Placebo ABC/3TCNumber of Participants With HIV-1 RNA Levels Less Than 200 Copies/mLNumber with HIV-1 RNA <200 copies/ml at Week 96368 Participants
RTV-boosted ATV, FTC/TDF, and Placebo ABC/3TCNumber of Participants With HIV-1 RNA Levels Less Than 200 Copies/mLNumber with HIV-1 RNA <200 copies/ml at Week 48391 Participants
RTV-boosted ATV, FTC/TDF, and Placebo ABC/3TCNumber of Participants With HIV-1 RNA Levels Less Than 200 Copies/mLNumber of Participants with RNA data at Week 48416 Participants
RTV-boosted ATV, Placebo FTC/TDF, and ABC/3TCNumber of Participants With HIV-1 RNA Levels Less Than 200 Copies/mLNumber with HIV-1 RNA <200 copies/ml at Week 96346 Participants
RTV-boosted ATV, Placebo FTC/TDF, and ABC/3TCNumber of Participants With HIV-1 RNA Levels Less Than 200 Copies/mLNumber of Participants with RNA data at Week 48411 Participants
RTV-boosted ATV, Placebo FTC/TDF, and ABC/3TCNumber of Participants With HIV-1 RNA Levels Less Than 200 Copies/mLNumber with HIV-1 RNA <200 copies/ml at Week 48372 Participants
RTV-boosted ATV, Placebo FTC/TDF, and ABC/3TCNumber of Participants With HIV-1 RNA Levels Less Than 200 Copies/mLNumber of Participants with RNA data at Week 96374 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Virologic Failure and Emergence of Major Resistance

Emergence of resistant virus was assessed by genotypic testing performed at Stanford University for all participants who met criteria for virologic failure and retrospectively on baseline samples from these participants. Major mutations were defined by International AIDS Society-United States of America (2008), as well as T69D, L74I, G190C/E/Q/T/V for reverse transcriptase and L24I, F53L, I54V/A/T/S, G73C/S/T/A, N88D for protease.

Time frame: Follow-up time was variable,median follow-up was 138 weeks; see 'Amount of study follow-up' outcome for details

Population: Intention to treat: All eligible participants are included. Participants were analyzed per originally assigned regimen.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
EFV, FTC/TDF, and Placebo ABC/3TCNumber of Participants With Virologic Failure and Emergence of Major Resistance27 participants
EFV, Placebo FTC/TDF, and ABC/3TCNumber of Participants With Virologic Failure and Emergence of Major Resistance41 participants
RTV-boosted ATV, FTC/TDF, and Placebo ABC/3TCNumber of Participants With Virologic Failure and Emergence of Major Resistance5 participants
RTV-boosted ATV, Placebo FTC/TDF, and ABC/3TCNumber of Participants With Virologic Failure and Emergence of Major Resistance12 participants
Secondary

The Number of Participants With HIV-1 RNA Levels Less Than 50 Copies/mL

Time frame: At Weeks 48 and 96

Population: Intention to treat: All participants with RNA data were included, complete-case approach.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
EFV, FTC/TDF, and Placebo ABC/3TCThe Number of Participants With HIV-1 RNA Levels Less Than 50 Copies/mLNumber of Participants with RNA data at Week 48415 Participants
EFV, FTC/TDF, and Placebo ABC/3TCThe Number of Participants With HIV-1 RNA Levels Less Than 50 Copies/mLNumber with HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/ml at Week 48372 Participants
EFV, FTC/TDF, and Placebo ABC/3TCThe Number of Participants With HIV-1 RNA Levels Less Than 50 Copies/mLNumber of Participants with RNA data at Week 96379 Participants
EFV, FTC/TDF, and Placebo ABC/3TCThe Number of Participants With HIV-1 RNA Levels Less Than 50 Copies/mLNumber with HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/ml at Week 96345 Participants
EFV, Placebo FTC/TDF, and ABC/3TCThe Number of Participants With HIV-1 RNA Levels Less Than 50 Copies/mLNumber with HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/ml at Week 48346 Participants
EFV, Placebo FTC/TDF, and ABC/3TCThe Number of Participants With HIV-1 RNA Levels Less Than 50 Copies/mLNumber of Participants with RNA data at Week 96361 Participants
EFV, Placebo FTC/TDF, and ABC/3TCThe Number of Participants With HIV-1 RNA Levels Less Than 50 Copies/mLNumber with HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/ml at Week 96328 Participants
EFV, Placebo FTC/TDF, and ABC/3TCThe Number of Participants With HIV-1 RNA Levels Less Than 50 Copies/mLNumber of Participants with RNA data at Week 48400 Participants
RTV-boosted ATV, FTC/TDF, and Placebo ABC/3TCThe Number of Participants With HIV-1 RNA Levels Less Than 50 Copies/mLNumber of Participants with RNA data at Week 96384 Participants
RTV-boosted ATV, FTC/TDF, and Placebo ABC/3TCThe Number of Participants With HIV-1 RNA Levels Less Than 50 Copies/mLNumber with HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/ml at Week 48348 Participants
RTV-boosted ATV, FTC/TDF, and Placebo ABC/3TCThe Number of Participants With HIV-1 RNA Levels Less Than 50 Copies/mLNumber with HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/ml at Week 96345 Participants
RTV-boosted ATV, FTC/TDF, and Placebo ABC/3TCThe Number of Participants With HIV-1 RNA Levels Less Than 50 Copies/mLNumber of Participants with RNA data at Week 48416 Participants
RTV-boosted ATV, Placebo FTC/TDF, and ABC/3TCThe Number of Participants With HIV-1 RNA Levels Less Than 50 Copies/mLNumber with HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/ml at Week 96317 Participants
RTV-boosted ATV, Placebo FTC/TDF, and ABC/3TCThe Number of Participants With HIV-1 RNA Levels Less Than 50 Copies/mLNumber with HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/ml at Week 48322 Participants
RTV-boosted ATV, Placebo FTC/TDF, and ABC/3TCThe Number of Participants With HIV-1 RNA Levels Less Than 50 Copies/mLNumber of Participants with RNA data at Week 48411 Participants
RTV-boosted ATV, Placebo FTC/TDF, and ABC/3TCThe Number of Participants With HIV-1 RNA Levels Less Than 50 Copies/mLNumber of Participants with RNA data at Week 96374 Participants
Secondary

Time From Treatment Dispensation to Regimen Failure (First Occurrence of Virologic Failure or Treatment Modification)

Blood samples for determining virologic failure were obtained at 16 and 24 weeks, and every 12 weeks thereafter. Virologic failure was defined as a confirmed plasma HIV-1 RNA level \>= 1000 copies/mL at or after 16 weeks and before 24 weeks or \>=200 copies/mL at or after 24 weeks. Treatment modification was defined as the 1st modification of the regimen, including a permanent discontinuation, switch, or substitution.

Time frame: Follow-up time was variable,median follow-up was 138 weeks; see 'Amount of study follow-up' outcome for details

Population: Participants who initiated treatment are included in this analysis. Participants were analyzed per originally assigned regimen.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
EFV, FTC/TDF, and Placebo ABC/3TCTime From Treatment Dispensation to Regimen Failure (First Occurrence of Virologic Failure or Treatment Modification)5th percentile time to regimen failure4 Weeks
EFV, FTC/TDF, and Placebo ABC/3TCTime From Treatment Dispensation to Regimen Failure (First Occurrence of Virologic Failure or Treatment Modification)25th percentile time to regimen failure72 Weeks
EFV, FTC/TDF, and Placebo ABC/3TCTime From Treatment Dispensation to Regimen Failure (First Occurrence of Virologic Failure or Treatment Modification)10th percentile time to regimen failure16 Weeks
EFV, Placebo FTC/TDF, and ABC/3TCTime From Treatment Dispensation to Regimen Failure (First Occurrence of Virologic Failure or Treatment Modification)5th percentile time to regimen failure4 Weeks
EFV, Placebo FTC/TDF, and ABC/3TCTime From Treatment Dispensation to Regimen Failure (First Occurrence of Virologic Failure or Treatment Modification)25th percentile time to regimen failure24 Weeks
EFV, Placebo FTC/TDF, and ABC/3TCTime From Treatment Dispensation to Regimen Failure (First Occurrence of Virologic Failure or Treatment Modification)10th percentile time to regimen failure4 Weeks
RTV-boosted ATV, FTC/TDF, and Placebo ABC/3TCTime From Treatment Dispensation to Regimen Failure (First Occurrence of Virologic Failure or Treatment Modification)10th percentile time to regimen failure16 Weeks
RTV-boosted ATV, FTC/TDF, and Placebo ABC/3TCTime From Treatment Dispensation to Regimen Failure (First Occurrence of Virologic Failure or Treatment Modification)5th percentile time to regimen failure4 Weeks
RTV-boosted ATV, FTC/TDF, and Placebo ABC/3TCTime From Treatment Dispensation to Regimen Failure (First Occurrence of Virologic Failure or Treatment Modification)25th percentile time to regimen failure84 Weeks
RTV-boosted ATV, Placebo FTC/TDF, and ABC/3TCTime From Treatment Dispensation to Regimen Failure (First Occurrence of Virologic Failure or Treatment Modification)5th percentile time to regimen failure4 Weeks
RTV-boosted ATV, Placebo FTC/TDF, and ABC/3TCTime From Treatment Dispensation to Regimen Failure (First Occurrence of Virologic Failure or Treatment Modification)25th percentile time to regimen failure36 Weeks
RTV-boosted ATV, Placebo FTC/TDF, and ABC/3TCTime From Treatment Dispensation to Regimen Failure (First Occurrence of Virologic Failure or Treatment Modification)10th percentile time to regimen failure4 Weeks
Other Pre-specified

Amount of Study Follow-up

Participants were to be followed for 96 weeks after the last enrollment. Accrual was expected to take 96 weeks, thus the planned follow-up time was 96 to 192 weeks, dependent on when in the study the participant enrolled. This outcome summarizes that total amount of actual follow-up in weeks from randomization to last contact.

Time frame: Follow-up time was variable, median follow-up was 138 weeks

Population: Intention to treat: All eligible participants are included. Participants were analyzed per originally assigned regimen.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
EFV, FTC/TDF, and Placebo ABC/3TCAmount of Study Follow-up141.4 Weeks
EFV, Placebo FTC/TDF, and ABC/3TCAmount of Study Follow-up133.3 Weeks
RTV-boosted ATV, FTC/TDF, and Placebo ABC/3TCAmount of Study Follow-up141.6 Weeks
RTV-boosted ATV, Placebo FTC/TDF, and ABC/3TCAmount of Study Follow-up137.3 Weeks
Other Pre-specified

Cumulative Probability of Not Experiencing a Grade 3/4 Safety Event

Kaplan-Meier estimate of the cumulative survival probability at week 48 and 96. Grade 3/4 safety event is defined as a grade 3 or 4 sign, symptom, or laboratory abnormality that is at least one grade higher than at baseline, total bilirubin and creatine kinase (CPK) were excluded. Grading used the Division of AIDS (DAIDS) 2004 Severity of Adverse Events Tables. As-treated analysis censored at 1st modification of initially assigned regimen, participants who never started treatment were excluded.

Time frame: At week 48 and 96

Population: As-treated: Participants who initiated treatment are included in this analysis. Follow-up while on initially assigned treatment is included in the at-risk period.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
EFV, FTC/TDF, and Placebo ABC/3TCCumulative Probability of Not Experiencing a Grade 3/4 Safety EventWeek 4878 percentage of participants
EFV, FTC/TDF, and Placebo ABC/3TCCumulative Probability of Not Experiencing a Grade 3/4 Safety EventWeek 9670 percentage of participants
EFV, Placebo FTC/TDF, and ABC/3TCCumulative Probability of Not Experiencing a Grade 3/4 Safety EventWeek 9658 percentage of participants
EFV, Placebo FTC/TDF, and ABC/3TCCumulative Probability of Not Experiencing a Grade 3/4 Safety EventWeek 4864 percentage of participants
RTV-boosted ATV, FTC/TDF, and Placebo ABC/3TCCumulative Probability of Not Experiencing a Grade 3/4 Safety EventWeek 4879 percentage of participants
RTV-boosted ATV, FTC/TDF, and Placebo ABC/3TCCumulative Probability of Not Experiencing a Grade 3/4 Safety EventWeek 9673 percentage of participants
RTV-boosted ATV, Placebo FTC/TDF, and ABC/3TCCumulative Probability of Not Experiencing a Grade 3/4 Safety EventWeek 4873 percentage of participants
RTV-boosted ATV, Placebo FTC/TDF, and ABC/3TCCumulative Probability of Not Experiencing a Grade 3/4 Safety EventWeek 9666 percentage of participants
Other Pre-specified

Cumulative Probability of Not Experiencing Regimen Failure

Kaplan-Meier estimate of the cumulative survival probability at week 48 and 96. Blood samples for determining virologic failure were obtained at 16 and 24 weeks, and every 12 weeks thereafter. Virologic failure was defined as a confirmed plasma HIV-1 RNA level \>= 1000 copies/mL at or after 16 weeks and before 24 weeks or \>=200 copies/mL at or after 24 weeks. Treatment modification was defined as the 1st modification of the regimen, including a permanent discontinuation, switch, or substitution.

Time frame: At week 48 and 96

Population: Participants who initiated treatment are included in this analysis. Participants were analyzed per originally assigned regimen.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
EFV, FTC/TDF, and Placebo ABC/3TCCumulative Probability of Not Experiencing Regimen FailureWeek 4879 percentage of participants
EFV, FTC/TDF, and Placebo ABC/3TCCumulative Probability of Not Experiencing Regimen FailureWeek 9670 percentage of participants
EFV, Placebo FTC/TDF, and ABC/3TCCumulative Probability of Not Experiencing Regimen FailureWeek 9654 percentage of participants
EFV, Placebo FTC/TDF, and ABC/3TCCumulative Probability of Not Experiencing Regimen FailureWeek 4864 percentage of participants
RTV-boosted ATV, FTC/TDF, and Placebo ABC/3TCCumulative Probability of Not Experiencing Regimen FailureWeek 4880 percentage of participants
RTV-boosted ATV, FTC/TDF, and Placebo ABC/3TCCumulative Probability of Not Experiencing Regimen FailureWeek 9673 percentage of participants
RTV-boosted ATV, Placebo FTC/TDF, and ABC/3TCCumulative Probability of Not Experiencing Regimen FailureWeek 4866 percentage of participants
RTV-boosted ATV, Placebo FTC/TDF, and ABC/3TCCumulative Probability of Not Experiencing Regimen FailureWeek 9657 percentage of participants
Other Pre-specified

Cumulative Probability of Not Experiencing Treatment Modification

Kaplan-Meier estimate of the cumulative survival probability at week 48 and 96. Treatment modification is defined as the 1st modification of the regimen, including a permanent discontinuation, switch, or substitution.

Time frame: At week 48 and 96

Population: Participants who initiated treatment are included in this analysis. Participants were analyzed per originally assigned regimen.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
EFV, FTC/TDF, and Placebo ABC/3TCCumulative Probability of Not Experiencing Treatment ModificationWeek 4880 percentage of participants
EFV, FTC/TDF, and Placebo ABC/3TCCumulative Probability of Not Experiencing Treatment ModificationWeek 9673 percentage of participants
EFV, Placebo FTC/TDF, and ABC/3TCCumulative Probability of Not Experiencing Treatment ModificationWeek 9656 percentage of participants
EFV, Placebo FTC/TDF, and ABC/3TCCumulative Probability of Not Experiencing Treatment ModificationWeek 4867 percentage of participants
RTV-boosted ATV, FTC/TDF, and Placebo ABC/3TCCumulative Probability of Not Experiencing Treatment ModificationWeek 9677 percentage of participants
RTV-boosted ATV, FTC/TDF, and Placebo ABC/3TCCumulative Probability of Not Experiencing Treatment ModificationWeek 4886 percentage of participants
RTV-boosted ATV, Placebo FTC/TDF, and ABC/3TCCumulative Probability of Not Experiencing Treatment ModificationWeek 9662 percentage of participants
RTV-boosted ATV, Placebo FTC/TDF, and ABC/3TCCumulative Probability of Not Experiencing Treatment ModificationWeek 4873 percentage of participants
Other Pre-specified

Cumulative Probability of Not Experiencing Virologic Failure

Kaplan-Meier estimate of the cumulative survival probability at week 48 and 96. Blood samples for determining virologic failure were obtained at 16 and 24 weeks, and every 12 weeks thereafter. Virologic failure was defined as a confirmed plasma HIV-1 RNA level \>= 1000 copies/mL at or after 16 weeks and before 24 weeks or \>=200 copies/mL at or after 24 weeks.

Time frame: At week 48 and 96

Population: Intention to treat: All eligible participants were included in the analysis, participants were analyzed per originally assigned regimen.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
EFV, FTC/TDF, and Placebo ABC/3TCCumulative Probability of Not Experiencing Virologic FailureWeek 4894 percentage of participants
EFV, FTC/TDF, and Placebo ABC/3TCCumulative Probability of Not Experiencing Virologic FailureWeek 9690 percentage of participants
EFV, Placebo FTC/TDF, and ABC/3TCCumulative Probability of Not Experiencing Virologic FailureWeek 9685 percentage of participants
EFV, Placebo FTC/TDF, and ABC/3TCCumulative Probability of Not Experiencing Virologic FailureWeek 4888 percentage of participants
RTV-boosted ATV, FTC/TDF, and Placebo ABC/3TCCumulative Probability of Not Experiencing Virologic FailureWeek 4892 percentage of participants
RTV-boosted ATV, FTC/TDF, and Placebo ABC/3TCCumulative Probability of Not Experiencing Virologic FailureWeek 9689 percentage of participants
RTV-boosted ATV, Placebo FTC/TDF, and ABC/3TCCumulative Probability of Not Experiencing Virologic FailureWeek 4888 percentage of participants
RTV-boosted ATV, Placebo FTC/TDF, and ABC/3TCCumulative Probability of Not Experiencing Virologic FailureWeek 9683 percentage of participants
Other Pre-specified

Number of Participants With a Grade 3/4 Safety Event

Grade 3/4 safety event is defined as a grade 3 or 4 sign, symptom, or laboratory abnormality that is at least one grade higher than at baseline, total bilirubin and creatine kinase (CPK) were excluded. Grading used the Division of AIDS (DAIDS) 2004 Severity of Adverse Events Tables. As-treated analysis censored at 1st modification of initially assigned regimen, participants who never started treatment were excluded.

Time frame: Over all study follow-up while on initially assigned treatment, median follow-up was 120 weeks

Population: As-treated: Participants who initiated treatment are included in this analysis. Follow-up while on initially assigned treatment is included in the at-risk period.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
EFV, FTC/TDF, and Placebo ABC/3TCNumber of Participants With a Grade 3/4 Safety Event145 participants
EFV, Placebo FTC/TDF, and ABC/3TCNumber of Participants With a Grade 3/4 Safety Event182 participants
RTV-boosted ATV, FTC/TDF, and Placebo ABC/3TCNumber of Participants With a Grade 3/4 Safety Event137 participants
RTV-boosted ATV, Placebo FTC/TDF, and ABC/3TCNumber of Participants With a Grade 3/4 Safety Event156 participants
Other Pre-specified

Number of Participants With Regimen Failure

Blood samples for determining virologic failure were obtained at 16 and 24 weeks, and every 12 weeks thereafter. Virologic failure was defined as a confirmed plasma HIV-1 RNA level \>= 1000 copies/mL at or after 16 weeks and before 24 weeks or \>=200 copies/mL at or after 24 weeks. Treatment modification was defined as the 1st modification of the regimen, including a permanent discontinuation, switch, or substitution.

Time frame: Follow-up time was variable, median follow-up was 138 weeks; see 'Amount of study follow-up' outcome for details

Population: Participants who initiated treatment are included in this analysis. Participants were analyzed per originally assigned regimen.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
EFV, FTC/TDF, and Placebo ABC/3TCNumber of Participants With Regimen Failure162 participants
EFV, Placebo FTC/TDF, and ABC/3TCNumber of Participants With Regimen Failure246 participants
RTV-boosted ATV, FTC/TDF, and Placebo ABC/3TCNumber of Participants With Regimen Failure157 participants
RTV-boosted ATV, Placebo FTC/TDF, and ABC/3TCNumber of Participants With Regimen Failure233 participants
Other Pre-specified

Number of Participants With Treatment Modification

Treatment modification is defined as the 1st modification of the regimen, including a permanent discontinuation, switch, or substitution.

Time frame: Follow-up time was variable, median follow-up was 138 weeks; see 'Amount of study follow-up' outcome for details

Population: Participants who initiated treatment are included in this analysis. Participants were analyzed per originally assigned regimen.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
EFV, FTC/TDF, and Placebo ABC/3TCNumber of Participants With Treatment Modification152 participants
EFV, Placebo FTC/TDF, and ABC/3TCNumber of Participants With Treatment Modification239 participants
RTV-boosted ATV, FTC/TDF, and Placebo ABC/3TCNumber of Participants With Treatment Modification138 participants
RTV-boosted ATV, Placebo FTC/TDF, and ABC/3TCNumber of Participants With Treatment Modification216 participants
Other Pre-specified

Number of Participants With Virologic Failure

Blood samples for determining virologic failure were obtained at 16 and 24 weeks, and every 12 weeks thereafter. Virologic failure was defined as a confirmed plasma HIV-1 RNA level \>= 1000 copies/mL at or after 16 weeks and before 24 weeks or \>=200 copies/mL at or after 24 weeks.

Time frame: Follow-up time was variable, median follow-up was 138 weeks; see 'Amount of study follow-up' outcome for details

Population: Intention to treat: All eligible participants were included in the analysis, participants were analyzed per originally assigned regimen.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
EFV, FTC/TDF, and Placebo ABC/3TCNumber of Participants With Virologic Failure57 participants
EFV, Placebo FTC/TDF, and ABC/3TCNumber of Participants With Virologic Failure72 participants
RTV-boosted ATV, FTC/TDF, and Placebo ABC/3TCNumber of Participants With Virologic Failure57 participants
RTV-boosted ATV, Placebo FTC/TDF, and ABC/3TCNumber of Participants With Virologic Failure83 participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 1, 2026