Comparative treatment outcome between traditional Epley maneuver versus Epley maneuver with dynamic visual device in Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo

Status

Unknown

Phases

Phase 2Phase 3

Study type

Interventional

Source

TCTR

Registry ID

TCTR20240816003

Enrollment

Registered

2024-08-16

Start date

2024-03-01

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

efficacy of visual dynamic device assist in posterior semicircular canal BPPV treatment Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo BPPV Vertigo DizzyFix Epley maneuver CRP canalith repositioning procedure

Interventions

Treatment of Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo by Epley maneuver with dynamic visual device ,Treatment of Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo by Epley maneuver without dynamic visual device

Experimental Device,Active Comparator Other

Epley maneuver with dynamic visual device ,Epley maneuver without dynamic visual device

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Age

18 Years to 75 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Age 18-75 year Diagnosis posterior semicircular canal BPPV (PSCC BPPV)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Bilateral BPPV Multicanal BPPV Ventral vertigo Severe vertigo which cannot tolerate to Epley maneuver Pregnanacy History middle and inner ear surgery

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Treatment of Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo by Epley maneuver with dynamic visual device 1 week using Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) , Visual analogue scale (VAS)	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
compare decrease of dizziness severity and improvement quality of life 1 week improvement post-Epley as percentage	—

Countries

Thailand

Contacts

Public ContactPanuwat Wongwattana

Srinakharinwirot university

panuwatw@gmail.com0909691366

Outcome results

None listed

Source: TCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Aug 9, 2026