Skip to content

Anatomical feasibility of transcatheter pulmonary valve replacement in native right ventricular outflow tract when compared to surgical pulmonary valve

Anatomical feasibility of transcatheter pulmonary valve replacement in native right ventricular outflow tract when compared to surgical pulmonary valve

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
TCTR
Registry ID
TCTR20251228004
Enrollment
80
Registered
2025-12-28
Start date
1970-01-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

There are several factors that influence the successful implantation of TPVR in native RVOT, including RVOT diameter and morphology. We compared these characteristics between TPVR and SPVR groups and sought to identify morphological and dimensional predictors of successful TPVR outcomes. Native right ventricular outflow tract, Right ventricular outflow tract morphology, Transcatheter pulmonary valve replacement (TPVR), Surgical pulmonary valve replacement (SPVR), Landing zone

Interventions

The patients who underwent redo -transcatheter pulmonary valve replacement (TPVR) for a native RVOT dysfunction following primary repair of their congenital heart disease.,The patients who underwent r
Screening,Screening
Transcatheter pulmonary valve replacement patients.,Surgical pulmonary valve replacement patients.

Sponsors

None listed

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients who underwent redo-PVR (TPVR or SPVR) for a native RVOT dysfunction following primary repair of their congenital heart disease were included. The patients required to have data from a cardiac catheterization and cardiac MRI/CTA which completely obtained RVOT /MPA angiography prior to redo-PVR in order to re-evaluate the RVOT morphology and size in this study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients who had incomplete obtained data were excluded.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Comparison of RVOT size and morphology between TPVR and SPVR groups. Retrospective study, collected data before 30 September 2025 The landing zone (LZ) diameter and area from cardiac MRI or CTA and cardiac catheterization with balloon sizing of MPA were measured in all patients.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Predictors of successful TPVR outcomes Retrospective study, collected data before 30 September 2025 To analyze morphological RVOT parameters that predict successful TPVR

Countries

Thailand

Contacts

Public ContactKritvikrom Durongpisitkul

Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital

kritvikrom.dur@mahidol.ac.th66819875334

Outcome results

None listed

Source: TCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Aug 10, 2026