Skip to content

The correlation between deviation level and marginal bone loss among different techniques of implant placement in conventional and computer-assisted implant surgery: A 1-year Retrospective cohort study

The correlation between deviation level and marginal bone loss among different techniques of implant placement in conventional and computer-assisted implant surgery: A 1-year Retrospective cohort study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
TCTR
Registry ID
TCTR20240916002
Enrollment
120
Registered
2024-09-16
Start date
2024-09-10
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

The deviation level and marginal bone loss among different techniques of implant placement in conventional and computer-assisted implant surgery (CAIS). Computer Assisted Implant Surgery (CAIS), Static CAIS, Dynamic CAIS, Combination of static, The deviation of implant placement, The marginal bone loss

Interventions

The patient who received surgical implant placement by conventional placement (freehand) technique,The patient who received surgical implant placement by static computer-assisted implant placement (gu
Conventional group,Static CAIS,Dynamic CAIS,Combine SD-CAIS

Sponsors

-
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
20 Years to 80 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1 Patient who enrolled in previous study of Yotpibulwong et al. 2023 that performed implant surgery in single tooth space. 2 Healthy patients (ASA classification I and II) aged 20 years or older. 3 Single implant placement with Bone level Straumann dental implants receiving an implant supported crown as a restoration. 4 Patients with adequate volume for implant placement as shown on CBCT and proper anatomic conditions for static CAIS surgery. 5 Parallel periapical radiographic images at baseline (day of surgery), day of prosthesis delivery and 1 year after prosthesis loading. 6 Full length of the implant is visible on the radiograph.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1 Patients with unfulfilled inclusion criteria. 2 Patients who were not further followed at the Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University. 3 Inadequate qualities of periapical radiographic image for interpretation and calibration marginal bone level. 4 On medication group of oral Bisphosphonates longer than 4 years/ Anti-angiogenic/ RANKL inhibitor medications or receiving local radiotherapy. 5 Heavy smoker (>20 pack-years). 6 Periapical film lacking clarity. 7 Radiographic x ray being taken more than 1 month after the restoration loading.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Marginal Bone loss 1 year after loading The marginal bone level was measured from the implant platform to the first bone to implant contact at mesial and distal aspect in periapical film

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
The correlation between deviation level and marginal bone loss 1 year after loading The correlation between deviation level and marginal bone loss among different techniques of implant placement in conventional and CAIS

Countries

Thailand

Contacts

Public ContactSirida Arunjaroensuk

Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University

sirida.a@chula.ac.th022188587

Outcome results

None listed

Source: TCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Aug 9, 2026