Skip to content

Comparison of Diagnostic Yield between Conventional Bronchoscopy and Radial Endobronchial Ultrasound (R-EBUS)-guided Bronchoscopy under Fluoroscopy: A Retrospective Study at Phrapokklao Hospital, Chanthaburi

Comparison of Diagnostic Yield between Conventional Bronchoscopy and Radial Endobronchial Ultrasound (R-EBUS)-guided Bronchoscopy under Fluoroscopy: A Retrospective Study at Phrapokklao Hospital, Chanthaburi

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
TCTR
Registry ID
TCTR20260222002
Enrollment
100
Registered
2026-02-22
Start date
2026-01-30
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Adult patients undergoing diagnostic bronchoscopy for peripheral pulmonary lesions between October 2023 and October 2025 were included Radial endobronchial ultrasound

Interventions

Intervention that required radial endobronchial ultrasonography guided bronchoscopy performed under fluoroscopic guidance,Intervention that required conventional flexible bronchoscopy performed withou
Diagnostic,Diagnostic
R-EBUS bronchoscopy with flu,Conventional bronchoscopy

Sponsors

Phrapokkloa Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Consecutive adult patients (aged >18 years) who underwent diagnostic bronchoscopy for pulmonary lesions during the study period were eligible for inclusion. 2. Eligible cases included procedures performed with the intent to obtain a pathological diagnosis using either conventional flexible bronchoscopy or radial endobronchial ultrasonography (R EBUS) guided bronchoscopy under fluoroscopic guidance. 3. Patients with pathological results and clinical or radiological follow-up were not used as exclusion criteria. 4. Patients with non-diagnostic bronchoscopic findings were retained in the analysis.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Patients whose bronchoscopy was performed for non-diagnostic indications. 2. Patients whose the target lesion was endobronchially visible during bronchoscopy, or if no bronchoscopic sampling was attempted. 3. Patients with incomplete diagnostic data or follow-up data.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Diagnostic yield (defined according to the ATS/ACCP Delphi consensus) 2 years Proportion of bronchoscopic procedures that established a specific malignant or specific benign diagnosis sufficient to guide clinical management, divided by the total number of procedures performed

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Factors associated with diagnostic yield: Age 2 years years,Gender 2 years Male vs female,Smoking history 2 years Smoker vs non-smoker,COPD diagnosis 2 years Numbers patients of presence vs absence of COPD ,Lesion locations 2 years Upper lobe vs non-upper lobe locations,Presence of CT bronchus sign 2 years Numbers of presence vs absence of CT bronchus sign,Mean lesion diameters 2 years centimeters,Lesion type 2 years solid vs non-solid

Countries

Thailand

Contacts

Public ContactBancha Saksitthichok

Phrapokkloa hospital

bancha.sak@gmail.com0841550800

Outcome results

None listed

Source: TCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Aug 10, 2026