Skip to content

The Efficacy of Clear Aligner versus Conventional Palatal Expanders in Unilateral Cleft Lip and Cleft Palate Patients

The Efficacy of Clear Aligner versus Conventional Palatal Expanders in Unilateral Cleft Lip and Cleft Palate Patients

Status
Unknown
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
TCTR
Registry ID
TCTR20240529002
Enrollment
30
Registered
2024-05-29
Start date
2024-05-24
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

The presence of a cleft in the palate, with or without a cleft in the lip, is considered the fourth most common congenital malformation and the most common craniofacial anomaly. The common manifestations of CLCP involve disruption of tissue planes above the lip, extending into the nares and/or the palate (hard and/or soft).Development of the lip and palate involves a complex series of events that require close coordination of programs for cell migration, growth, differentiation, and apoptosis. B

Interventions

An orthodontic clear aligner is a transparent, removable dental appliance designed to straighten teeth and correct malocclusions. Made from a medical-grade thermoplastic material, clear aligners are c
s teeth, gradually applying pressure to move them into the desired position. They offer a discreet alternative to traditional metal braces and can be removed for eating, brushing, and flossing, provid
Experimental Device,Active Comparator Device
Clear aligners,Conventional palatal expander

Sponsors

Smartee Thailand
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
6 Years to 12 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Non-syndromic unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLCP), who necessitate intervention prior to SABG 6-12 years of age Normal hearing function Early mixed dentition Good cooperation Ability to produce a repetition of perceptually acceptable sounds

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients with neurological disorders or intellectual, cognitive deficits and poor compliance or communication disorders will be excluded from the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Alteration of arch parameters from T0 to T3 between clear aligner and conventional palatal expanders T0: before appliance insertion; T1: immediately after appliance insertion; and T2: 4 weeks after appliance insertion; T3: prior to SABG Measurement in digital models

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Differences in vowel space area among T0, T1, T2 and T3 in the same individuals and the correlation of these differences with palatal morphology T0: before appliance insertion; T1: immediately after appliance insertion; and T2: 4 weeks after appliance insertion; T3: prior to SABG PRAAT software version 6.0.40

Countries

Thailand

Outcome results

None listed

Source: TCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Aug 9, 2026