Skip to content

Randomized Open Label Trial Evaluating Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous Immunoglobulin (IVIg, Privigen) as Add-on to SoC Versus SoC Alone for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Patients with Severely Impaired B-cell Function

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTIS
Registry ID
CTIS2025-522756-97-00
Enrollment
92
Registered
2026-02-06
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-02-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

COVID-19 and Severely Impaired B-cell Function

Brief summary

Proportion of participants with clinical recovery (defined as a score of 0 or 1 according to the WHO Clinical Progression Scale) and no detectable SARS-CoV-2 RNA in blood plasma at Day 28, without receiving additional SARS-CoV-2 directed treatment (direct acting antivirals and/or IVIg) beyond SoC after randomization.

Detailed description

Proportion of participants with clinical improvement (defined as a reduced score of ≥1 according to the WHO clinical progression scale) and no detectable SARS-CoV-2 RNA in blood plasma at Day 10 after randomization, Proportion of participants with sustained clinical recovery (defined as a score of 0 or 1 according to the WHO Clinical Progression Scale) and no baseline SARS-CoV-2 straina RNA in blood plasma and nasopharyngeal sample at days 90 and 180, without additional SARS-CoV-2 directed treatment (direct acting antivirals and/or IVIg) beyond SoC after randomization., Ranked-based comparison of 10-category ordinal WHO Clinical Progression Scale score as assessed by the Investigator at days 10 and 28 AR, Proportion of participants with severe COVID-19 (defined as a score of ≥6 according to the WHO clinical progression scale) up to and by Day 28 after randomization., AEs/SAEs. Assessments related to AEs include: Occurrence/frequency, Relationship to the Investigational Medicinal Product (IMP) as assessed by the investigator, Intensity, Seriousness, Death, AEs leading to withdrawal from the study, Other significant AEs

Interventions

Sponsors

Region Vaesterbotten, Umea University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Proportion of participants with clinical recovery (defined as a score of 0 or 1 according to the WHO Clinical Progression Scale) and no detectable SARS-CoV-2 RNA in blood plasma at Day 28, without receiving additional SARS-CoV-2 directed treatment (direct acting antivirals and/or IVIg) beyond SoC after randomization.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Proportion of participants with clinical improvement (defined as a reduced score of ≥1 according to the WHO clinical progression scale) and no detectable SARS-CoV-2 RNA in blood plasma at Day 10 after randomization, Proportion of participants with sustained clinical recovery (defined as a score of 0 or 1 according to the WHO Clinical Progression Scale) and no baseline SARS-CoV-2 straina RNA in blood plasma and nasopharyngeal sample at days 90 and 180, without additional SARS-CoV-2 directed treatment (direct acting antivirals and/or IVIg) beyond SoC after randomization., Ranked-based comparison of 10-category ordinal WHO Clinical Progression Scale score as assessed by the Investigator at days 10 and 28 AR, Proportion of participants with severe COVID-19 (defined as a score of ≥6 according to the WHO clinical progression scale) up to and by Day 28 after randomization., AEs/SAEs. Assessments related to AEs include: Occurrence/frequency, Relationship to the Investigational Medicinal Prod

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTIS · Data processed: Feb 7, 2026