Skip to content

Randomized Autologous heMatopoietic stem cell transplantation versus alemtuzumab, cladribine or ocrelizumab for patients with relapsing remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RAM-MS)

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTIS
Registry ID
CTIS2024-510630-40-00
Enrollment
100
Registered
2024-06-06
Start date
2018-02-12
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-06-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Multiple sclerosis

Brief summary

The primary efficacy endpoint of this prospective, randomized study is to determine differences between patients in the 2 treatment arms according to the following criteria: Proportion of patients with no evidence of disease activity after a 2 year (96 week) and 5 year (240 week) period. NEDA is the absence of a protocol defined disease activity event.

Detailed description

Proportion of patients with no evidence of disease activity, including atrophy (NEDA 4), as per protocol defined disease activity events (as defined in section 2.2) plus atrophy (measured yearly atrophy above threshold of 0, 4 %) during a 2 year (96 week) and a 5 year (240 week) period4, with re-baseline for brain athrophy at 48 weeks., Time to first protocol-defined disease activity event as defined in section 2.2, Change in EQ-5D-5L from baseline to Week 96, and from baseline to Week 240, Change in Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) from baseline to Week 96, and from baseline to Week 240, Change in Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS)-29 from baseline to Week 96, and from baseline to Week 240, Change in EDSS from baseline (Visit 4.1) to Week 96 , and from baseline to Week 240, The proportion of patients who, at Week 96 and at Week 240, have protocol-defined Confirmed Disability Improvement (CDI) , confirmed stable EDSS or Confirmed Disability Progression (CDP) compared to baseline, Annualized rate of protocol-defined relapses during 96 weeks and 240 weeks from start of study treatment, Time to onset of first protocol-defined relapse from start of study treatment, Change in MRI T2-weighted hyperintense lesion volume from baseline to Weeks 48 and 96, and from baseline to Week 144, 192 and 240, Change in MRI T1-weighted hypointense lesion volume from baseline to Weeks 48 and 96, and from baseline to Week 144, 192 and 240, Change in brain volume from re-baseline at week 48, to week 96, from re-baseline at week 48, to Week 144, 192 and 240, Time to detection of a new MRI T2 lesion, Total number of MRI T1-weighted Gd-enhanced lesions at weeks 24, 48, 96, 144, 192 and 240, Proportion of patients free from T1 Gd-enhancing lesions at weeks 24, 48, 96, 144, 192 and 240, Change in Nine-hole-peg test (9-HPT) score from baseline to week 48, 96 and 240, Change in Timed 25 foot walk (T25FW) score from baseline to week 48, 96 and 240, Change in The Brief International Cognitive Assessment for Multiple Sclerosis (BICAMS) score from baseline to week 96 and 240, Overall survival rate at week 96 and 240, Work productivity and activity impairment at week 96, 144, 192 and 240

Interventions

DRUGSendoxan 1000 mg pulver til injeksjonsvæske
DRUGoppløsning
DRUGOcrevus 300 mg concentrate for solution for infusion

Sponsors

Helse Bergen HF
Lead SponsorOTHER

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 64 Years

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The primary efficacy endpoint of this prospective, randomized study is to determine differences between patients in the 2 treatment arms according to the following criteria: Proportion of patients with no evidence of disease activity after a 2 year (96 week) and 5 year (240 week) period. NEDA is the absence of a protocol defined disease activity event.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Proportion of patients with no evidence of disease activity, including atrophy (NEDA 4), as per protocol defined disease activity events (as defined in section 2.2) plus atrophy (measured yearly atrophy above threshold of 0, 4 %) during a 2 year (96 week) and a 5 year (240 week) period4, with re-baseline for brain athrophy at 48 weeks., Time to first protocol-defined disease activity event as defined in section 2.2, Change in EQ-5D-5L from baseline to Week 96, and from baseline to Week 240, Change in Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) from baseline to Week 96, and from baseline to Week 240, Change in Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS)-29 from baseline to Week 96, and from baseline to Week 240, Change in EDSS from baseline (Visit 4.1) to Week 96 , and from baseline to Week 240, The proportion of patients who, at Week 96 and at Week 240, have protocol-defined Confirmed Disability Improvement (CDI) , confirmed stable EDSS or Confirmed Disability Progression (CDP) compared to baseline, Ann

Countries

Denmark, Netherlands, Norway, Sweden

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTIS · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026