Skip to content

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group, Placebo-Controlled Phase 3 Efficacy and Safety Study of Tezepelumab in Patients with Eosinophilic Esophagitis (CROSSING)

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTIS
Registry ID
CTIS2023-504277-20-00
Acronym
CROSSING
Enrollment
211
Registered
2024-06-24
Start date
2023-01-30
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-01-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a rare, chronic inflammatory disorder triggered by an immune response to foods and aeroantigens and characterized by a combination of esophageal dysfunction and eosinophilic infiltration of the esophagus

Brief summary

1. Histologic response of peak esophageal eosinophil per HPF count of ≤ 6 across all available esophageal levels at Week 24, 2. Change from baseline in DSQ score at Week 24

Detailed description

1. Change from baseline in EoE EREFS at Week 24 and Week 52, 2. Change from baseline in EoE-HSS grade score at Week 24 and Week 52, 3. Change from baseline in EoE-HSS stage score at Week 24 and Week 52, 4. Histologic response of peak esophageal eosinophil per HPF count of ≤ 6 across all available esophageal levels at Week 52, 5. Change from baseline in DSQ score at Week 52, 6. Endoscopic response of total EREFS score of 0 to ≤ 2 with no score > 1 for any of the components and no worsening in any individual component from baseline across all esophageal levels (ie, proximal, mid, and distal) at Week 52, 7. Endoscopic inflammatory remission of EREFS inflammatory subscore (including edema, exudate, and furrows components) of 0 with no worsening in rings or stricture from baseline across all esophageal levels at Week 52., 8. Total endoscopic remission of total EREFS score of 0 across all esophageal levels at Week 52., 9. Change from baseline in peak esophageal eosinophil count (EOS/HPF) at Week 24 and Week 52, 10. Changes from baseline in PEESS Module at Week 24 and Week 52 (adolescents only), 11. Serum trough concentrations at Weeks 0, 4, 12, and 52, 12. Anti-drug antibody at Weeks 0, 12, 24, and 52

Interventions

Sponsors

AstraZeneca AB
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
0 Years to No maximum

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1. Histologic response of peak esophageal eosinophil per HPF count of ≤ 6 across all available esophageal levels at Week 24, 2. Change from baseline in DSQ score at Week 24

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Change from baseline in EoE EREFS at Week 24 and Week 52, 2. Change from baseline in EoE-HSS grade score at Week 24 and Week 52, 3. Change from baseline in EoE-HSS stage score at Week 24 and Week 52, 4. Histologic response of peak esophageal eosinophil per HPF count of ≤ 6 across all available esophageal levels at Week 52, 5. Change from baseline in DSQ score at Week 52, 6. Endoscopic response of total EREFS score of 0 to ≤ 2 with no score > 1 for any of the components and no worsening in any individual component from baseline across all esophageal levels (ie, proximal, mid, and distal) at Week 52, 7. Endoscopic inflammatory remission of EREFS inflammatory subscore (including edema, exudate, and furrows components) of 0 with no worsening in rings or stricture from baseline across all esophageal levels at Week 52., 8. Total endoscopic remission of total EREFS score of 0 across all esophageal levels at Week 52., 9. Change from baseline in peak esophageal eosinophil count (EOS/HPF) a

Countries

Austria, Belgium, Czechia, Denmark, Finland, Germany, Greece, Italy, Netherlands, Norway, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTIS · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026