Skip to content

Comparison of Clinical and Patient-Reported Outcomes Between Piezoelectric and Standard Rotary Instruments in Surgical Crown Lengthening

Comparison of Clinical and Patient-Reported Outcomes Between Piezoelectric and Standard Rotary Instruments in Surgical Crown Lengthening

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
TCTR
Registry ID
TCTR20260711001
Enrollment
30
Registered
2026-07-11
Start date
2025-01-27
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Teeth with insufficient clinical crown length requiring surgical crown lengthening to facilitate restorative or prosthetic treatment. Crown Lengthening

Interventions

Surgical crown lengthening performed using piezoelectric instruments for osteotomy and osteoplasty.,Surgical crown lengthening performed using standard rotary instruments for osteotomy and osteoplasty
Experimental Device,Active Comparator Device
Piezoelectric surgical instrumentation,Standard rotary surgical instrumentation

Sponsors

The Faculty of Dentistry, Srinakharinwirot University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. aged 18 years or olde 2. presence of teeth requiring crown lengthening for restorative purposes 3. treated teeth and adjacent teeth with probing depth less than or equal 3 mm 4. clinically healthy gingiva according to the 2017 classification of periodontal diseases 5. adequate width of attached gingiva, with at least 2 mm remaining after gingival resection 6. tooth mobility not exceeding Grade 1 7. a post-surgical crown-to-root ratio not exceeding 1:1 without furcation involvement.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. previous surgical intervention at the study site 2. smoking or smoking cessation within less than 2 years before baseline examination 3. pregnancy or lactation 4. systemic conditions or contraindications that could affect surgery, wound healing, or bone metabolism 5. presence of a cardiac pacemaker.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Clinical parameters Baseline, immediately after surgery, 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, and 3 months postoperatively Clinical periodontal measurements using a UNC-15 periodontal probe and a customized acrylic stent with vertical grooves,Postoperative pain Immediately after surgery and daily for 7 postoperative days Visual Analog Scale

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Relative radiographic interdental bone level Baseline, immediately after surgery, and 3 months postoperatively Standardized periapical radiographs using a customized acrylic stent

Countries

Thailand

Contacts

Public ContactPiyarat Tomaneepitak

Faculty of Dentistry, Srinakharinwirot University, Bangkok, Thailand

piyarat.aemon@g.swu.ac.th0614544146

Outcome results

None listed

Source: TCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Aug 10, 2026