Skip to content

The efficacy of fractional and collimated Picosecond Nd:YAG 1,064-nm laser for the treatment of Melasma: a split-face, single-blinded, randomized study

The efficacy of fractional and collimated Picosecond Nd:YAG 1,064-nm laser for the treatment of Melasma: a split-face, single-blinded, randomized study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
TCTR
Registry ID
TCTR20250716011
Enrollment
24
Registered
2025-07-16
Start date
2025-07-17
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Mixed-type facial melasma Melanosis, Fractional picosecond Nd:YAG 1,064-nm laser, Collimated picosecond Nd:YAG 1,064-nm laser

Interventions

The half of facial area is applied with numbness cream and treated with combined fractional and collimated picosecond 1,064 nm laser. ,The other half of the face is treated with collimated picosecond
Experimental Procedure/Surgery,Active Comparator Procedure/Surgery
Combined fractional and collimated picosecond laser,Conventional collimated picosecond laser

Sponsors

Division of Dermatology, Department of medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi hospital
Lead Sponsor
Beauty Solution Co.Ltd
Collaborator

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Male or female participants aged 18 years or older. 2. In good general health with no serious underlying diseases. 3. Presence of mixed-type melasma on both sides of the face with symmetrical distribution. 4. Able to attend scheduled visits and comply with study procedures. 5. Willing to participate in the study and provide written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Received laser treatment, intense pulsed light (IPL), or chemical peeling for melasma within the past 2 months. 2. Used topical treatment for melasma within the past month. 3. Immunocompromised individuals. 4. Active skin infections or inflammation at the treatment site. 5. Open wounds or ulcers at the treatment area. 6. History of skin cancer. 7. Presence of infectious skin conditions or recurrent herpes infection. 8. Uncontrolled inflammatory acne (acne vulgaris). 9. History of keloid scarring. 10. Pregnant or breastfeeding women. 11. History of photosensitivity. 12. Known allergy to topical anesthetics.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
modified melasma area and severity index at 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20 weeks The picture of face was sent to a blinded dermatologist to evaluate the modified melasma area and severity index.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Pigment score of Antera3D imaging system at 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20 weeks The digital photograph is access automatic with Antera3D imaging system utilized the pigment evaluation.,Lightness index at 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20 weeks By using a Colorimeter measures the melasma area at the malar prominent.,Overall aesthetic improvement scale at 20 week The before and after treatment at 20week digital photographs will send to a blinded-dermatologist to evaluate the overall aesthetic improvement scale utilized the visual analog scale.,Patient satisfaction score at 20 week The before and after treatment at 20week digital photographs will send to a patient to evaluate the satisfaction score utilized the visual analog scale.,Pain score at 0, 4, and 8 weeks After the laser treatment the patient will receive the pain score evaluation form using visual analog scale,The adverse events at 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20 weeks The adverse events will be evaluated by both dermatologist and patient in every appointments

Countries

Thailand

Contacts

Public ContactVasanop Vachiramon

Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi hospital, Mahidol university

vasanop@gmail.com022011211

Outcome results

None listed

Source: TCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Aug 10, 2026