Skip to content

Slow-Pull versus Wet versus Dry Suction for endoscopic ultrasound guided fine- needle biopsy A single center, prospective randomized study

Slow-Pull versus Wet versus Dry Suction for endoscopic ultrasound guided fine- needle biopsy A single center, prospective randomized study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
TCTR
Registry ID
TCTR20260422004
Enrollment
90
Registered
2026-04-22
Start date
2026-04-07
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-04-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

any gastrointestinal tract lesion for which EUS-FNB is indicated EUS FNB, dry suction, slow pull, wet suction

Interventions

The 1st puncture Insert the FNB needle into the target lesion under EUS guidance. Perform a to and fro motion of the needle within the lesion. Meanwhile, slowly withdraw the stylet little by little (
slow pull dry suction wet suction,wet suction dry suction slow pull,dry suction slow pull wet suction

Sponsors

Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Patients more than 18 year of age with any gastrointestinal tract lesion for which EUS-FNB is indicated and good performance status

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Bleeding disorders 2. Uncorrectable coagulopathy with coagulation factors or fresh frozen plasma 3. Concomitant anticoagulant use that cannot be discontinued 4. Pregnant or breastfeeding women 5. Lesions with cystic component more than 50 percent of the total volume 6. Inability to visualize or access the target lesion during EUS 7. Contraindications to conscious sedation or general anesthesia 8. Severe cardiorespiratory dysfunction precluding safe procedure 9. Patients from whom tissue samples were not collected using all three methods 10. Patients who have previously participated in the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Tissue integrity score 2 week Tissue integrity score

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
the diagnostic yield 2 week pathology,Macroscopic on site evaluation (MOSE) immediately length of aggregate white tissue,Blood contamination score immediately score,the rate of adverse events associated with each sampling technique. immediately rate, Duration of technique immediately minute

Countries

Thailand

Contacts

Public ContactAtta Ajjimarungsi

prince of songkla university

A_T_T_A@hotmail.com0841913088

Outcome results

None listed

Source: TCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: May 1, 2026