Skip to content

Comparison of two different injection techniques of calcium Hydroxylapatite and Hyaluronic Acid Fillers with glycerol for skin quality enhancement: a split-face randomized trial

Comparison of two different injection techniques of calcium Hydroxylapatite and Hyaluronic Acid Fillers with glycerol for skin quality enhancement: a split-face randomized trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
TCTR
Registry ID
TCTR20250917011
Enrollment
30
Registered
2025-09-17
Start date
2025-06-26
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Enlarged facial pore Good health enlarged pores facial pore calcium hydroxylapatite cross-linked hyaluronic acid

Interventions

The premixed solution, CaHA 1.5ml, HA 1.0ml, and NSS 6.0ml, is injected using blunt 22G cannula into subcutaneous layer in the cheek area. ,The CaHA solution, CaHA1.5ml, and NSS6.0ml, is injected usin
Experimental Drug,Active Comparator Drug
premixed CaHA and HA,comparator

Sponsors

Division of Dermatology, Department of medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi hospital
Lead Sponsor
Merz healthcare (Thailand) company limited
Collaborator

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
Male
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. The participant must be older than 18 years old. 2. Having even enlarged facial pores for both sides 3. No severe co-morbidity

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Having the active facial skin infection 2. Have been treated enlarged facial pore with botulinum toxin within 6 months 3. Have been treated with ablative laser, radiofrequency, or chemical peel within 3 months 4. Have been injected with biostimulators, HA, PLLA, PDLLA, PCL, or CaHA, for enlarged facial pores within 2 years 5. Have been treated with thread implant within 2 years 6. Having a history of keloid 7. Having abnormal coagulation 8. Having a history of allergic to HA filler, or CaHA products 9. Pregnancy or breast feeding

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
mean pore size 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, and 28 weeks Using Antera3D imaging system capture the cheek area

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Global aesthetic improvement scale 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, and 28 weeks Using Trica3D photobooth capture the whole face. Evaluate the global aesthetic improvement scale by compare with the baseline picture.,Pain score after the treatment The participant is instructed to evaluate the pain score by using visual analog scale, marking the pain on the 10 cm in horizon line after the treatment.,texture score 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, and 28 weeks Using Antera3D imaging system capture the cheek area,Jawline assessment 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, and 28 weeks Using Nikon5100D digital camera capture the 45 degree angle of both sides to evaluate the jawline. And using Merz asthetic scale for Jawline to assess the jawline assessment,Adverse events 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, and 28 weeks Evaluate the facial swelling, pain, and bruise duration by asking the participant. The assessor physician inspects and palpates the cheek area of treatment to identify the nodule, lumping, bruise. ,Adverse events 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, and 28 weeks Asking the participant about the facial expression change after injection,Adverse events 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24 ,and 28 weeks The physician inspects cautiously sign of inflammations, redness, pain, or warm.

Countries

Thailand

Contacts

Public ContactVasanop Vachiramon

Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi hospital, Mahidol university

vasanop@gmail.com022011211

Outcome results

None listed

Source: TCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Aug 10, 2026