Tooth loss
Conditions
Interventions
Participants receive a customized titanium abutment and a monolithic zirconia implant-supported restoration with a 30-degree emergence angle.,Participants receive a prefabricated titanium abutment and
Customized titanium abutment with 30-degree emergence angle,Prefabricated titanium abutment with 50-degree emergence angle,Customized titanium abutment with 50-degree emergence angle
Sponsors
University of Zurich, Clinic of Reconstructive Dentistry
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: 1. At least 18 years old 2. Need for reconstructive treatment with a dental implant in the molar area 3. Implant impression at least 8 weeks after implant placement 4. Periodontally healthy patients (periodontal probing depths less than 4 mm) (Full mouth) 5. Good oral hygiene (Plaque control record <25% (O'Leary et al. 1972) 6. Adequate control of inflammation (full mouth bleeding on probing <25% (Ainamo and Bay 1975) 7. Capability to comply with the study procedures 8. Informed consent as documented by signature
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: 1. Pregnant or lactating women 2. Smokers more than 10 cigarettes per day 3. Currently taking drugs that influence bone metabolism 4. Use of bisphosphonates in the last 4 years 5. History of malignancy, radiotherapy or chemotherapy for malignancy in the past 5 years
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Marginal bone level changes from baseline (final restoration) 1-year after final restoration Millimeter changes from Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Clinical parameters 1-year after final restoration Probing depth (PD), Plaque control record (PCR), Modified Sulcus Bleeding Index (mSBI), Bleeding on probing (BOP), Keratinized mucosa (KM), Recession (REC), Crown height,Horizontal thickness of hard tissue 1-year after final restoration Millimeter changes from CBCT,Volumetric changes 1-year after final restoration Bone density from CBCT,Peri-implant health 1-year after final restoration biological complications and molecular analysis peri-implant crevicular fluid (PICF),Esthetic parameters: Pink Esthetic Score (PES)/ White Esthetic Score (WES) 1-year after final restoration PES/WES,Technical complications based on United States Public Health Service System (USPHS) 1-year after final restoration USPHS criteria,Patient-reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) 1-year after final restoration Questionnaires on Brushing discomfort, Patients' satisfaction, Overall esthetic satisfaction (OES),Clinician-reported outcome measures (ClinROMs) 1-year after final restoration Questionnaires on clinicians' satisfaction | — |
Countries
Thailand
Contacts
Public ContactKajorn Kungsadalpipob
Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University
Outcome results
None listed