neuroendocrine tumours
Conditions
Brief summary
Median PFS defined as time from randomization to radiological progression, or death from any cause
Detailed description
Rate of treatment-related adverse reactions graded according to CTCAE v5.0, Median OS defined as time from randomization to death from any cause, Median PFS defined as time from randomization to radiological progression, or death from any cause, Percent change in SLD from baseline to time of best response, EORTC QoL-questionnaires GI-NET21, Cumulative median AD to target tumor lesions in subjects with CR, PR, SD and PD as best response, according to RECIST evaluations, Correlation between cumulative median AD to target tumor lesions and time to progression, defined as time from randomization to radiological progression., Cumulative median AD and BED to kidneys vs rate of grade 3-4 renal toxicity (estimated and measured GFR), Differences in resource utilization and treatment cost between the two treatment arms, in relation to the respective mPFS and mOS.
Interventions
Sponsors
Eligibility
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Median PFS defined as time from randomization to radiological progression, or death from any cause | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Rate of treatment-related adverse reactions graded according to CTCAE v5.0, Median OS defined as time from randomization to death from any cause, Median PFS defined as time from randomization to radiological progression, or death from any cause, Percent change in SLD from baseline to time of best response, EORTC QoL-questionnaires GI-NET21, Cumulative median AD to target tumor lesions in subjects with CR, PR, SD and PD as best response, according to RECIST evaluations, Correlation between cumulative median AD to target tumor lesions and time to progression, defined as time from randomization to radiological progression., Cumulative median AD and BED to kidneys vs rate of grade 3-4 renal toxicity (estimated and measured GFR), Differences in resource utilization and treatment cost between the two treatment arms, in relation to the respective mPFS and mOS. | — |
Countries
Sweden