Skip to content

Ruxolitinib versus Best Available Therapy in patients with high-risk polycythemia vera or high-risk essential thrombocythemia – The Ruxo-BEAT Trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTIS
Registry ID
CTIS2024-515619-23-00
Acronym
12-181
Enrollment
223
Registered
2024-08-09
Start date
2015-06-29
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-09-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

essential thrombocythemia, polycythemia vera

Brief summary

The rate of complete clinicohematologic responses (CHR) at month 6, compared to baseline, as defined by (Barosi, et al., 2009).

Detailed description

Safety of both regimens., The rate of complete clinicohematologic responses (CHR) at month 12 and month 24 as defined by Barosi et al. Blood 2009 (with the clinical modification that splenomegaly assessment may be done by ultrasound or palpation)., To determine the complete response (CR) rate at month 6 as defined by Barosi et al. Blood 2013 (revised ELN response criteria, see section 15.6) (Barosi, et al., 2013)., The efficacy as assessed by both the absence of phlebotomy (Hct <45%) and reduction in spleen size (palpable spleen that is reduced by > 50% from baseline measured by palpation or ultrasound) OR platelet count < 600 x 10^9/l (ET) at month 6 and month 24, The proportion of subjects achieving both durable absence of phlebotomy eligibility and durable spleen size reduction measured by palpation (PV) OR durable platelet count < 600 x 10^9/l (ET) (durable defined as > 3 months) (Barosi et al. 2009/2013) at month 6, month 12 and month 24., The rate of overall clinicohematologic responses (CR + PR) according to both guidelines (Barosi et al. 2009 and 2013) at month 6 and month 24.

Interventions

Sponsors

Universitaetsklinikum Aachen AöR
Lead SponsorOTHER

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The rate of complete clinicohematologic responses (CHR) at month 6, compared to baseline, as defined by (Barosi, et al., 2009).

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Safety of both regimens., The rate of complete clinicohematologic responses (CHR) at month 12 and month 24 as defined by Barosi et al. Blood 2009 (with the clinical modification that splenomegaly assessment may be done by ultrasound or palpation)., To determine the complete response (CR) rate at month 6 as defined by Barosi et al. Blood 2013 (revised ELN response criteria, see section 15.6) (Barosi, et al., 2013)., The efficacy as assessed by both the absence of phlebotomy (Hct <45%) and reduction in spleen size (palpable spleen that is reduced by > 50% from baseline measured by palpation or ultrasound) OR platelet count < 600 x 10^9/l (ET) at month 6 and month 24, The proportion of subjects achieving both durable absence of phlebotomy eligibility and durable spleen size reduction measured by palpation (PV) OR durable platelet count < 600 x 10^9/l (ET) (durable defined as > 3 months) (Barosi et al. 2009/2013) at month 6, month 12 and month 24., The rate of overall clinicohematologic re

Countries

Germany

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTIS · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026