Skip to content

Salivary Gland Surgery Before Radiation Therapy in Preventing Radiation-Caused Xerostomia in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer

A Phase II Study Of Submandibular Salivary Gland Transfer To The Submental Space Prior To Start Of Radiation Treatment For Prevention Of Radiation-Induced Xerostomia In Head And Neck Cancer Patients

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00068237
Enrollment
49
Registered
2003-09-11
Start date
2003-08-31
Completion date
2016-12-31
Last updated
2019-02-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Head and Neck Cancer, Radiation Toxicity, Xerostomia

Keywords

xerostomia, radiation toxicity, stage II squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx, stage III squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx, stage I squamous cell carcinoma of the hypopharynx, stage II squamous cell carcinoma of the hypopharynx, stage III squamous cell carcinoma of the hypopharynx, stage III squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx, untreated metastatic squamous neck cancer with occult primary, stage IV squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx, stage IV squamous cell carcinoma of the hypopharynx, stage IV squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx

Brief summary

RATIONALE: Moving a salivary gland out of the area that will undergo radiation therapy may protect the gland from side effects of radiation therapy and may prevent xerostomia (dry mouth). PURPOSE: Phase II trial to study the effectiveness of salivary gland surgery in preventing xerostomia in patients who are undergoing radiation therapy for head and neck cancer.

Detailed description

OBJECTIVES: * Determine the reproducibility of the surgical technique of submandibular salivary gland transfer in patients with head and neck cancer. * Determine the rate and severity of radiation-induced xerostomia after this surgery in these patients. * Determine the pattern of recurrence, disease-free survival, and overall survival of patients treated with this surgery followed by radiotherapy. * Determine the quality of life of patients treated with this regimen. OUTLINE: This is a multicenter study. Patients undergo surgical transfer of the submandibular salivary gland to the submental space. Within 4-6 weeks after surgery, patients undergo radiotherapy once daily, 5 days a week for 5 ½ to 7 weeks in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Salivary scans are performed before surgery, at 2-3 weeks after surgery, and then at 6 months from the start of radiotherapy. Quality of life is assessed at baseline and at 3, 6, and 12 months from the start of radiotherapy. Patients are followed every 3 months for 2 years and then every 6 months for 3 years and then annually. PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 11-48 patients will be accrued for this study within 1.6 years.

Interventions

Seikaly and Jha method of submandibular salivary gland transfer at the time of surgery for the primary tumor and neck nodes on Day 1

Dose ranging from 54-70 Gy over 5.5-7 weeks, at 2.0 Gy/fraction. Starts within 4-6 weeks of surgery.

Sponsors

National Cancer Institute (NCI)
CollaboratorNIH
Radiation Therapy Oncology Group
Lead SponsorNETWORK

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS: * One of the following diagnoses: * Histologically confirmed, previously untreated squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx, hypopharynx, or larynx * Head and neck cancer of unknown primary with unilateral metastases to the neck nodes * No N3 disease * No carcinoma of the oral cavity or nasopharynx * No bilateral neck node involvement * No suspicious neck node on the contralateral neck or the side chosen for salivary gland transfer by CT scan or MRI * No pre-epiglottic space involvement * No involvement of level 1 nodes on either side of the neck * No salivary gland malignancy * No recurrent disease PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS: Age * At least 18 years old Performance status * Zubrod 0-1 Life expectancy * Not specified Hematopoietic * Hemoglobin at least 10 g/dL Hepatic * Not specified Renal * Not specified Other * Not pregnant or nursing * Negative pregnancy test * Fertile patients must use effective contraception * No salivary gland disease (e.g., Sjögren's syndrome) * No other malignancy within the past 3 years except basal cell or squamous cell skin cancer PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY: Biologic therapy * Not specified Chemotherapy * More than 3 years since prior chemotherapy * No prior or concurrent neoadjuvant chemotherapy * Concurrent adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (in addition to study radiotherapy) allowed Endocrine therapy * Not specified Radiotherapy * See Chemotherapy * No prior radiotherapy to the head and neck * No concurrent intensity-modulated radiotherapy Surgery * Not specified Other * No concurrent cholinergic drugs * No concurrent anti-cholinergic drugs * No concurrent tricyclic drugs * No concurrent prophylactic amifostine or pilocarpine during and for at least 3 months after completion of study radiotherapy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Patients Scored as Having the Surgical Technique of Submandibular Salivary Gland Transfer Performed Per ProtocolAt the time of the submandibular salivary gland transferSurgery will be scored as per protocol prescription if scored as such by both central reviewers- the Study Chair and the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Head and Neck Committee Surgical Chair. If 21 or more of 43 subjects are scored as having surgery per protocol prescription, then the technique will be considered reproducible with 80% power and 5% type I error using Simon's two stage design with unacceptable/acceptable rates set at 60%/80%.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Patients With Normal Functioning Transferred Submandibular GlandPre-surgery, post-surgery (4-6 weeks), post radiation therapy (10-13 weeks)Salivary gland functioning classified as Non-functioning, Minimal function, Well-functioning but some impairment, Normal functioning, or Other is determined by central review of scintigraphy scans using sodium pertechnetate (Na-99mTcO4-) with a sialagogue (lemon juice) administered halfway through the study to determine if secretory function is maintained.
Change From Baseline to One Year in Total Score on the Modified University of Washington Head and Neck Symptom QuestionnaireBaseline and one yearThe University of Washington Head and Neck Symptom Questionnaire, also referred to as the University of Washington Health Related Quality of Life tool (UW-QOL) was modified for use by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG). The resulting UW-QOL-RTOG modification is a valid tool that can be used to assess symptom burden of head and neck cancer patients receiving radiation therapy or those who have recently completed radiation. The UW-QOL-RTOG modification consists of 15 items with response options ranging from 10-50, in multiples of 10. That is, the lowest symptom burden is rated as 10, while the highest symptom burden is rated as 50. The individual item scores are averaged to obtain the final score which also ranges from 10 to 50. This scoring results in a lower score indicating greater HR-QOL; and conversely, higher scores indicating lower health-related quality of life (HR-QOL). Change = baseline score - one year score, such that a positive change score indicates improvement.
Percentage of Patients Experiencing Facial Edema Following SurgeryFrom surgery to 30 days after surgeryFacial edema was noted as present or absent following surgery.
Percentage of Patients With Acute XerostomiaFrom start of treatment to 90 daysThe proportion of patients who experience grade 2 or higher xerostomia or start amifostine and/or pilocarpine within 90 days of the start of radiation therapy. A proportion less than or equal to 51% would be considered acceptable based on the results of the U.S. Bioscience phase III amifostine trial (this trial preceded FDAAA requirements).
Percentage of Patients Experiencing Late Grade 3-4 Toxicity Definitely, Probably, or Possibly Related to Radiation TherapyFrom 91 days from start of radiation therapy to last follow-up. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 5.6 years.Adverse events are graded using the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC) v2.0. Grade refers to the severity of the toxicity by assigning Grades 1 through 5 with unique clinical descriptions of severity for each toxicity based on this general guideline: Grade 1 Mild, Grade 2 Moderate, Grade 3 Severe, Grade 4 Life-threatening or disabling, Grade 5 Death related to toxicity. Late refers to toxicities occurring at least 91 days from the start of radiation therapy.
Disease-free Survival Rate at 2 YearsFrom registration to two yearsFailure was defined as local, regional, or distant recurrence/progression, second primary tumor, or death due to any cause. Disease-free survival time is defined as time from registration to the the date of failure or last known follow-up (censored). Disease-free survival rate is estimated using the kaplan-meier method.
Overall Survival Rate at 2 YearsFrom registration to two yearsFailure was defined as death due to any cause. Survival time is defined as time from registration to the the date of failure or last known follow-up (censored). Survival rate is estimated using the kaplan-meier method.
Percentage of Patients Experiencing Acute Grade 3-4 Toxicity Definitely, Probably, or Possibly Related to Radiation Therapy or ChemotherapyFrom start of radiation therapy to 90 daysAdverse events are graded using the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC) v2.0. Grade refers to the severity of the toxicity by assigning Grades 1 through 5 with unique clinical descriptions of severity for each toxicity based on this general guideline: Grade 1 Mild, Grade 2 Moderate, Grade 3 Severe, Grade 4 Life-threatening or disabling, Grade 5 Death related to toxicity. Acute refers to toxicities occurring less than or equal to 90 days from the start of radiation therapy.

Countries

Canada, United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Surgery + Transfer + Radiation
Submandibular salivary gland transfer at the time of surgery for the primary tumor and neck nodes followed by post-operative radiation therapy.
44
Total44

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyIneligible3
Overall StudyNo protocol treatment received2

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSurgery + Transfer + Radiation
Age, Continuous56.5 years
Sex: Female, Male
Female
8 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
36 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
38 / 44
serious
Total, serious adverse events
2 / 44

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Patients Scored as Having the Surgical Technique of Submandibular Salivary Gland Transfer Performed Per Protocol

Surgery will be scored as per protocol prescription if scored as such by both central reviewers- the Study Chair and the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Head and Neck Committee Surgical Chair. If 21 or more of 43 subjects are scored as having surgery per protocol prescription, then the technique will be considered reproducible with 80% power and 5% type I error using Simon's two stage design with unacceptable/acceptable rates set at 60%/80%.

Time frame: At the time of the submandibular salivary gland transfer

Population: Eligible patients who started study treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Surgery + Transfer + RadiationNumber of Patients Scored as Having the Surgical Technique of Submandibular Salivary Gland Transfer Performed Per Protocol34 participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline to One Year in Total Score on the Modified University of Washington Head and Neck Symptom Questionnaire

The University of Washington Head and Neck Symptom Questionnaire, also referred to as the University of Washington Health Related Quality of Life tool (UW-QOL) was modified for use by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG). The resulting UW-QOL-RTOG modification is a valid tool that can be used to assess symptom burden of head and neck cancer patients receiving radiation therapy or those who have recently completed radiation. The UW-QOL-RTOG modification consists of 15 items with response options ranging from 10-50, in multiples of 10. That is, the lowest symptom burden is rated as 10, while the highest symptom burden is rated as 50. The individual item scores are averaged to obtain the final score which also ranges from 10 to 50. This scoring results in a lower score indicating greater HR-QOL; and conversely, higher scores indicating lower health-related quality of life (HR-QOL). Change = baseline score - one year score, such that a positive change score indicates improvement.

Time frame: Baseline and one year

Population: Eligible patients with both baseline and 1-year questionnaire completed

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Surgery + Transfer + RadiationChange From Baseline to One Year in Total Score on the Modified University of Washington Head and Neck Symptom Questionnaire13.6 score on a scale
Secondary

Disease-free Survival Rate at 2 Years

Failure was defined as local, regional, or distant recurrence/progression, second primary tumor, or death due to any cause. Disease-free survival time is defined as time from registration to the the date of failure or last known follow-up (censored). Disease-free survival rate is estimated using the kaplan-meier method.

Time frame: From registration to two years

Population: Eligible patients who started study treatment

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Surgery + Transfer + RadiationDisease-free Survival Rate at 2 Years71.7 percentage of participants
Secondary

Overall Survival Rate at 2 Years

Failure was defined as death due to any cause. Survival time is defined as time from registration to the the date of failure or last known follow-up (censored). Survival rate is estimated using the kaplan-meier method.

Time frame: From registration to two years

Population: Eligible patients who started study treatment

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Surgery + Transfer + RadiationOverall Survival Rate at 2 Years76.4 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Patients Experiencing Acute Grade 3-4 Toxicity Definitely, Probably, or Possibly Related to Radiation Therapy or Chemotherapy

Adverse events are graded using the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC) v2.0. Grade refers to the severity of the toxicity by assigning Grades 1 through 5 with unique clinical descriptions of severity for each toxicity based on this general guideline: Grade 1 Mild, Grade 2 Moderate, Grade 3 Severe, Grade 4 Life-threatening or disabling, Grade 5 Death related to toxicity. Acute refers to toxicities occurring less than or equal to 90 days from the start of radiation therapy.

Time frame: From start of radiation therapy to 90 days

Population: Eligible patients who started RT

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Surgery + Transfer + RadiationPercentage of Patients Experiencing Acute Grade 3-4 Toxicity Definitely, Probably, or Possibly Related to Radiation Therapy or Chemotherapy34.9 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Patients Experiencing Facial Edema Following Surgery

Facial edema was noted as present or absent following surgery.

Time frame: From surgery to 30 days after surgery

Population: Eligible patients who received the procedure

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Surgery + Transfer + RadiationPercentage of Patients Experiencing Facial Edema Following Surgery13.6 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Patients Experiencing Late Grade 3-4 Toxicity Definitely, Probably, or Possibly Related to Radiation Therapy

Adverse events are graded using the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC) v2.0. Grade refers to the severity of the toxicity by assigning Grades 1 through 5 with unique clinical descriptions of severity for each toxicity based on this general guideline: Grade 1 Mild, Grade 2 Moderate, Grade 3 Severe, Grade 4 Life-threatening or disabling, Grade 5 Death related to toxicity. Late refers to toxicities occurring at least 91 days from the start of radiation therapy.

Time frame: From 91 days from start of radiation therapy to last follow-up. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 5.6 years.

Population: Eligible patients who started RT and had toxicity data at least 90 days from the end of RT

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Surgery + Transfer + RadiationPercentage of Patients Experiencing Late Grade 3-4 Toxicity Definitely, Probably, or Possibly Related to Radiation Therapy7.9 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Patients With Acute Xerostomia

The proportion of patients who experience grade 2 or higher xerostomia or start amifostine and/or pilocarpine within 90 days of the start of radiation therapy. A proportion less than or equal to 51% would be considered acceptable based on the results of the U.S. Bioscience phase III amifostine trial (this trial preceded FDAAA requirements).

Time frame: From start of treatment to 90 days

Population: Eligible patients who started RT

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Surgery + Transfer + RadiationPercentage of Patients With Acute Xerostomia25.6 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Patients With Normal Functioning Transferred Submandibular Gland

Salivary gland functioning classified as Non-functioning, Minimal function, Well-functioning but some impairment, Normal functioning, or Other is determined by central review of scintigraphy scans using sodium pertechnetate (Na-99mTcO4-) with a sialagogue (lemon juice) administered halfway through the study to determine if secretory function is maintained.

Time frame: Pre-surgery, post-surgery (4-6 weeks), post radiation therapy (10-13 weeks)

Population: Eligible patients with salivary scans submitted

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Surgery + Transfer + RadiationPercentage of Patients With Normal Functioning Transferred Submandibular GlandPre-surgery70.3 percentage of participants
Surgery + Transfer + RadiationPercentage of Patients With Normal Functioning Transferred Submandibular GlandPost-surgery16.7 percentage of participants
Surgery + Transfer + RadiationPercentage of Patients With Normal Functioning Transferred Submandibular GlandPost-radiotherapy0.0 percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026