Rehabilitation with Land-Based, Visual and Vestibular Modifications: A Strategy to Reduce Fall Risk and Improve Quality of Life in the Older Adults

Status

Recruiting

Phases

Early Phase 1

Study type

Interventional

Source

TCTR

Registry ID

TCTR20251116001

Enrollment

Registered

2025-11-16

Start date

2025-08-18

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Fall risk and balance impairment among older adults Accidental Falls

Interventions

The intervention group was given: (1) balance exercises consisting of static balance (feet together, one-leg stand, tandem stance) and dynamic balance (tandem walking, obstacle crossing, and backward

(2) followed by a sit-to-stand exercise for 30 seconds

(3) and standing on a wobble board for 30 seconds. being conducted twice a week for 12 weeks.,The control group received only balance exercises (static balance (feet together, one-leg stand, tandem st

Experimental Other,Active Comparator Other

Intervention Group: Balance Rehabilitation with Land-Based, Visual and Vestibular Modifications,Control Group: Balance rehabilitation

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Age

60 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Aged 60 years or older. 2. Score above or equal to nine on the Indonesian version of the Fall Efficacy Scale (FES-I). 3. Able to communicate sufficiently to follow instructions and complete study assessments. 4. Willingness to participate and able to give written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Adult people with serious medical conditions that interfere with their routine activities 2. Adult people who have participated in muscle strengthening or balance training programs within the past 6 months.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Falls Efficacy Scale- International (FES-I) Short Version Collected at baseline (before intervention) and at the end of the intervention period (after twelve weeks) Self-reported questionnaire assessing fear of falling and concern about falls during daily activities; total score indicates level of fall risk (higher score, greater concern / risk),WHOQOL-BREF Collected at baseline (before intervention) and at the end of the intervention period (after twelve weeks) Quality of life was measured with the WHOQOL-BREF, assessing physical, psychological, social, and environmental domains, where higher scores indicate better quality of life	—

Measure

Time frame

Falls Efficacy Scale- International (FES-I) Short Version Collected at baseline (before intervention) and at the end of the intervention period (after twelve weeks) Self-reported questionnaire assessing fear of falling and concern about falls during daily activities; total score indicates level of fall risk (higher score, greater concern / risk),WHOQOL-BREF Collected at baseline (before intervention) and at the end of the intervention period (after twelve weeks) Quality of life was measured with the WHOQOL-BREF, assessing physical, psychological, social, and environmental domains, where higher scores indicate better quality of life

—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Timed Up and Go Test (TUG) Collected at baseline (before intervention) and at the end of the intervention period (after twelve weeks) The participant is asked to stand up from a chair, walk three meters, turn around, return, sit down again, and the time is recorded,Modified Clinical Test of Sensory Interaction in Balance (mCTSIB) Collected at baseline (before intervention) and at the end of the intervention period (after twelve weeks) Balance was measured using the mCTSIB, where standing under different visual and surface conditions is assessed; longer duration indicates better control,The Five Time Sit to Stand test (5XSTS) Collected at baseline (before intervention) and at the end of the intervention period (after twelve weeks) Lower limb strength was measured by standing up and sitting down five times; shorter time indicates better performance.,Four Meter Walking Test (4MWT) Collected at baseline (before intervention) and at the end of the intervention period (after twelve weeks) Gait speed was measured with the Four Meter Walking Test, where participants walk four meters at a usual pace; shorter time indicates better performance.	—

Measure

Time frame

Timed Up and Go Test (TUG) Collected at baseline (before intervention) and at the end of the intervention period (after twelve weeks) The participant is asked to stand up from a chair, walk three meters, turn around, return, sit down again, and the time is recorded,Modified Clinical Test of Sensory Interaction in Balance (mCTSIB) Collected at baseline (before intervention) and at the end of the intervention period (after twelve weeks) Balance was measured using the mCTSIB, where standing under different visual and surface conditions is assessed; longer duration indicates better control,The Five Time Sit to Stand test (5XSTS) Collected at baseline (before intervention) and at the end of the intervention period (after twelve weeks) Lower limb strength was measured by standing up and sitting down five times; shorter time indicates better performance.,Four Meter Walking Test (4MWT) Collected at baseline (before intervention) and at the end of the intervention period (after twelve weeks) Gait speed was measured with the Four Meter Walking Test, where participants walk four meters at a usual pace; shorter time indicates better performance.

—

Countries

Indonesia

Contacts

Public ContactKing Edward University

King Edward Medical University (KEMU)

info@kemu.edu.pk0924299211145

Outcome results

None listed

Source: TCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Aug 10, 2026