Skip to content

A randomized controlled trial comparing the clinical efficacy and safety of Meglumine Antimoniate versus Miltefosine in the treatment of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis

A randomized controlled trial comparing the clinical efficacy and safety of Meglumine Antimoniate versus Miltefosine in the treatment of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
TCTR
Registry ID
TCTR20251022011
Enrollment
96
Registered
2025-10-22
Start date
2025-01-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

CUTANEOUS LEISHMANIASIS Meglumine Antimoniate Miltefosine Cutaneous leishmaniasis, meglumine antimoniate, miltefosine, efficacy, safety

Interventions

Patients were randomly allocated to either Group A or Group B, using the lottery method. Group A received meglumine antimoniate at a dose of 20 mg/kg.Follow-up assessments were conducted at 2 weeks, 4
Active Comparator Drug,Active Comparator Drug
Meglumine Antimoniate ,Miltefosine

Sponsors

COMBINED MILITARY HOSPITAL QUETTA
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 63 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1)cutaneous leishmaniasis confirmed by either slit-skin smear and/or skin biopsy.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1)Patients with liver disease, renal disease and cardiac disease, 2) hypersensitivity to meglumine antimoniate or miltefosine .

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Clinical cure by week 8 8 weeks clinical response criterion

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Drug safety was analyzed by assessing frequency and severity of adverse effects. 8 weeks clinical response criterion

Countries

Pakistan

Contacts

Public ContactMAIRA WAJAHAT

COMBINED MILITARY HOSPITAL QUETTA

MAIRAWAJAHAT47@GMAIL.COM03317690447

Outcome results

None listed

Source: TCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Aug 10, 2026