Skip to content

Outcome comparisons between plastic and metal cannulas for hemodialysis vascular access

Outcome comparisons between plastic and metal cannulas for hemodialysis vascular access

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
TCTR
Registry ID
TCTR20260619007
Enrollment
30
Registered
2026-06-19
Start date
2026-07-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

The sample includes 30 participants, aged 17 to 70 years, who undergo hemodialysis at least twice a week through an arteriovenous fistula. Hemodialysis Vascular Access, Hemodialysis patient

Interventions

Participants will be invited to participate in the study by the hemodialysis nursing team responsible for their care. All participants who consent to participate will undergo a baseline ultrasound exa
Experimental Procedure/Surgery
The group of hemodialysis patients who used metal needles and plastic needles for vascular access during hemodialysis treatment

Sponsors

Thammasat University Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
17 Years to 70 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients must have a normal vascular access confirmed by ultrasound prior to participation. Participants will first receive hemodialysis using metal cannulas for 6 consecutive sessions over 2-3 weeks, depending on their individual dialysis frequency. After the initial phase, participants will undergo a second ultrasound assessment of their vascular access.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Active Skin Disease: Patients with active skin lesions that have been assessed by the researcher and deemed at risk for infection due to cannulation for hemodialysis. Withdrawal or Termination Criteria 1.Cannulation Failure 1.1 Inability to cannulate due to infiltrative injury or new arteriovenous fistula (AVF) stenosis. 1.2 Inability to cannulate with plastic cannulas is one of the outcomes being compared between the two types of cannulas, as outlined in Secondary Objective 2, which focuses on the success rates of cannulation. 1.3 New AVF stenosis is an additional outcome, aligning with Secondary Objective 3, which specifically compares infiltrative injuries between groups to assess the safety of both types of cannulas, infiltrative injury and new AVF stenosis. 2. Inability to Complete the Study, Participants who cannot complete the study duration as required.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To compare the level of pain during cannulation between plastic and metal cannulas in patients undergoing hemodialysis. Pain score during cannulation and during cannula removal every hemodialysis 12 session Pain score

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Patients comfortable score during HD 12 comfortable score

Countries

Thailand

Contacts

Public ContactNuttaya Seetadee

Chaloem Phrakiat 60th Anniversary Dialysis Center, Thammasat University Hospital

nuttaya1123@gmail.com0902936361

Outcome results

None listed

Source: TCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Aug 10, 2026