Skip to content

Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Two Different Pulp Capping Materials in Indirect Pulp Capping Treatment of Primary Teeth

Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Two Different Pulp Capping Materials in Indirect Pulp Capping Treatment of Primary Teeth

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
TCTR
Registry ID
TCTR20250317019
Enrollment
108
Registered
2025-03-17
Start date
2025-02-02
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dental caries , periapical pathology Dental caries indirect pulp capping

Interventions

This study was conducted at the Department of Pediatric Dentistry . After caries excavation, a 1 mm thick layer of cement was applied to the remaining demineralized dentin. Therabase (Bisco) was the
s instructions. ,After caries excavation, an approximately 1 mm thick layer of Biodentine was applied to the remaining demineralized dentin. Following the application of the pure Biodentine(Septodont
s guidelines.,In the control group, no material was applied to the dentin closest to the pulp, and the restoration was completed. This approach allowed for the evaluation of the treatment groups.
Group 1,Group 2,Control Group

Sponsors

Ataturk University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
4 Years to 8 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1.Pediatric patients without any underlying systemic diseases or medical contraindications. 2.Pediatric patients with Class 2 caries affecting approximately 2/3 of the dentin . 3.Pediatric patients who respond positively to electric and pulp tests . 4.Parents and children who consent to participate in the study . 5.Pediatric patients diagnosed with reversible pulpitis .

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.Pediatric patients exhibiting signs of irreversible pulpitis, such as spontaneous pain and prolonged pain response. 2.Presence of percussion or palpation 3.Pathological mobility 4.Infectious symptoms such as fistula or abscess 5.Discoloration in the clinical examination 6.Presence of radiolucency in the furcation or periapical regions 7.Internal or external root resorption

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Clinical Success The evaluations will be conducted at the same time as the oral examination and bitewing radiographs, Clinical and radiographic evaluations were performed at 1 week 3,6 and 12 months. The presence of symptoms such as pain, swelling, mobility, fistula, abscess, and percussion sensitivity, which are signs of irreversible pulpitis, is evaluated.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
radiographic success The evaluations will be conducted at the same time as the oral examination and bitewing radiographs, Clinical and radiographic evaluations were performed at 1, 6, and 12 months. Radiographic success is evaluated based on criteria such as the absence of periapical radiolucency, dentin bridge formation, absence of root resorption, periodontal ligament and bone structure..

Countries

Turkey

Contacts

Public ContactFatma Sarac

Ataturk University

dtsaracc@gmail.com05061768536

Outcome results

None listed

Source: TCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Aug 10, 2026