The comparison of efficacy of electrical drill versus surgical drill in the proximal tibia skeleton traction, A randomized controlled trial

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 2Phase 3

Study type

Interventional

Source

TCTR

Registry ID

TCTR20250105002

Enrollment

Registered

2025-01-05

Start date

2022-05-11

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Femoral shaft fracture Femoral shaft fracture

Interventions

Synthes swiss 511.11,Black+Decker 12V LD12SQ

Active Comparator Device,Active Comparator Device

Surgical Drill,Electrical Drill

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Age

18 Years to 65 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1.Age between 18 to 65 yrs old 2.Femoral fracture that need to skeleton traction 3.Time when fracture to hospital not prolong than 48 hours 4.Skeleton traction within 72 hrs before definite internal fixation 5.Glasglow coma score 15 points

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.Multiple injuries 2.Acute limb ishcemia 3.DM patient 4.Pathological conditions in the brain and mental 5.Pain control before skeleton traction 6.Allergy to Lidocaine 7.The abnormality in sensation 8.Baby , eldery , chornic patient

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Max Temperature 5min Surgical drill / Electrical drill,Mean Temperature 5min Surigcal drill / Electrical drill,Time 5min Surgical drill / Electrical drill	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Pain 5min Surgical drill / Electrical drill,Healing of wound 1month Surgical drill / Electrical drill,Infected wound 1 month Surgical drill / Electrical drill	—

Countries

Thailand

Contacts

Public ContactWatcharapong Jarturongsakun

chonburi hospital

markjisc@gmail.com0882442378

Outcome results

None listed

Source: TCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Aug 10, 2026