Skip to content

Comparing the Efficiency of Using Invisalign First System Versus Removable Acrylic Plate for Anterior Crossbite Correction in Mixed Dentition: A Clinical Investigation

Comparing the Efficiency of Using Invisalign First System Versus Removable Acrylic Plate for Anterior Crossbite Correction in Mixed Dentition: A Clinical Investigation

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
TCTR
Registry ID
TCTR20240731004
Enrollment
62
Registered
2024-07-31
Start date
2024-06-10
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anterior crossbite in mixed dentition patients Anterior Crossbite, Mixed Dentition, Invisalign First System, Removable Acrylic Plates, Treatment Effect, Oral health-related quality of life, Cost-effectiveness

Interventions

Patients will be treated using an upper-jaw plate with protrusion springs or sagittal screws to advance the maxillary anterior teeth.,Patients will be treated with Invisalign First System.
Treatment,Treatment
Removable acrylic plate group, Invisalign First group

Sponsors

Align Technology Inc.
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
6 Years to 13 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Patients in mixed dentition stage, 2. Dental anterior crossbite (at least one permanent maxillary incisor) or functional shift, 3. Absence of skeletal Class III pattern (ANB angle > 1.2), if a functional shift is present, the ANB angle will be measured in the CR position., 4. Mild or moderate crowding in the maxillary arch (up to 4 mm), 5. Anterior crossbite exceeds 1/3 of clinical crown height., 6. No posterior crossbite, 7. Non-extraction treatment plan, 8. No history of prior orthodontic treatment

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Patients with craniofacial syndromes and malformations, including cleft lips and palates., 2. Mentally impaired children or children with disabilities to understand the questionnaire., 3. Lack of willingness from parents and patients to participate in the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
treatment effect at pre-treatment, post-treatment, retention 1 year overjet, overbite, labiolingual tipping effect of maxillary incisors, arch depth, arch length, and molar relationship

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Other outcomes atpre-treatment, 1 month, 3 months, post-treatment, and at 1-year follow-up. treatment duration, success rate, emergency visits, missed school days, oral health-related quality of life, cost-effectiveness

Countries

Thailand

Contacts

Public ContactChanakan Boonchanachai

Orthodontics department, faculty of dentistry

6575305432@student.chula.ac.th66867877946

Outcome results

None listed

Source: TCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Aug 9, 2026