Skip to content

The Effect of Closed Incisional Negative Pressure Therapy on Rate of Surgical Site Infection in High-Risk Orthopaedic Patients: A Single-Center Randomized Controlled Trial

The Effect of Closed Incisional Negative Pressure Therapy on Rate of Surgical Site Infection in High-Risk Orthopaedic Patients: A Single-Center Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
TCTR
Registry ID
TCTR20260601030
Enrollment
58
Registered
2026-06-01
Start date
2023-01-09
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Surgical site infection Orthopaedic fracture Wound complication following operative fracture fixation Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy Surgical Wound Infection Fractures, Bone Fracture Fixation, Internal Wound Healing Quality of Life Postoperative Complications Randomized Controlled Trial

Interventions

After wound closure, occlusive drape (Ioban
3M) was applied 2 cm along each incision side. Non-adherent paraffin gauze (Bactigras
Smith &amp
Nephew) was placed over the incision, followed by a 1-inch polyurethane foam strip with a 16-French nasogastric tube as suction conduit, sealed with occlusive drape. Continuous negative pressure of -7
Active Comparator Procedure/Surgery,Active Comparator Procedure/Surgery
Incisional negative pressure wound therapy (iNPWT),Conventional wound dressing

Sponsors

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Police General Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Single-system musculoskeletal injury requiring operative internal fixation 2. Presence of at least one SSI risk factor as defined by the 2017 International Multidisciplinary Consensus on closed incision negative pressure therapy (Willy et al., Int Wound J 2017), including: Patient-related risk factors: - Diabetes mellitus - Obesity (BMI >30 kg/m2) - Active tobacco use - Hypoalbuminaemia - Corticosteroid use - Active alcoholism - Chronic renal insufficiency - Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) - Hypertension - Advanced age (>80 years) Wound- and procedure-related risk factors: - High-tension incision - Traumatized soft tissue - Wound contamination - Open fracture - Repeated incisions at the same site - Prolonged operative time (>120 minutes) - High-risk anatomical site (calcaneus or tibial plateau) - Fasciotomy at same admission - Emergency surgical procedure

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Pregnancy 2. Incarceration

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Surgical site infection Within 180 days postoperatively Rate of SSI classified per CDC surveillance definitions (superficial incisional, deep incisional, or organ/space); assessed by attending surgeon blinded to group allocation

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Wound dehiscence Postoperative days 3, 5, 7, 10, 14, and 30 Proportion of patients with wound dehiscence assessed by clinical examination using World Union of Wound Healing Societies (WUWHS) criteria,Dressing-related complications Postoperative day 3 Proportion of patients with blister formation, skin maceration, or device-associated skin injury assessed by clinical examination,Length of hospital stay At discharge Number of days from surgery to discharge recorded from hospital records,Health-related quality of life Postoperative days 5, 30, 90, and 180 Mean EQ-5D-5L Visual Analogue Scale score (0-100; higher scores indicate better health) assessed by patient self-report,Scar quality Postoperative days 30, 90, and 180 Mean POSAS 2.0 patient scale score (lower scores indicate better scar quality) assessed by patient self-report

Countries

Thailand

Contacts

Public ContactAnuwat Thanasornwichaya

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Police General Hospital

topanuwat29@gmail.com022076000

Outcome results

None listed

Source: TCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Aug 10, 2026