Skip to content

Comparison of the outcomes of implant placement simultaneous with GBR between using Hyaluronate-combined bone substitute and xenograft in the aesthetic area: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Comparison of the outcomes of implant placement simultaneous with GBR between using Hyaluronate-combined bone substitute and xenograft in the aesthetic area: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
TCTR
Registry ID
TCTR20250827005
Enrollment
36
Registered
2025-08-27
Start date
2025-09-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Patients who had a requirement and were eligible for surgical implant placement simultaneous with GBR for the replacement in a partially edentulous area in anterior maxilla Dental implant GBR

Interventions

The patient who received surgical implant placement simultaneous with GBR using xenograft combined with sodium hyaluronate and collagen resorbable membrane,The patient who received surgical implant pl
Experimental Other,Active Comparator Other
xenograft with sodium hyaluronate,xenograft

Sponsors

None listed

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
20 Years to 80 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1 Individuals who age over 20 years. 2 Good general health or well-controlled disease (ASA Class I or II). 3 Individuals who have an edentulous area or the presence of a hopeless tooth that required extraction and replacement in the central, lateral incisor, canine, first or second premolar region of the maxilla suitable for the simultaneous dental implant placement with GBR. 4 If individuals presented with more than one site of implant placement, the split-mouth technique will be applied.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1 Individuals who have uncontrolled diseases, immunodeficiency, history of malignancy, radiotherapy, or chemotherapy for malignancy within the past 5 years. 2 Individuals being pregnant or breastfeeding. 3 Individuals who have allergy to any material and/or medication used in the study. 4 Individuals who are unwilling to continue for the follow-up period.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The facial bone thickness 6 months The facial bone thickness will be measured in millimeters on the CBCT image perpendicular to the axis of implant at the mid-aspect of implant platform, 2, 4, and 6 mm apical to the implant platform.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Clinical parameters 6 months Clinical outcomes and complication, including presence of Implant mobility, membrane exposure, flap dehiscence, presence of suppuration

Countries

Timor-Leste

Contacts

Public ContactSirida Arunjaroensuk

Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University

sirida.a@chula.ac.th022188587

Outcome results

None listed

Source: TCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Aug 10, 2026