Skip to content

Success Rate and Procedural Confidence of Second-Year Anesthesiology Residents Performing Dural Puncture Epidural Versus Conventional Epidural for Labor Analgesia

Success Rate and Procedural Confidence of Second-Year Anesthesiology Residents Performing Dural Puncture Epidural Versus Conventional Epidural for Labor Analgesia

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
TCTR
Registry ID
TCTR20260605003
Enrollment
160
Registered
2026-06-05
Start date
2026-06-15
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Labor pain during vaginal delivery requiring neuraxial labor analgesia Second-Year Anesthesiology Residents, Dural Puncture Epidural, Conventional Epidural, Labor Analgesia

Interventions

Participants randomized to this group will receive labor epidural analgesia using the dural puncture epidural technique. After identification of the epidural space, a small spinal needle will be advan
Experimental Procedure/Surgery,Experimental Procedure/Surgery
dural puncture epidural (DPE) technique ,conventional epidural

Sponsors

Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Thailand
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 55 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: I. Pregnant women who 1. Requesting neuraxial analgesia for labor 2. Age 18 years or above 3. Gestational age of 36 weeks or above 4. Singleton pregnancy 5. In active labor with no immediate indication for cesarean delivery 6. Ability to communicate effectively and assess pain using standard pain scales 7. Ability to understand the study information in Thai sufficiently to provide valid written informed consent. II. Second-year anesthesiology residents who have performed fewer than 10 epidural procedures before study participation.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Pregnant women who have 1. Contraindications to neuraxial anesthesia, including but not limited to coagulopathy or thrombocytopenia, local infection at the puncture site, systemic infection or sepsis, and increased intracranial pressure 2. History of spinal deformity or prior spinal surgery 3. Body mass index (BMI) equal to or above 40 4. Inability to cooperate with the procedure or to reliably report pain scores 5. Known allergy or hypersensitivity to local anesthetics or opioids used in the study protocol

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
pain score 30 minutes numeric rating scale (NRS) pain score

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Motor block 30 minutes modified Bromage scale,Confidence of trainee at the end of procedure self-report Resident Confidence Questionnaire

Countries

Thailand

Contacts

Public ContactJitsupa Nithiuthai

Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University

jitsupa.nit@mahidol.ac.th0654536516

Outcome results

None listed

Source: TCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Aug 10, 2026