Skip to content

Comparison of retention of posterior class i composite resin fillings done by two different incremental and single placement techniques

Comparison of retention of posterior class i composite resin fillings done by two different incremental and single placement techniques

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
TCTR
Registry ID
TCTR20250707001
Enrollment
110
Registered
2025-07-07
Start date
2024-07-10
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

class 1 tooth cavity for filling Retention Technique Composite Resin

Interventions

for patients in this group , Incremental technique for filling the class 1 cavity on molar tooth was used. ,In this group of patients, single bulk technique was used for filling the cavity.
Health Services Research,Health Services Research
Group A patients with class 1 cavity,Group B patients with class 1 cavity

Sponsors

self funded
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
15 Years to 60 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1- 104 patients 2- Aged range 15-60 years 3- having minimum 3mm deep occlusal class 1 cavities of molar teeth, clinically and Radiographically,will be included in this study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1- Patients with mixed dentition, 2- patients with grossly carious teeth 3- patients with root canal treated teeth are excluded

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
RETENTION at 6 months after filling FDI Approves USPHS / Ryge criteria

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
non-retention of filling at 6 months after filling FDI approved USPHS / Ryge criteria

Countries

Pakistan

Contacts

Public ContactYM Khookhar

Bahria University Islamabad, Pakistan

info@fmc.edu.pk00923239832393

Outcome results

None listed

Source: TCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Aug 10, 2026