Skip to content

Complications of preseptal versus retroseptal transconjunctival approach to isolated orbital wall fractures: A double-blind, non-inferiority, randomized, split-face controlled trial

Complications of preseptal versus retroseptal transconjunctival approach to isolated orbital wall fractures: A double-blind, non-inferiority, randomized, split-face controlled trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
TCTR
Registry ID
TCTR20240909001
Enrollment
177
Registered
2024-09-09
Start date
2015-04-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

The aim of this study was to evaluate the postoperative complications (PC) associated with preseptal transconjunctival approach (PS-TCA) and retroseptal transconjunctival approach (RS-TCA) in managing isolated orbital floor fractures (IOFF) through a randomized controlled trial design with an adequate sample size. The study tested the alternative hypothesis (H1) that PC of one TCA variant would be non-inferior to the other. The specific objectives were (1) to identify a cohort of patients with b

Interventions

preseptal transconjunctival approach to orbital floor fracture,postseptal transconjunctival approach to orbital floor fracture
Experimental Procedure/Surgery,Experimental Procedure/Surgery
PS TCA,RS TCA

Sponsors

None listed

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria required participants to be at least eighteen years of age, to be undergoing treatment for bilateral IOFF falling into Jaquiery et al's category I or II with a follow-up of at least six months, and to have an American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status class of one or two.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Subjects were excluded if they had pre-existing ocular/orbital diseases (e.g., chronic conjunctivitis or lacrimal system obstruction) or wound healing interference (e.g. uncontrolled diabetes mellitus), bleeding disorders, an ASA class 3-5, and fractures involving two or more orbital walls or in conjunction with other facial fractures, such as bilateral Le Fort II fractures or fractures of the infraorbital rim.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Entropion 6 months clinical observation,Ectropion 6 months clinical observation,Implant displacement 6 months clinical observation,Retrobulbar hematoma 6 months clinical observation,Infection 6 months clinical observation,Impaired ocular motility 6 months clinical observation,Enophthalmos 6 months clinical observation,Hypoglobus 6 months clinical observation

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
length of hospital stay at discharge days

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Public ContactPoramate Pitak Arnnop

MKG am Stift

poramate.pitak-arnnop@uk-gm.de00496421586864

Outcome results

None listed

Source: TCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Aug 9, 2026