Skip to content

A Comparison of Gingival Depigmentation outcomes Between Electrosurgery and Ceramic bur

A Comparison of Gingival Depigmentation outcomes Between Electrosurgery and Ceramic bur: split-mouth design

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
TCTR
Registry ID
TCTR20260709003
Enrollment
12
Registered
2026-07-09
Start date
2022-02-10
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Gingival depigmentation outcomes of ceramic burs compared with electrosurgery Black gum, Ceramic bur, Electrosurgery, Dental esthetics, Gingival depigmentation, Gingival hyperpigmentation

Interventions

For the electrosurgery-treated site, the loop electrode was also continuously moved with brushing strokes along the contour of the gingival margin. The setting power was not more than 5. The gingival
Active Comparator Device,Experimental Device
Electrosurgery,ceramic bur

Sponsors

Faculty of Dentistry, Mahidol University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1) over 18 years old with gingival hyperpigmentation at the attached gingiva on the labial surface of the contralateral upper anterior teeth due to normal variation; 2) healthy; 3) non-smokers or former smokers who had quit smoking for at least 2 weeks before and during the study period; 4) having all remaining permanent teeth from the upper right first premolar to the upper left first premolar; 5) having a thick gingival phenotype; and 6) having no probing depth greater than 4 mm in the study area.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. oral lesions affecting the soft tissue and underlying bone in the study area 2. systemic diseases affecting gingival hyperpigmentation 3. being on medications affecting gingival color, such as chloroquine, quinine, minocycline, zidovudine, chlorpromazine, ketoconazole, bleomycin, and cyclophosphamide 4. undergoing orthodontic treatment 5. pregnant women 6. having received radiotherapy in the oral and maxillofacial region or anti-angiogenic or anti-resorptive chemotherapy and 7. having a pacemaker

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Depigmentation outcome at 7 and 14 days and 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively DOPI index

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Healing outcome immediately and at 7 days postoperatively Bleeding index ,Healing outcome 7 and 14 days and 1 months Healing index,Pain at 1, 3 and 7 days postoperatively VAS score,Depigmentation outcome at 7 and 14 days and 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively The percentage of black area

Countries

Thailand

Contacts

Public ContactPoranee Vongsakulpaisarn

Faculty of Dentistry, Mahidol University

poranee.von@mahidol.ac.th022007841

Outcome results

None listed

Source: TCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Aug 10, 2026