efficacy of treatment in Cubital tunnel syndrome, minimal incision endoscopic versus open technique time return to work. post operative pain. functional outcome. complications. scar satisfaction Cubital tunnel syndrome, endoscopic release, open release, time return to work, post operative pain, scar satisfaction, functional outcome, complications.
Conditions
Interventions
Minimal incision endoscopic release for treatment cubital tunnel syndrome n 15,Open release for treatment cubital tunnel syndrome n 15
Experimental Procedure/Surgery,Active Comparator Procedure/Surgery
Minimal incision endoscopic release,Open release
Sponsors
Orthopaedics, Police General Hospital
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: 1. Adults aged 18 to 60 years old 2. Diagnosed with cubital tunnel syndrome classified as modified McGowan grade I or II
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: 1. Prior surgery or trauma involving the affected elbow 2. Other peripheral nerve entrapments or generalized neurological conditions 3. Cognitive impairment 4. Anatomical abnormalities of the elbow 5. Clinically evident ulnar nerve subluxation 6. Inability to complete postoperative follow-up evaluations
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Time return to work (days) Post operative Content/case record form,Post operative pain (Visual analog score) Post operative day 1 to 7, then at 2weeks, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months Questionnaire, content/case record form | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Functional outcome (Modified Bishop score) Post operative at 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months Questionnaire, content/case record form,Scar satisfaction (Modified Vancouver scar scale) Post operative at 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months Questionnaire, content/case record form,Complications Post operative Content/case record form | — |
Countries
Thailand
Contacts
Public ContactNuttapath Tepsen
Police General Hospital
Outcome results
None listed