Skip to content

Comparison of Marginal Bone Loss and Clinical Outcomes in Two Different Systems of Bone-Level, Tapered Implant Designs: A Cohort Study

Comparison of Marginal Bone Loss and Clinical Outcomes in Two Different Systems of Bone-Level, Tapered Implant Designs: A Cohort Study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
TCTR
Registry ID
TCTR20251102010
Enrollment
60
Registered
2025-11-02
Start date
2025-08-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Patients with systemic health or controlled medical conditions with single bone-level, tapered implants with Straumann Bone Level Taper (BLT) or Neodent Helix GM bone-level, tapered implants Straumann Bone Level Taper (BLT) Neodent Helix GM

Interventions

Patients receiving single Straumann Bone Level Tapered (BLT) implants.,Patients receiving single Neodent Helix GM implants.
Other,Other
Straumann Bone Level Tapered (BLT),Neodent Helix GM

Sponsors

None listed

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Patients older than 18 years 2. Patients receiving single bone-level, tapered implant placement with Straumann Bone Level Taper (BLT) or Helix GM 3. Patients with systemic health or controlled medical conditions 4. Patients attending all the follow-ups visits (6 months, 1 year) 5. Insertion torque at implant placement visit not greater than 35 Ncm and not less than 10 Ncm 6. Implants placed in ideal position: at least a minimum of 1.5 mm from the adjacent tooth structure, at least a minimum of 2 mm present from implant neck to adjacent tooth coronally, adequate surrounding bucco-lingual bone width, and ideal angulation bucco-lingually and mesio-distally 7. Presence of parallel long-cone periapical radiographs from each of the time points to be evaluated in this study: baseline (T0) (i.e., at the time point of implant placement or at the immediately following recall appointment of 2 weeks), at follow-up visits of 6 months (T1), and 1 year (T2) after implant placement

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Patients with records of any previous medical condition, disease, or intake of medication known to alter bone remodeling because of the establishment of biological bone metabolism 2. Patients with previous radiotherapy in the head and neck area 3. Patients with non-treated periodontal disease in the remaining teeth 4. Patients undergoing simultaneous procedure of bone graft, guided bone regeneration, or sinus lift during implant placement

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Marginal bone loss 6 months, 1 year after implant placement millimeters

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Pain and tenderness upon function 1 year after implant placement presence/absence,Mobility 1 year after implant placement Mobility scale of 0,1,2,3,History of exudate 1 year after implant placement presence/absence

Countries

Thailand

Contacts

Public ContactKanyarak Kunyawatyuwapong

Chulalongkorn University

kanyarak.kunya@gmail.com0870223340

Outcome results

None listed

Source: TCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Aug 10, 2026