Skip to content

Two airway devices in C-Spine immobilization intubation among emergency medicine residents: randomized crossover trial

Video Laryngoscopy Versus Flexible Fiberoptic Bronchoscopy for Endotracheal Intubation Under Cervical Spine Immobilization: A Randomized Crossover Manikin Trial Among Emergency Medicine Residents

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
TCTR
Registry ID
TCTR20260312001
Enrollment
40
Registered
2026-03-12
Start date
2025-06-27
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

A manikin with three c-spine immobilization scenarios: 1) no c-spine immobilization 2) manual in-line 3) cervical collar Endotracheal intubation, Cervical spine immobilization, Cervical spine motion restriction, Video laryngoscope, Flexible fiberoptic bronchoscope, Emergency airway management

Interventions

orotracheal Intubation with video laryngoscope,orotracheal Intubation with Flexible fiberoptic brochoscopy,Orotracheal Intubation with video laryngoscopy,orotracheal Intubation with Flexible fiberopti
Normal airway with VL,Normal airway with FOB,manual in-line with VL ,manual in-line with FOB,rigid cervical collar with VL,rigid cervical collar with FOB

Sponsors

-
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Emergency medicine residents who had completed training in endotracheal intubation using both flexible fiberoptic bronchoscope and video laryngoscope 2. willing to participate by providing informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.Residents who had any health conditions that prevented them from performing endotracheal intubation .

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
time to success at the perform date seconds

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
first attempt success at the perform date times,time to glottic visualization at the perform date seconds,Glottic visualization grading at the perform date Comack-Lehane grading by reviewers,Ease of use at the perform date 5-point Likert scale

Countries

Thailand

Contacts

Public ContactADISAK NITHIMATHACHOKE

Navamindradhiraj University

adisak@nmu.ac.th022443189

Outcome results

None listed

Source: TCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Aug 10, 2026