Skip to content

Comparing the Effectiveness of CPR Quality with Video-Assisted Instruction via LINE App versus Telephone-Assisted CPR: Randomized Controlled Simulation Study

Comparing the Effectiveness of CPR Quality with Video-Assisted Instruction via LINE App versus Telephone-Assisted CPR: Randomized Controlled Simulation Study

Status
Unknown
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
TCTR
Registry ID
TCTR20241022011
Enrollment
96
Registered
2024-10-22
Start date
2024-10-19
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

This study involves healthy volunteers, with no data collection from vulnerable groups. There is minimal risk to participants, which may include physical fatigue or exhaustion from performing CPR, dizziness, fainting, or light-headedness. Video-assisted CPR, Telephone-assisted CPR, LINE Application

Interventions

Telephone-Assisted CPR, Volunteers receive CPR instructions via traditional telephone communication, where the dispatcher provides verbal guidance without the ability to visually monitor the volunteer
Telephone-Assisted CPR (Traditional Method),Video-Assisted CPR via LINE Application

Sponsors

Khon Kaen University, Thailand
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Age over 18 years. 2. Students at Khon Kaen University from non-health science faculties such as Agriculture, Technology, Engineering, Science, Architecture, Computer Science, Education, Humanities and Social Sciences, Business Administration and Accountancy, Fine and Applied Arts, Economics, Law, Local Government, and Interdisciplinary Studies. 3. No prior practical training in CPR, such as chest compressions or ventilation with mannequins. 4. No real-life CPR experience.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Exclusion Criteria: Individuals with lung, heart, or other conditions that prevent performing CPR. Injuries affecting hands, shoulders, elbows, back, knees, or legs, limiting exertion. Anyone in a cast for any body part. Severe back pain or history of radiating pain down the legs. Easily fatigued during moderate exercise, such as inability to jog for 2 minutes. Vision or hearing impairments, learning disabilities, or communication issues. Pregnant women. Individuals without smartphones capable of video calls and internet access. Individuals without the LINE application.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Effectiveness of Chest Compressions 1 session High-Quality CPR Fraction,Effectiveness of Chest Compressions 1 session Percentage of correct hand position,Effectiveness of Chest Compressions 1 session Percentage of correct Compression Depth,Effectiveness of Chest Compressions 1 session Percentage of correct Compression Rate,Effectiveness of Chest Compressions 1 session Percentage of correct Full Chest Recoil

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
CPR quality 1 session Time to First High-Quality CPR,CPR quality 1 session No Flow Time,Method usability 1 session Completion of Video Call Session via LINE,Volunteer Feedback and Confidence Assessment 1 session Volunteer Feedback and Confidence Assessment

Countries

Thailand

Contacts

Public Contactpariwat phungoen

Comparing the Effectiveness of CPR Quality with Video-Assisted Instruction via LINE App versus Telephone-Assisted CPR: Randomized Controlled Simulation Study

ppariw@kku.ac.th66897111199

Outcome results

None listed

Source: TCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Aug 9, 2026