Skip to content

Comparing study between flexible panendoscopy and rigid panendoscopy in success rate of laryngoscopy, bronchoscopy and esophagoscopy for tumor mapping and second primary tumor screening in Head and Neck cancer patients; A Randomized Controlled Trial

Comparing study between flexible panendoscopy and rigid panendoscopy in success rate of laryngoscopy, bronchoscopy and esophagoscopy for tumor mapping and second primary tumor screening in Head and Neck cancer patients; A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
TCTR
Registry ID
TCTR20241215003
Enrollment
140
Registered
2024-12-15
Start date
2023-05-22
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Patients who have been diagnosed with or are suspected of having head and neck cancer based on physical examination or endoscopy, or those with enlarged lymph nodes in the neck, who need screening to detect lesions in the larynx, bronchi, and esophagus, or to assess the lesions before treatment., Patients excluding vulnerable subjects oral cavity cancer, oropharyngeal cancer, hypopharyngeal cancer, laryngeal cancer and neck node unknown primary cancer

Interventions

Operational definition Transnasal flexible panendoscopy (TNE) 1. Patients were examined at outpatient department, after fasting for 6 hours prior to the procedure. 2. Cottonoid soaked 4% lidocaine and
Active Comparator Procedure/Surgery,Active Comparator Procedure/Surgery
flexible panendoscopy,Rigid panendoscopy

Sponsors

Research Department of Otolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine ,Siriraj Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 100 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1.Patients were diagnosed or suspected malignancy in oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx, larynx and neck node unknown primary cancer who need to second primary screening or pre-treatment tumor mapping 2.Patients hreater than 18-year-old

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.Patients who had clinical of upper airway obstruction 2.Patients who had trismus characterized by an inability to open the mouth narrower than 35 millimeters 3.Patients with cervical spine disease who are contraindicated from extending their neck

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Success rate of complete procedure of laryngoscopy,bronchoscopy and esophagoscope date of procedure number patients (%) who can direct visualization from scope following operation definition in all 3 procedure complete

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
incidence of second primary tumor date of procedure number patients (%) who have second primary tumor during procedure,sufficient biopsy rate two weeks after date of procedure numer patients(%) in tissue samples adequate for pathological diagnosis/ patient who underwent biopsy,cost date of procedure until patient discharge from hospital at this admission median(range) in baht,operative time date of procedure median(range) in minutes,waiting time enrollment date to date of procedure median(range) in days,Intraoperative complication date of procedure number of patients(%)

Countries

Thailand

Contacts

Public ContactSarunya Jarrangdet

Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital

minesarunya@gmail.com0865519494

Outcome results

None listed

Source: TCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Aug 9, 2026