Skip to content

Efficacy of pulsed radiofrequency for carpal tunnel syndrome: A randomized controlled trial

Efficacy of pulsed radiofrequency for carpal tunnel syndrome: A randomized controlled trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
TCTR
Registry ID
TCTR20241015002
Enrollment
72
Registered
2024-10-15
Start date
2021-04-09
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Mild to moderate degree carpal tunnel syndrome carpal tunnel syndrome, pulsed radiofrequency, median nerve

Interventions

In this study, we apply STIMPOD NMS 460 to generate Non-invasive PRF (pulsed radiofrequency). Non-invasive PRF will generate alternating current, which induce electromagnetic field. Electromagnetic fi
s tolerance. Investigator will place the treatment probe on median nerve at wrist. Treatment time was 5 minutes per session, 1 session per week over 4 weeks ,total 4 session. Moreover participants wil
PRF treatment,Sham PRF treatment

Sponsors

Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 60 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Age 18-60 years old 2. had symptoms of CTS at least 3 months 3. were diagnosed by electrophysiologic test and classified as mild or moderate degree CTS (AAEM minimonograph#26) Mild CTS: prolonged (relative or absolute) sensory or mixed NAP distal latency (orthodromic, antidromic, or palmar) with or without SNAP amplitude below the lower limit of normal. Moderate CTS: abnormal median sensory latencies as above, and (relative or absolute) prolongation of median motor distal latency.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. had underlying metabolic disorder such as diabetes mellitus, thyroid disease, kidney disease 2. Inflammation of joints in hand and wrist such as rheumatoid arthritis 3. had condition mimicking CTS such as cervical radiculopathy, polyneuropathy, proximal median neuropathy, or ulnar neuropathy 4. Previous fracture around wrist and hand or wrist-hand deformity that effect hand function 5. had a thenar hypotrophy or APB weakness or intolerable pain/numbness 6. were diagnosed by electrophysiologic test and classified as severe degree CTS (AAEM minimonograph#26) 7. Previous CTS surgical release, wrist surgery or corticosteroid injection 8. had a cardiac pacemaker, implanted defibrillator, implanted metallic or electronic device 9. Pregnancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Symptoms Severity Scale (SSS) Thai version Boston questionnaire at 2, 3, 6 and 12-week follow-up Thai version Boston questionnaire

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Functional Status Scale (FSS) Thai version Boston questionnaire at 2, 3, 6 and 12-week follow-up FSS has 8 questions.Each question on a scale of 1 to 5 points.A final score is the sum of the individual scores.A higher score indicates that the symptoms of CTS interfere ADL more than a lower score.,Pain score at 2, 3, 6 and 12-week follow-up Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) ,Electrophysiologic parameter of median nerve at 6-week follow-up Electrodiagnosis study,Semmes-Weinstein Monofilament (SWMF) at 6-week follow-up The sensibility testing with Semmes-Weinstein monofilament on palmar side of all distal fingers. Assessor will record the smallest size monofilament, which the participant indicates a correct response

Countries

Thailand

Contacts

Public ContactAssist. Prof. Witsanu Kumthornthip

Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University

wkumthornthip@yahoo.com024197508

Outcome results

None listed

Source: TCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Aug 9, 2026