Skip to content

The effect of amantadine as add-on therapy for motor fluctuations in advanced Parkinson’s disease: a randomized double-blinded placebo-controlled trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTIS
Registry ID
CTIS2023-509728-16-00
Enrollment
132
Registered
2024-08-30
Start date
2025-10-10
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-01-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

advanced Parkinson’s disease

Brief summary

The main evaluation criterion is the change from baseline to end-point (3 months) in motor fluctuation (Off-time) assessed by the Hauser diaries (average of 3 consecutive days).

Detailed description

The change from baseline to end-point (3 months): a) Off-time responders rate ; b) The mean score of MDS-UPDRS part IV (Goetz et al., 2008b); c) The mean score of UDysRS part 2A (Goetz et al., 2008a) ; d) The mean score of New freezing of gait questionnaire (Nieuwboer et al., 2009); e) The mean score of Fatigue Severity Scale (Herlofson and Larsen, 2002; Krupp et al., 1989), MDS-UPDRS Part I-II-III (Goetz et al., 2007) f) The mean score of PDQ-39 (Jenkinson et al., 199, The safety of amantadine, expressed as: the percentage of AEs, of severe AEs, of serious AE and of patients’ discontinuation due to AEs, all over the three months of treatment., The change from baseline to week 15 in motor fluctuation (Off-time) assessed by the Hauser diaries comparing patients with GRIN2B polymorphism vs. without, patients with COMTHH vs. patients with COMTLL and in mutated GBA/LRRK2 carriers vs. no GBA/LRRK2 mutation carriers;, The number of patients able to wear the PDMonitor during the first and the second week of assessment and the Short Assessment of Patient Satisfaction on PDMonitor in advanced PD patients;, the agreement in PD monitor outcomes changes from baseline to end-point (3 month) with clinical scales changes

Interventions

DRUGMANTADIX 100 mg
DRUGplacebo d'amantadine

Sponsors

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire De Toulouse
Lead SponsorOTHER

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The main evaluation criterion is the change from baseline to end-point (3 months) in motor fluctuation (Off-time) assessed by the Hauser diaries (average of 3 consecutive days).

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
The change from baseline to end-point (3 months): a) Off-time responders rate ; b) The mean score of MDS-UPDRS part IV (Goetz et al., 2008b); c) The mean score of UDysRS part 2A (Goetz et al., 2008a) ; d) The mean score of New freezing of gait questionnaire (Nieuwboer et al., 2009); e) The mean score of Fatigue Severity Scale (Herlofson and Larsen, 2002; Krupp et al., 1989), MDS-UPDRS Part I-II-III (Goetz et al., 2007) f) The mean score of PDQ-39 (Jenkinson et al., 199, The safety of amantadine, expressed as: the percentage of AEs, of severe AEs, of serious AE and of patients’ discontinuation due to AEs, all over the three months of treatment., The change from baseline to week 15 in motor fluctuation (Off-time) assessed by the Hauser diaries comparing patients with GRIN2B polymorphism vs. without, patients with COMTHH vs. patients with COMTLL and in mutated GBA/LRRK2 carriers vs. no GBA/LRRK2 mutation carriers;, The number of patients able to wear the PDMonitor during the first and

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTIS · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026