Skip to content

Comparison of the effectiveness of esflurbiprofen patch with celecoxib tablet in patients after total knee arthroplasty, a randomized controlled trial

Comparison of the effectiveness of esflurbiprofen patch with celecoxib tablet in patients after total knee arthroplasty, a randomized controlled trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
TCTR
Registry ID
TCTR20250625003
Enrollment
100
Registered
2025-06-25
Start date
2024-10-16
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

An esflurbiprofen patch can control pain in patients after total knee arthroplasty as effectively as a celecoxib tablet. Esflurbiprofen patch, Celecoxib tablet, Pain Management, Total knee arthroplasty

Interventions

esflurbiprofen patch,celecoxib tablet
Experimental Drug,Active Comparator Drug

Sponsors

Department of Orthopaedic Faculty of Medicine Chulalongkorn University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
50 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Age more than 50 years old 2. Diagnosed with Knee osteoarthritis and has an appointment for surgery in total knee arthroplasty

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Previous surgery on the same knee within the last 6 months 2. Prior use of NSAIDs within 1 week before surgery 3. Known allergy to the drugs used in this trial 4. Severe gastrointestinal disorders such as severe abdominal pain, hematemesis, and hematochezia 5. Serious concomitant medical illness or major co-morbidity precluding aerobic exercise at 50-60%maximum heart rate. 6. Major neurological conditions. 7. Inability to communicate or unwilling to give informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Difference VAS pain score at rest at 14 days follow up VAS score,Difference VAS pain score at motion at 14 days follow up VAS score

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Difference VAS pain score at rest at 6 weeks follow up VAS score,Difference VAS pain score at motion at 6 weeks follow up VAS score,Range of knee motion at 14 days follow up goniometer,Range of knee motion at 6 weeks follow up goniometer,Performance-based measures at 14 days follow up Time up and go,Performance-based measures at 6 weeks follow up Time up and go,Patient-reported outcome measures at 14 days follow up Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) index,Patient-reported outcome measures at 6 weeks follow up Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) index,Performance-based measures at 14 days follow up Five times sit to stand,Performance-based measures at 6 weeks follow up Five times sit to stand,Performance-based measures at 14 days follow up 3-minute walk test,Performance-based measures at 14 days follow up 3-minute walk test,Adverse drug events at 14 days follow up clinical and lab serum creatinine,Adverse drug events at 6 weeks follow up clinical and lab serum creatinine,Patient-reported outcome measures at 14 days follow up SF-12,Patient-reported outcome measures at 6 weeks follow up SF-12

Countries

Thailand

Contacts

Public ContactRachata Piriyamanun

Faculty of medicine, Chulalongkorn University

rachata02626@gmail.com0845525677

Outcome results

None listed

Source: TCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Aug 10, 2026