Skip to content

The Reliability of Osseodensification Drilling as Substitute for Standard drilling protocol in narrow alveolar ridges: A randomized controlled clinical study

The Reliability of Osseodensification Drilling as Substitute for Standard drilling protocol in narrow alveolar ridges: A randomized controlled clinical study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
TCTR
Registry ID
TCTR20250801002
Enrollment
40
Registered
2025-08-01
Start date
2025-08-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-03-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

expansion of the narrow alveolar bone in the maxilla and mandible Osseodensification, Ridge expansion, Narrow alveoalr ridge, dental implants, osseointegration

Interventions

received a conventional drilling technique start with: 1-Pilot drill is used (Medentika surgical set, Germany) to make pilot hole in the bone (Clockwise drill speed 800-1000 rpm with copious irrigatio
Active Comparator Procedure/Surgery,Experimental Procedure/Surgery

Sponsors

None listed

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 60 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Absence of any medical disease that compromise wound healing. 2. Patient with good oral hygiene. 3. Narrow alveolar bone (3_5 mm) width measured 1mm sub crestally in CBCT with at least 11 mm bone height in posterior maxillary and mandibular edentulous sites.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Active infection or inflammation in implant area or neighboring zone. 2. Systemic conditions (medically compromised patient) such as uncontrolled diabetes, coagulation disorders, immune compromised patient, patient treated with bisphosphate drugs, psychiatric problems or unrealistic expectations, pregnant women, any medical condition that affect bone healing. 3. Clinical evidence of parafunctional habits. 4. Active periodontitis. 5. Somking of more than 10 cigarettes a day 6. Advanced and complicated cases. 7. Patients who not able to follow the treatment protocol or lost during the study period.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Primary implant stability immediatly after surgery osstell device (ISQ Values),secondary implant stability 16 weeks after initial surgery Osstell device (ISQ values)

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Marginal bone Loss comparing the Pre and Post surgical CBCTs CBCT device (in mm)

Countries

Iraq

Contacts

Public ContactAhmed AlQuisi

College of Dentistry/Baghdad Unversity

ahmedquisi@gmail.com07811896313

Outcome results

None listed

Source: TCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Apr 4, 2026