Skip to content

Revision rate of misplaced pedicle screw of the lumbar spine : comparison between freehand technique and intraoperative CT scan based navigated technique

Revision rate of misplaced pedicle screw of the lumbar spine : comparison between freehand technique and intraoperative CT scan based navigated technique

Status
Unknown
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
TCTR
Registry ID
TCTR20240628002
Enrollment
396
Registered
2024-06-28
Start date
2022-06-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Rate of revision between the Freehand technique and the CT scan-based navigation technique in patients with degenerative lumbar disease who have misplaced pedicle screws following surgery misplaced pedicle screws, revision rate, freehand technique, CT scan-based navigation technique

Interventions

Patients who underwent freehand technique, traditional and skill-dependent method that relies on the surgeon&#039
s expertise and familiarity with spinal anatomy, were described as freehand group,Patients who underwent intraoperative CT scan based navigated technique, real-time imaging and computer navigation to
Treatment,Treatment
Freehand,intraoperative CT scan based navigated

Sponsors

None listed

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
40 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1.Patients with degenerative lumbar spine conditions. 2.Patients undergoing spinal surgery using either the freehand technique or intraoperative CT scan-based navigated technique. 3.Patients who are able to attend follow-up appointments for at least 3 months post-surgery. 4.Patients aged 40 years and above.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.Patients who did not receive postoperative radiographic imaging or whose clinical information is insufficient for analysis. 2.Patients who have previously undergone revision surgery.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Revision Surgery Retrospectively, 3 months after surgery percentage of the population for each group

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Factors associated with revision in patients Retrospectively, at 1st visited Patient risks, Radiographic risks, Operative risks, Physician risks

Countries

Thailand

Contacts

Public ContactSittichai Thongsaeng

Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol university

sittichai.t@ubu.ac.th0843026715

Outcome results

None listed

Source: TCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Aug 9, 2026