Skip to content

Effectiveness of multidirectional upper limb robot training in stroke: A comparison study with conventional rehabilitation

Effectiveness of multidirectional upper limb robot training in stroke: A comparison study with conventional rehabilitation

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
TCTR
Registry ID
TCTR20250312012
Enrollment
30
Registered
2025-03-12
Start date
2025-04-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

stroke with upper extremity paresis Stroke, Rehabilitation robot, Upper extremity, Rehabilitation

Interventions

The intervention group underwent upper limb occupational therapy similar to the control group for 60 minutes per day, 2-3 days per week, and trained with the MDR-1 robotic upper limb trainer for 30 mi
s abilities.,The control group underwent upper limb occupational therapy for 60 minutes per day, 2-3 days per week, totaling 20 sessions.
Robotic upper limb rehabilitation ,Conventional upper limb rehabilitation

Sponsors

None listed

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 80 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Aged between 18-80 years. 2. Patient was diagnosed with the first occurrence of stroke or having a history of stroke but fully recovered from the previous episode. 3. Subacute or chronic phase of stroke recovery, with the duration from diagnosis to enrollment in the study between 1 month and 1 year. 4. Presenting with unilateral weakness of a limb. 5. FMA UE motor score of the affected upper limb in the moderate range (20-47 points for subacute stroke patients and 29-42 points for chronic stroke patients. 6. Not currently participating in the other research studies related to the rehabilitation of the affected limb. 7. Providing informed consent to participate in the study independently or through a legally authorized representative.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Unstable vital signs or neurological symptoms. 2. Severe communication or cognitive impairments that hinder the ability to follow instructions or cooperate in training (e.g., sensory aphasia, global aphasia, Thai Mental State Examination score < 24). 3. Ability to follow only one-step commands. 4. Presence of cerebellar lesions with severe dysmetria detected. 5. Severe unilateral neglect on the opposite side of the lesion (average deviation greater than 6 cm to the right of the center on the bisectional test. 6. Inability to clearly see the training screen used with the robot at a distance of 1 to 2 meters, even after vision correction. 7. Spasticity of the upper limb muscles with a Modified Ashworth Scale score of 3 or higher. 8. Fixed contracture of the shoulder or elbow joints in the affected arm. 9. Moderate to severe pain in the affected upper limb (verbal rating scale of 4 or higher). 10. Inability to sit independently on a chair with a backrest for at least 30 minutes.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
post stroke upper limb recovery after completing 10 sessions, 20 sessions, and at 4 weeks post-completion of 20 sessions. Fugl Meyer Assessment for upper extremity, used to evaluate recovery and motor. Total score from 0-66 points, 42 points for the proximal and 24 points for the distal upper limb.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Muscle Strength, Muscle Spasticity, and Activities of Daily Living after completing 10 sessions, 20 sessions, and at 4 weeks post-completion of 20 sessions. Medical Research Council, Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), Barthel ADL Index

Countries

Thailand

Contacts

Public ContactNanticha Semsawat

Faculty of medicine, Chulalongkorn university

Nantichanan@gmail.com0850256226

Outcome results

None listed

Source: TCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Aug 10, 2026