Effectiveness of the AI-assisted flipped classroom SATORI model: a pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 3

Study type

Interventional

Source

TCTR

Registry ID

TCTR20260422001

Enrollment

Registered

2026-04-22

Start date

2026-05-01

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Healthy Medical education

Interventions

The SATORI model intervention follows a structured three-phase workflow: 1. Pre-class (Search &amp

AuThenticate): Students use generative AI (e.g., Gemini, ChatGPT) to retrieve information on clinical topics, followed by mandatory verification of all references in standard databases like PubMed or

summaries . 3. Post-class (Reflect &amp

Insight): A brief online reflection focusing on AI process insights and clinical application .,The Control Group will receive a 30-minute standard lecture covering identical learning objectives delive

Experimental Other,Active Comparator Other

AI-assisted flipped classroom,Traditional lecture

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Age

20 Years to 30 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Fourth- and fifth-year medical students in clinical rotations at Lampang Hospital. 2. Active participation in clinical rotations during the study period. 3. Voluntary written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Students unable to attend scheduled sessions. 2. Students who decline to participate.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Delayed knowledge retention 4 weeks post-intervention Mean MCQ z-scores calculated from standardized clinical topic tests (validated for difficulty and content coverage)	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Immediate Knowledge Gain Immediately after the 30-minute in-class session Mean MCQ scores calculated from standardized clinical topic tests,Learning Efficiency Index (LEI) Immediately after the in-class session A calculated ratio of test performance relative to the total time-on-task (pre-class preparation + in-class session),Subjective cognitive load Immediately after the in-class session NASA Task Load Index (NASA-TLX) self-assessment scale,System Usability Immediately after the in-class session System Usability Scale,AI literacy and verification behavior Throughout the intervention period and at 4 weeks follow-up Evaluation using a structured AI literacy rubric (assessing prompting and verification skills) and thematic analysis of written reflections	—

Measure

Time frame

Immediate Knowledge Gain Immediately after the 30-minute in-class session Mean MCQ scores calculated from standardized clinical topic tests,Learning Efficiency Index (LEI) Immediately after the in-class session A calculated ratio of test performance relative to the total time-on-task (pre-class preparation + in-class session),Subjective cognitive load Immediately after the in-class session NASA Task Load Index (NASA-TLX) self-assessment scale,System Usability Immediately after the in-class session System Usability Scale,AI literacy and verification behavior Throughout the intervention period and at 4 weeks follow-up Evaluation using a structured AI literacy rubric (assessing prompting and verification skills) and thematic analysis of written reflections

—

Countries

Thailand

Contacts

Public ContactThanawat Vongchaiudomchoke

Lampang Hospital

thanawat.lp@cpird.in.th054 237 400

Outcome results

None listed

Source: TCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Aug 10, 2026