Nerve-Sparing Radical Prostatectomy With or Without Nerve Grafting Followed by Standard Therapy for Erectile Dysfunction in Treating Patients With Localized Prostate Cancer

Prostate Cancer

perioperative/postoperative complications, sexual dysfunction and infertility, sexuality and reproductive issues, adenocarcinoma of the prostate, stage I prostate cancer, stage II prostate cancer, prostaglandin E1, papaverine, phentolamine, Nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy, nerve grafting

RATIONALE: Nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy with nerve grafting followed by standard therapies for erectile dysfunction may be effective in helping patients with prostate cancer improve sexual satisfaction and quality of life. It is not yet known whether erectile dysfunction therapy and nerve-sparing prostatectomy are more effective with or without nerve grafting. PURPOSE: This randomized phase II trial is studying nerve grafting and standard therapy to see how well they work compared to standard therapy alone in treating erectile dysfunction in patients undergoing nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVES: * Compare the efficacy of erectile dysfunction rehabilitation and unilateral cavernous nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy with versus without unilateral autologous interposition sural nerve grafting in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer. * Compare potency rates in patients treated with these regimens. * Compare erection quality in patients treated with these regimens. * Compare time to return of spontaneous erectile activity in patients treated with these regimens. * Compare the feasibility of these regimens in these patients. * Compare quality of life and sexual satisfaction in patients treated with these regimens. * Compare changes in penile erectile length and circumference in patients treated with these regimens. * Compare the relative morbidity of patients treated with these regimens. OUTLINE: This is a randomized, open-label study. Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms. * Arm I: Patients undergo unilateral cavernous nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy with unilateral autologous interposition sural nerve grafting. Beginning 6 weeks after surgery, patients undergo erectile dysfunction rehabilitation comprising any of the following: oral sildenafil (as occasion requires), use of vacuum erection device over 10 minutes once daily, intracavernous Triplemix (prostaglandin E1, papaverine, and phentolamine) injected twice weekly, or MUSE (suppository in urethra for erections) therapy. Erectile dysfunction rehabilitation may continue for up to 2 years or until return of adequate spontaneous erectile activity. * Arm II: Patients undergo unilateral cavernous nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy (without sural nerve grafting) and erectile dysfunction rehabilitation as in arm I. In both arms, treatment continues in the absence of unacceptable toxicity. Quality of life and sexual history are assessed at baseline, at 6 weeks postoperatively, at 4, 8, 12, and 16 months, and then every 4 months for 2 years or until return of spontaneous erectile activity. Patients are followed every 4 months for 2 years. PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 200 patients (120 for arm I and 80 for arm II) will be accrued for this study.

United States