Skip to content

Elotuzumab (E) in Combination with Carfilzomib, Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone (E-KRd) versus KRd prior to and following Autologous Stem Cell Transplant in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma and Subsequent Maintenance with Elotuzumab and Lenalidomide versus Single-Agent Lenalidomide - A phase III study by DSMM (Deutsche Studiengruppe Multiples Myelom)

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTIS
Registry ID
CTIS2024-515783-31-00
Acronym
DSMM_XVII
Enrollment
574
Registered
2024-10-17
Start date
2018-08-24
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-12-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma

Brief summary

For the induction phase: Rate of patients who have VGPR or better response according to IMWG criteria and are MRD-negative as assessed by flow cytometry following six cycles of induction treatment, For the maintenance phase: 3-year PFS rate calculated from randomization

Detailed description

1. Objective response rate (ORR) following induction and consolidation treatment with EKRd versus KRd (response evaluation according to IMWG criteria, refer to Appendix A), 2. ORR at the end of study treatment programme following induction, ASCT, consolidation, and maintenance treatment (response evaluation according to IMWG criteria, refer to Appendix A; target population: Intent - to - Treat), 3. PFS, defined as the time from randomization to the date of disease progression after firstline therapy (study treatment) or death from any cause, 4. PFS 2, defined as the time from randomization to the date of disease progression or death from any cause during/after second-line therapy in the Intent-to-Treat Population, 5. PFS and OS in correlation with cytogenetic abnormalities, 6. Improvement of MRD negativity rate as assessed by flow-cytometry following consolidation treatment, 7. Improvement of MRD negativity rate as assessed by flow-cytometry during maintenance treatment, 8. Disease-free survival (DFS) for patients who obtain MRD negativity as assessed by flowcytometry (at any time point), 9. OS, 10. OS for patients who obtain MRD negativity as assessed by flow-cytometry (at any time point), 11. QoL evaluated with EORTC-QLQ C30 and EORTC multiple myeloma module QLQ-MY20, 12. Type, incidence, relatedness, and severity of adverse events according to NCI CTCAE version 4.03, 13. Occurrence of laboratory abnormalities

Interventions

DRUGElotuzumab
DRUGLENALIDOMIDE
DRUGDEXAMETHASONE DIHYDROGEN PHOSPHATE DISODIUM PH. EUR.
DRUGLenalidomide
DRUGKyprolis 60 mg powder for solution for infusion
DRUGDEXAMETHASONE

Sponsors

Universitaetsklinikum Wuerzburg AöR
Lead SponsorOTHER

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
For the induction phase: Rate of patients who have VGPR or better response according to IMWG criteria and are MRD-negative as assessed by flow cytometry following six cycles of induction treatment, For the maintenance phase: 3-year PFS rate calculated from randomization

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Objective response rate (ORR) following induction and consolidation treatment with EKRd versus KRd (response evaluation according to IMWG criteria, refer to Appendix A), 2. ORR at the end of study treatment programme following induction, ASCT, consolidation, and maintenance treatment (response evaluation according to IMWG criteria, refer to Appendix A; target population: Intent - to - Treat), 3. PFS, defined as the time from randomization to the date of disease progression after firstline therapy (study treatment) or death from any cause, 4. PFS 2, defined as the time from randomization to the date of disease progression or death from any cause during/after second-line therapy in the Intent-to-Treat Population, 5. PFS and OS in correlation with cytogenetic abnormalities, 6. Improvement of MRD negativity rate as assessed by flow-cytometry following consolidation treatment, 7. Improvement of MRD negativity rate as assessed by flow-cytometry during maintenance treatment, 8.

Countries

Austria, Germany

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTIS · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026