Skip to content

A standard versus without hip precaution protocol on functional recovery of hip fracture patients after hemiarthroplasty via piriformis-sparing posterior approach: A randomized controlled trial study

A standard versus without hip precaution protocol on functional recovery of hip fracture patients after hemiarthroplasty via piriformis-sparing posterior approach: A randomized controlled trial study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
TCTR
Registry ID
TCTR20240523001
Enrollment
80
Registered
2024-05-23
Start date
2024-08-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

This research is designed to compare the quality of life through EQVAS score between hip precaution and no hip precaution group in patient with age 60 or more who diagnosed femoral neck fracture and indicated for hemiarthroplasty via Piriformis-sparing posterior approach. hip precaution, quality of life, dislocation, piriformis sparing. no hip precaution, bipolar, hemiarthroplasty

Interventions

Patient in this group will be instructed as followed for 6 weeks 1.Abduction pillow 2.Restrict adduction cross midline 3.Restrict hip flexion beyond 90 degrees 4.Restrict hip internal rotation,Patient
Active Comparator Other,Experimental Other
Standard hip precaution,No hip precaution

Sponsors

Department Orthopaedic Surgery
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
60 Years to 120 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patient with age 60 or older diagnosed with femoral neck fracture who indicated hemiarthroplasty via Piriformis-sparing posterior approach

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.Neuromuscular disorder 2.Developmental dysplasia of the hip 3.Cognitive impairment by Thai Mental State Examination (TMSE) equal to or less than score of 23 4.Pathologic fracture 5.Multiple fracture 6.Previous hip fracture 7.Charlson comorbidity index score 6 or above

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
EQVAS score 0, 2, 6, 12 weeks and 1 year Counts the point

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Numeric pain rating scale 0, 2, 6, 12 weeks and 1 year counts the point,Barthel index 0, 2, 6, 12 weeks and 1 year counts the point,Ability for basic movement scale II (ABMS II score) 0, 2, 6, 12 weeks and 1 year counts the point,Patient satisfactory outcome 0, 2, 6, 12 weeks and 1 year counts the point,Dislocation 0, 2, 6, 12 weeks and 1 year Measured as number

Countries

Thailand

Contacts

Public ContactAasis Unnanuntana

Siriraj hospital

uaasis@gmail.com024197964

Outcome results

None listed

Source: TCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Aug 9, 2026