atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumours (ATRT)
Conditions
Brief summary
Overall survival (2-year follow-up, for Part A non-inferiority of the HDCT arm)
Detailed description
specific for Part A: Test the non-inferiority, as evaluated by OS (5-year follow-up), of three courses of HDCT compared to focal RT plus conventional chemotherapy, specific for Part A: Compare the neurocognitive outcome in the two treatment arms before randomization, 2 and 5 years after randomization, including demonstration and quantification of the superiority of neuropsychological performance in children and adolescents with ATRT following treatment by HDCT, compared to those treated with RT; identification of risk factors for differences in outcome, specific for Part A: Compare the quality of life in the two treatment arms before randomization, 2 and 5 years following randomization, specific for Part A: Compare event-free survival (EFS), progression-free survival (PFS) and OS between arms and to historical controls, specific for Part A: Compare the incidence and severity of Adverse Events (AEs) in each of the arms, specific for Part A: Compare the incidence and severity of late effects in each of the arms, specific for Part A: Assess the response to induction chemotherapy and compare it with that of historical controls, specific for Part B: Assess the efficacy, as evaluated by OS (5-year follow-up), of three courses of HDCT as a consolidation measure following conventional-type chemotherapy in children with ATRT aged <12 months at the time of HDCT and not eligible for randomization in Part A of this protocol, compared to historical controls., specific for Part C: Assess the efficacy, as evaluated by OS (5-year follow-up), of RT as a consolidation measure combined with conventional-type chemotherapy in children aged ≥36 months with ATRT and not eligible for randomization in Part A of this protocol, compared to historical controls, Parts B and C: Assess the neurocognitive outcome in the cohorts following induction at diagnosis, 2 and 5 years after diagnosis, Parts B and C: Assess the quality of life in the cohort following induction at diagnosis, 2 and 5 years after diagnosis, Parts B and C: Compare EFS and PFS to that of historical controls, Parts B and C: Assess the incidence and severity of AEs, Parts B and C: Assess the incidence and severity of late effects, Parts B and C: Assess the response to induction chemotherapy and compare it with that of historical controls
Interventions
Sponsors
Eligibility
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Overall survival (2-year follow-up, for Part A non-inferiority of the HDCT arm) | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| specific for Part A: Test the non-inferiority, as evaluated by OS (5-year follow-up), of three courses of HDCT compared to focal RT plus conventional chemotherapy, specific for Part A: Compare the neurocognitive outcome in the two treatment arms before randomization, 2 and 5 years after randomization, including demonstration and quantification of the superiority of neuropsychological performance in children and adolescents with ATRT following treatment by HDCT, compared to those treated with RT; identification of risk factors for differences in outcome, specific for Part A: Compare the quality of life in the two treatment arms before randomization, 2 and 5 years following randomization, specific for Part A: Compare event-free survival (EFS), progression-free survival (PFS) and OS between arms and to historical controls, specific for Part A: Compare the incidence and severity of Adverse Events (AEs) in each of the arms, specific for Part A: Compare the incidence and severity of late eff | — |
Countries
Belgium, Czechia, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Netherlands, Norway, Spain, Sweden