Relapsed or Refractory Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma
Conditions
Brief summary
ORR, defined as the proportion of participants achieving either a PR or CR based on Lugano 2014 Response Criteria as determined by an IRC
Detailed description
1. Safety and tolerability of surovatamig - incidence, nature, and severity of AEs/SAEs/AESI, changes in laboratory data, vital signs, and ECGs compared with baseline, incidence and nature of study drug discontinuation, dose reduction, and dose delay due to AEs, 2. Efficacy - DoR and CR, ORR and CR rates, 3. Efficacy - DoCR, TTR, EFS, PFS, TTNT, OS, 4. PK - PK parameters such as such as Cmax, Tmax, Ctrough of surovatamig (at predefined intervals), 5. Immunogenicity -pre-existing and induced ADA for surovatamig, 6. PROs - difference in severity levels in fatigue, pain, cognition and overall side-effect burden, 7. MRD-negative CR rate
Interventions
Sponsors
Eligibility
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| ORR, defined as the proportion of participants achieving either a PR or CR based on Lugano 2014 Response Criteria as determined by an IRC | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| 1. Safety and tolerability of surovatamig - incidence, nature, and severity of AEs/SAEs/AESI, changes in laboratory data, vital signs, and ECGs compared with baseline, incidence and nature of study drug discontinuation, dose reduction, and dose delay due to AEs, 2. Efficacy - DoR and CR, ORR and CR rates, 3. Efficacy - DoCR, TTR, EFS, PFS, TTNT, OS, 4. PK - PK parameters such as such as Cmax, Tmax, Ctrough of surovatamig (at predefined intervals), 5. Immunogenicity -pre-existing and induced ADA for surovatamig, 6. PROs - difference in severity levels in fatigue, pain, cognition and overall side-effect burden, 7. MRD-negative CR rate | — |
Countries
Denmark, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, Sweden